Academic Radiology
Volume 14, Issue 7 , Pages 877-889 , July 2007

Linear Versus Web-Style Layout of Computer Tutorials for Medical Student Learning of Radiograph Interpretation

  • Martin V. Pusic, MD, MA

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
    • M.V.P. is currently at the Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Columbia University, Department of Pediatrics, PH1-137, 622 West 168th Street, New York, NY 10032.
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to M.V.P.
  • ,
  • Vicki R. LeBlanc, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Centre for Research in Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
  • ,
  • Steven Z. Miller, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Pediatrics, College of Physicians and Surgeons, Columbia University, New York, NY.

Received 28 March 2007 ,Revised 16 April 2007 ,Accepted 18 April 2007.

References 

  1. Erkonen WE, D’Alessandro MP, Galvin JR, Albanese MA, Michaelsen VE. Longitudinal comparison of multimedia textbook instruction with a lecture in radiology education. Acad Radiol. 1994;1:287–292
  2. Jaffe CC, Lynch PJ. Computer-aided instruction in radiology: Opportunities for more effective learning. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1995;164:463–467
  3. Skinner BF. Science and Human Behavior. New York: Macmillan; 1953;
  4. Bloom BS. Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of Educational Goals. New York: Longmans, Green; 1956;
  5. Gagné RM, Briggs LJ. Principles of instructional design. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston; 1974;
  6. Jonassen DH. Objectivism versus constructivism: Do we need a new philosophical paradigm?. Educ Technol Res Dev. 1991;39:5–14
  7. Viccellio P, Simon H, Pressman BD, Shah MN, Mower WR, Hoffman JR. A prospective multicenter study of cervical spine injury in children. Pediatrics. 2001;108:e20
  8. Crocker L, Algina J. In: Item Analysis (Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory). Belmont, CA: Thomson Learning; 1986;p. 311–338
  9. Wright BD. Rack and stack: Time 1 versus time 2. Rasch Measure Trans. 2003;17:905–906
  10. Crocker LM, Algina J. In: Procedures for Estimating Reliability (Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory). Belmont, CA: Thomson Scientific; 1986;p. 131–156
  11. Cohen J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988;
  12. Cumming G, Finch S. A primer on the understanding, use, and calculation of confidence intervals that are based on central and noncentral distributions. Educ Psychol Measure. 2001;61:532–574
  13. Kalb B, Gay SB. Internet resources for education in radiology. Acad Radiol. 2003;10(suppl 1):S81–S86
  14. Scarsbrook AF, Graham RN, Perriss RW. The scope of educational resources for radiologists on the internet. Clin Radiol. 2005;60:524–530
  15. ACR Campus. Available at: http://campus.acr.org/acr/Index.aspx. Accessed April 24, 2007.
  16. Aunt Minnie.com. Radiology Learning Center. Available at http://www.auntminnie.com/index.asp?Sec=edu. Accessed April 24, 2007.
  17. Grunewald M, Heckemann RA, Wagner M, Bautz WA, Greess H. ELERA: A WWW application for evaluating and developing radiologic skills and knowledge. Acad Radiol. 2004;11:1381–1388
  18. Grunewald M, Heckemann RA, Gebhard H, Lell M, Bautz WA. COMPARE radiology: Creating an interactive Web-based training program for radiology with multimedia authoring software. Acad Radiol. 2003;10:543–553
  19. Angle JF, Gay SB, Hagspiel KD, Spinosa DJ, Leung DA, Matsumoto AH. Relative value of analog and digital teaching files. Acad Radiol. 2002;9:205–210
  20. Blunt D, O’Regan D. Using PACS as a teaching resource. Br J Radiol. 2005;78:483–484
  21. Scarsbrook AF, Foley PT, Perriss RW, Graham RN. Radiological digital teaching file development: An overview. Clin Radiol. 2005;60:831–837
  22. Weinberger E, Jakobovits R, Halsted M. MyPACS.net: A Web-based teaching file authoring tool. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;179:579–582
  23. Bartlett ES, Maley JE, Fajardo LL. Radiology residency eCurriculum developed in-house: Evaluation of benefits and weaknesses. Acad Radiol. 2003;10:657–663
  24. Roubidoux MA, Chapman CM, Piontek ME. Development and evaluation of an interactive Web-based breast imaging game for medical students. Acad Radiol. 2002;9:1169–1178
  25. Chew FS, Relyea-Chew A. Distributed Web-supported radiology clerkship for the required clinical clerkship year of medical school: Development, implementation, and evaluation. Acad Radiol. 2002;9:713–720
  26. D’Alessandro MP, Galvin JR, Erkonen WE, Albanese MA, Michaelsen VE, Huntley JS, et al. The instructional effectiveness of a radiology multimedia textbook (HyperLung) versus a standard lecture. Invest Radiol. 1993;28:643–648
  27. Lieberman G, Abramson R, Volkan K, McArdle PJ. Tutor versus computer: A prospective comparison of interactive tutorial and computer-assisted instruction in radiology education. Acad Radiol. 2002;9:40–49
  28. Howerton WB, Enrique PR, Ludlow JB, Tyndall DA. Interactive computer-assisted instruction vs. lecture format in dental education. J Dent Hyg. 2004;78:10
  29. Maleck M, Fischer MR, Kammer B, et al. Do computers teach better? (A media comparison study for case-based teaching in radiology). Radiographics. 2001;21:1025–1032
  30. Collins J, Dotti SL, Albanese MA. Teaching radiology to medical students: an integrated approach. Acad Radiol. 2002;9:1046–1053
  31. Mileman PA, van den Hout WB, Sanderink GC. Randomized controlled trial of a computer-assisted learning program to improve caries detection from bitewing radiographs. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2003;32:116–123
  32. Greenhalgh T. Computer assisted learning in undergraduate medical education. BMJ. 2001;322:40–44
  33. Chumley-Jones HS, Dobbie A, Alford CL. Web-based learning: Sound educational method or hype? (A review of the evaluation literature). Acad Med. 2002;77(10 suppl):S86–S93
  34. Letterie GS. Medical education as a science: The quality of evidence for computer-assisted instruction. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2003;188:849–853
  35. Friedman CP. The research we should be doing. Acad Med. 1994;69:455–457
  36. Cook DA. The research we still are not doing: An agenda for the study of computer-based learning. Acad Med. 2005;80:541–548
  37. Valcke M, De Wever B. Information and communication technologies in higher education: Evidence-based practices in medical education. Med Teach. 2006;28:40–48
  38. Mayer RE. Models for understanding. Rev Educ Res. 1989;59:43–64
  39. Large A. Hypertext instructional programs and learner control: A research review. Educ Info. 1996;14:95–106
  40. Schmidt RA, Bjork RA. New conceptualizations of practice: Common principles in three paradigms suggest new concepts for training. Psychol Sci. 1992;3:207–217
  41. Eisen LA, Berger JS, Hegde A, Schneider RF. Competency in chest radiography (A comparison of medical students, residents, and fellows). J Gen Intern Med. 2006;21:460–465
  42. Leblanc VR, Brooks LR, Norman GR. Believing is seeing: The influence of a diagnostic hypothesis on the interpretation of clinical features. Acad Med. 2002;77(10 suppl):S67–S69
  43. Myles-Worsley M, Johnston WA, Simons MA. The influence of expertise on x-ray image processing. Learning Memory. 1988;14:553–557

 This study was funded by a Canadian Institute of Health Research and Association of Canadian Medical Colleges Research in Medical Education grant.

PII: S1076-6332(07)00205-X

doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2007.04.013

Academic Radiology
Volume 14, Issue 7 , Pages 877-889 , July 2007