Academic Radiology
Volume 13, Issue 1 , Pages 84-94, January 2006

Comparison of Independent Double Readings and Computer-Aided Diagnosis (CAD) for the Diagnosis of Breast Calcifications

Department of Radiology, The University of Chicago, 5841 South Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637

Received 4 August 2005; received in revised form 20 September 2005; accepted 20 September 2005.

Rationale and Objectives

The aim of the study is to compare independent double readings by radiologists and computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) in diagnostic interpretation of mammographic calcifications.

Materials and Methods

Ten radiologists independently interpreted 104 mammograms containing clustered microcalcifications. Forty-six of these were malignant and 58 were benign at biopsy. Radiologists read the images with and without a computer aid by using a counterbalanced study design. Sensitivity and specificity were calculated from observer biopsy recommendations, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were computed from their diagnostic confidence ratings. Unaided double-reading sensitivity and specificity values were derived post hoc by using three different objective rules and an additional rule of simulated-optimal double reading that assumed that consultations for resolving two radiologists' different independent diagnoses always produce the correct clinical recommendation. ROC curves of unaided double readings were obtained according to the literature.

Results

Single reading without computer aid yielded 74% sensitivity and 32% specificity, whereas CAD reading yielded 87% sensitivity and 42% specificity and appeared on a higher ROC curve (P < .0001). Three methods of formulating independent double readings generated sensitivities between 59% and 89%, specificities between 50% and 13%, and operating points that moved essentially along the average unaided single-reading ROC curve. ROC curves of unaided independent double readings showed small, statistically insignificant improvement over those of unaided single readings. Results of the simulated-optimal double reading were similar to CAD: 89% sensitivity and 50% specificity.

Conclusion

Independent double readings of mammographic calcifications may not improve diagnostic performance. CAD reading improves diagnostic performance to an extent approaching the maximum possible performance.

Key Words:  Diagnostic radiology, observer performance , receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve , breast radiography , breast neoplasm, diagnosis , breast neoplasm, calcification , computer, diagnostic aid.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 30.00 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1076-6332(05)00808-1

doi:10.1016/j.acra.2005.09.086

Refers to erratum:

  • Comparison of Independent Double Readings and Computer-Aided Diagnosis (CAD) for the Diagnosis of Breast Calcifications

    Yulei Jiang, Charles E. Metz, Robert M. Nishikawa, Robert A. Schmidt
    Academic Radiology April 2006 (Vol. 13, Issue 4, Pages 534-535)

Academic Radiology
Volume 13, Issue 1 , Pages 84-94, January 2006