Academic Radiology
Volume 14, Issue 5 , Pages 522-529, May 2007

Tissue Doppler and Strain Imaging for Evaluating Tissue Elasticity of Breast Lesions

  • Anke Thomas, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Charité−Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: A.T.
  • ,
  • Mathias Warm, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Senology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
  • ,
  • Markus Hoopmann, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Senology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
  • ,
  • Felix Diekmann, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Charité−Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
  • ,
  • Thomas Fischer, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Charité−Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany

Received 29 October 2006; accepted 25 December 2006.

Rationale and Objectives

Sonoelastography depicts the intrinsic elastic properties of a tissue which are characterized by the strain applied to achieve tissue deformation and the velocity at which tissue deformation occurs. The present study served to investigate whether the specificity of B-mode ultrasound (US) can be improved by combining B-mode imaging with tissue Doppler imaging (TDI) and offline analysis of tissue strain imaging (TSI).

Materials and Methods

Fifty women, 25 with malignant and 25 with benign focal breast lesions, were examined by US with a linear transducer (9 MHz, Aplio, Toshiba, Otawara, Japan). B-mode US views of the lesions were overlaid with color-coded TDI information and area quotients (AQ = area B-mode view/area TDI) were calculated. TSI views were reconstructed offline from the source data. This was done by placing a region of interest (ROI) in the target lesion and color-encoded display of the information. In addition, tissue elasticity was evaluated using a scale of 1–5 corresponding to the BI-RADS categories. Maximum strain (strain factor, SF) was determined in the ROI. All patients also underwent mammography. Sensitivities and specificities were calculated and statistical analysis was performed using Wilcoxon’s test.

Results

Sensitivity/specificity was 96%/68% for B-mode US, 100%/40% for combined B-mode US and mammography, and 96%/80% for TSI. The AQ of benign and malignant lesions was significantly different (p = .00008) as was the difference in SF (p = .0004). The readers considered TSI a feasible technique.

Conclusion

Evaluation of elasticity based on the quantification of strain factors improves characterization of focal breast lesions, especially the differentiation of BI-RADS 3 and 4 lesions. Surprisingly, significant results in characterizing breast lesions were obtained with the simple technique of TDI, showing a lower tissue displacement in malignant cases.

Key Words: Strain imaging, breast lesions, breast ultrasound, elastography

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1076-6332(07)00003-7

doi:10.1016/j.acra.2006.12.016

Academic Radiology
Volume 14, Issue 5 , Pages 522-529, May 2007