Academic Radiology
Volume 14, Issue 7 , Pages 788-794 , July 2007

3D and 2D Delayed-Enhancement Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Detection of Myocardial Infarction: Preclinical and Clinical Results

  • Daniel Peukert, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Charité, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Institut für Radiologie, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
    • ,
  • Michael Laule, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Cardiology, Charité, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Institut für Radiologie, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany.
    • ,
  • Matthias Taupitz, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Charité, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Institut für Radiologie, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
    • ,
  • Nicola Kaufels, DVM

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Charité, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Institut für Radiologie, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
    • ,
  • Bernd Hamm, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Charité, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Institut für Radiologie, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
    • ,
  • Marc Dewey, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Charité, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Institut für Radiologie, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: M.D.

Received 14 December 2006 ,Accepted 10 March 2007.

References 

  1. Elliott MD, Kim RJ. Late gadolinium cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the assessment of myocardial viability. Coron Artery Dis. 2005;16:365–372
  2. Wagner A, Mahrholdt H, Holly TA, et al. Contrast-enhanced MRI and routine single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) perfusion imaging for detection of subendocardial myocardial infarcts: an imaging study. Lancet. 2003;361:374–379
  3. Kim RJ, Wu E, Rafael A, et al. The use of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging to identify reversible myocardial dysfunction. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:1445–1453
  4. Simonetti OP, Kim RJ, Fieno DS, et al. An improved MR imaging technique for the visualization of myocardial infarction. Radiology. 2001;218:215–223
  5. Dewey M, Kaufels M, Laule M, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of myocardial perfusion and viability using a blood pool contrast agent. Invest Radiol. 2004;39:498–505
  6. Barkhausen J, Ebert W, Debatin JF, Weinmann HJ. Imaging of myocardial infarction: comparison of Magnevist and gadophrin-3 in rabbits. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39:1392–1398
  7. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, et al. Standardized myocardial segmentation and nomenclature for tomographic imaging of the heart: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Cardiac Imaging Committee of the Council on Clinical Cardiology of the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2002;105:539–542
  8. Fox CS, Evans JC, Larson MG, et al. Temporal trends in coronary heart disease mortality and sudden cardiac death from 1950 to 1999: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2004;110:522–527
  9. Kühl HP, Papavasiliu TS, Beek AM, et al. Myocardial viability: rapid assessment with delayed contrast-enhanced MR imaging with three-dimensional inversion-recovery prepared pulse sequence. Radiology. 2004;230:576–582
  10. Foo TK, Stanley DW, Castillo E, et al. Myocardial viability: breath-hold 3D MR imaging of delayed hyperenhancement with variable sampling in time. Radiology. 2004;230:845–851
  11. Tatli S, Zou KH, Fruitman M, et al. Three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging technique for myocardial-delayed hyperenhancement: a comparison with the two-dimensional technique. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004;20:378–382
  12. Carr J, Pereles F, McCarthy R, et al. Delayed contrast-enhanced imaging of left ventricular myocardial scarring using single-shot inversion recovery (IR) true-FISP [abstract]. Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med. 2003;11:1612
  13. Dewey M, Laule M, Taupitz M, et al. Myocardial viability: assessment with three-dimensional MR imaging in pigs and patients. Radiology. 2006;239:703–709
  14. Kellman P, Arai AE, McVeigh ER, et al. Phase-sensitive inversion recovery for detecting myocardial infarction using gadolinium-delayed hyperenhancement. Magn Reson Med. 2002;47:372–383
  15. Kellman P, Larson AC, Hsu LY, et al. Motion-corrected free-breathing delayed enhancement imaging of myocardial infarction. Magn Reson Med. 2005;53:194–200
  16. Balci NC, Inan N, Anik Y, et al. Low-dose gadobenate dimeglumine versus standard-dose gadopentate dimeglumine for delayed contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Acad Radiol. 2006;13:833–839
  17. Huber A, Schoenberg SO, Spannagl B, et al. Single-shot inversion recovery TrueFISP for assessment of myocardial infarction. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186:627–633
  18. Wintersperger BJ, Nikolaou K, Dietrich O, et al. Single breath-hold real-time cine MR imaging: improved temporal resolution using generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisition (GRAPPA) algorithm. Eur Radiol. 2003;13:1931–1936
  19. Schuijf JD, Kaandorp TA, Lamb HJ, et al. Quantification of myocardial infarct size and transmurality by contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in men. Am J Cardiol. 2004;94:284–288
  20. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:307–310

PII: S1076-6332(07)00143-2

doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2007.03.006

Academic Radiology
Volume 14, Issue 7 , Pages 788-794 , July 2007

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution