Academic Radiology
Volume 14, Issue 5 , Pages 539-546, May 2007

Digital Mammography: Comparative Performance of Color LCD and Monochrome CRT Displays1

  • Ehsan Samei, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Duke Advanced Imaging Laboratories, Departments of Radiology Physics and Biomedical Engineering, and Medical Physics Graduate Program, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27705
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: E.S.
  • ,
  • Ananth Poolla, MS

      Affiliations

    • Fischer Imaging Corporation, Denver, CO
  • ,
  • Michael J. Ulissey, MD

      Affiliations

    • Parkland Memorial Hospital, Dallas, TX
  • ,
  • John M. Lewin, MD

      Affiliations

    • Diversified Radiology of Colorado, Denver, CO.

Received 9 November 2006; accepted 16 January 2007.

Rationale and Objectives

To evaluate the comparative performance of high-fidelity liquid crystal display (LCD) and cathode ray tube (CRT) devices for mammography applications, and to assess the impact of LCD viewing angle on detection accuracy.

Materials and Methods

Ninety 1 k × 1 k images were selected from a database of digital mammograms: 30 without any abnormality present, 30 with subtle masses, and 30 with subtle microcalcifications. The images were used with waived informed consent, Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act compliance, and Institutional Review Board approval. With postprocessing presentation identical to those of the commercial mammography system used, 1 k × 1 k sections of images were viewed on a monochrome CRT and a color LCD in native grayscale, and with a grayscale representative of images viewed from a 30° or 50° off-normal viewing angle. Randomized images were independently scored by four experienced breast radiologists for the presence of lesions using a 0–100 grading scale. To compare diagnostic performance of the display modes, observer scores were analyzed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) and analysis of variance.

Results

For masses and microcalcifications, the detection rate in terms of the area under the ROC curve (Az) showed a 2% increase and a 4% decrease from CRT to LCD, respectively. However, differences were not statistically significant (P > .05). The viewing angle data showed better microcalcification detection but lower mass detection at 30° viewing orientation. The overall results varied notably from observer to observer yielding no statistically discernible trends across all observers, suggesting that within the 0–50° viewing angle range and in a controlled observer experiment, the variation in the contrast response of the LCD has little or no impact on the detection of mammographic lesions.

Conclusions

Although CRTs and LCDs differ in terms of angular response, resolution, noise, and color, these characteristics seem to have little influence on the detection of mammographic lesions. The results suggest comparable performance in clinical applications of the two devices.

Key Words: Diagnostic accuracy, digital mammography, liquid crystal display, cathode ray tube, medical display

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

1 Supported in part by a grant from the NIH, R44 CA099068.

PII: S1076-6332(07)00029-3

doi:10.1016/j.acra.2007.01.022

Academic Radiology
Volume 14, Issue 5 , Pages 539-546, May 2007