Academic Radiology
Volume 14, Issue 7 , Pages 795-803, July 2007

Gain in Signal-to-Noise for First-Pass Contrast-Enhanced Abdominal MR Angiography at 3 Tesla Over Standard 1.5 Tesla: Prediction with a Computer Model

  • Elmar Max Merkle, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3808, Duke North, Room 1417, Erwin Road, Durham, NC 27710
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: E.M.M.
  • ,
  • Brian Marshall Dale, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Physics and IDEA, Siemens Medical Solutions, Inc, MR R&D Collaborations, Cary, NC.
  • ,
  • Daniel Paul Barboriak, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3808, Duke North, Room 1417, Erwin Road, Durham, NC 27710

Received 6 December 2006; accepted 13 March 2007.

Rationale and Objectives

To estimate the gain in signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in first-pass contrast-enhanced (CE) abdominal magnetic resonance angiography (MRA) at 3.0 T compared with 1.5 T.

Materials and Methods

Three protocols were simulated using six contrast agents: gadopentetate dimeglumine (Magnevist, Berlex, Wayne, NJ), gadoteridol (Prohance, Bracco, Princeton, NJ), gadobenate dimeglumine (Multihance, Bracco, Princeton, NJ), gadodiamide (Omniscan, Amersham Health, Princeton, NJ), gadoversetamide (Optimark, Mallinckrodt, St. Louis, MO), and gadofosveset trisodium (MS-325, EPIX Medical, Cambridge, MA). Contrast concentrations were calculated for five abdominal vessels. Based on these data, the gain in SNR during CE abdominal MRA at 3.0 T over 1.5 T was estimated.

Results

In these simulations, peak concentrations in all five target vessels were about 5 mM, 10 mM, and 0.7 mM for protocol 1, protocol 2, and protocol 3, respectively. A gain in SNR at 3 T over 1.5 T during CE abdominal MRA of at least 94% in all five target vessels could be achieved by applying protocol 1 or protocol 2, whereas protocol 3 provided a gain in SNR of 70%.

Conclusions

Although five of the contrast agents studied fulfill the expectation of providing approximately twice the SNR at 3.0 T versus 1.5 T during CE abdominal MRA, MS-325 offers a gain in SNR of 70% only.

Key Words: Magnetic resonance angiography, 3 Tesla, contrast agent

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1076-6332(07)00144-4

doi:10.1016/j.acra.2007.03.007

Academic Radiology
Volume 14, Issue 7 , Pages 795-803, July 2007