Academic Radiology
Volume 15, Issue 1 , Pages 3-14 , January 2008

Pretest Risk Assessment in Suspected Acute Pulmonary Embolism

  • Clifford R. Weiss, MD

      Affiliations

    • Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 601 N Caroline Street, Room 3254, Baltimore, MD 21287-0801
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: C.R.W.
    • ,
  • Edward F. Haponik, MD

      Affiliations

    • Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC
    • ,
  • Gregory B. Diette, MD, MHS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Medicine, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 601 N Caroline Street, Room 3254, Baltimore, MD 21287-0801
    • ,
  • Barry Merriman, MA

      Affiliations

    • Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University, Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD
    • ,
  • John C. Scatarige, MD

      Affiliations

    • Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 601 N Caroline Street, Room 3254, Baltimore, MD 21287-0801
    • ,
  • Elliot K. Fishman, MD

      Affiliations

    • Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, 601 N Caroline Street, Room 3254, Baltimore, MD 21287-0801

Received 15 June 2007 ,Accepted 13 July 2007.

References 

  1. Moser KM. Venous thromboembolism. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1990;141:235–249
  2. Perrier A, Bounameaux H. Cost-effective diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Thromb Haemost. 2001;86:475–487
  3. Fedullo PF, Tapson VF. Clinical practice (The evaluation of suspected pulmonary embolism). N Engl J Med. 2003;349:1247–1256
  4. Hagen PJ, van Strijen MJ, Kieft GJ, et al. The application of a Dutch consensus diagnostic strategy for pulmonary embolism in clinical practice. Neth J Med. 2001;59:161–169
  5. Value of the ventilation/perfusion scan in acute pulmonary embolism. Results of the prospective investigation of pulmonary embolism diagnosis (PIOPED). The PIOPED Investigators. JAMA. 1990;263:2753–2759
  6. Miniati M, Bottai M, Monti S. Comparison of 3 clinical models for predicting the probability of pulmonary embolism. Medicine. 2005;84:107–114(Balt)
  7. Wicki J, Perneger TV, Junod AF, et al. Assessing clinical probability of pulmonary embolism in the emergency ward: a simple score. Arch Intern Med. 2001;161:92–97
  8. Wells PS, Anderson DR, Rodger M, et al. Derivation of a simple clinical model to categorize patients probability of pulmonary embolism: increasing the models utility with the SimpliRED D-dimer. Thromb Haemost. 2000;83:416–420
  9. Prologo JD, Gilkeson RC, Diaz M, et al. CT pulmonary angiography: a comparative analysis of the utilization patterns in emergency department and hospitalized patients between 1998 and 2003. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;183:1093–1096
  10. Ost D, Khanna D, Shah R, et al. Impact of spiral computed tomography on the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism in a community hospital setting. Respiration. 2004;71:450–457
  11. Wells PS, Ginsberg JS, Anderson DR, et al. Use of a clinical model for safe management of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Ann Intern Med. 1998;129:997–1005
  12. Miniati M, Prediletto R, Formichi B, et al. Accuracy of clinical assessment in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. Am J Resp Crit Care Med. 1999;159:864–871
  13. Miniati M, Monti S, Bottai M. A structured clinical model for predicting the probability of pulmonary embolism. Am J Med. 2003;114:173–179
  14. Wolf SJ, McCubbin TR, Feldhaus KM, et al. Prospective validation of Wells Criteria in the evaluation of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Ann Emerg Med. 2004;44:503–510
  15. Tamariz LJ, Eng J, Segal JB, et al. Usefulness of clinical prediction rules for the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism: a systematic review. Am J Med. 2004;117:676–684
  16. Righini M, Bounameaux H. External validation and comparison of recently described prediction rules for suspected pulmonary embolism. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2004;10:345–349
  17. van Belle A, Buller HR, Huisman MV, et al. Effectiveness of managing suspected pulmonary embolism using an algorithm combining clinical probability, D-dimer testing, and computed tomography. JAMA. 2006;295:172–179
  18. Eisner MD. Before diagnostic testing for pulmonary embolism: estimating the prior probability of disease. Am J Med. 2003;114:232–234
  19. Quiroz R, Kucher N, Zou KH, et al. Clinical validity of a negative computed tomography scan in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: a systematic review. JAMA. 2005;293:2012–2017
  20. Perrier A, Roy PM, Sanchez O, et al. Multidetector-row computed tomography in suspected pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1760–1768
  21. Stein PD, Fowler SE, Goodman LR, et al. Multidetector computed tomography for acute pulmonary embolism. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:2317–2327
  22. Runyon MS, Webb WB, Jones AE, et al. Comparison of the unstructured clinician estimate of pretest probability for pulmonary embolism to the Canadian score and the Charlotte rule: a prospective observational study. Acad Emerg Med. 2005;12:587–593
  23. Rodger MA, Maser E, Stiell I, et al. The interobserver reliability of pretest probability assessment in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism. Thromb Res. 2005;116:101–107
  24. Scatarige JC, Diette GB, Merriman B, et al. Physician satisfaction with high-resolution CT services provided by radiologists: results of a nationwide survey of pulmonary subspecialists. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180:585–589
  25. Cummings SM, Savitz LA, Konrad TR. Reported response rates to mailed physician questionnaires. Health Serv Res. 2001;35:1347–1355
  26. Asch DA, Jedrziewski MK, Christakis NA. Response rates to mail surveys published in medical journals. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50:1129–1136
  27. Weiss CR, Scatarige JC, Diette GB, et al. CT Pulmonary angiography is the first-line imaging test for acute pulmonary embolism: a survey of US clinicians. Acad Radiol. 2006;13:434–446
  28. Scatarige JC, Weiss CR, Diette GB, et al. Scanning systems and protocols used during imaging for acute pulmonary embolism how much do our clinical colleagues know?. Acad Radiol. 2006;13:678–685
  29. Tapson VF, Carroll BA, Davidson BL, et al. The diagnostic approach to acute venous thromboembolism. Clinical practice guideline. American Thoracic Society. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999;160:1043–1066
  30. Clinical policy: critical issues in the evaluation and management of adult patients presenting with suspected pulmonary embolism. Ann Emerg Med. 2003;41:257–270
  31. British Thoracic Society guidelines for the management of suspected acute pulmonary embolism. Thorax. 2003;58:470–483
  32. Hernandez DV, Schmaling KB. Understanding and resolving adherence problems. Clin Rev Allergy Immunol. 2004;27:65–73
  33. Adams RJ, Fuhlbrigge A, Guilbert T, et al. Inadequate use of asthma medication in the United States: results of the asthma in America national population survey. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2002;110:58–64
  34. Legorreta AP, Christian-Herman J, O’Connor RD, et al. Compliance with national asthma management guidelines and specialty care: a health maintenance organization experience. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158:457–464
  35. Vollmer WM, O’Hollaren M, Ettinger KM, et al. Specialty differences in the management of asthma (A cross-sectional assessment of allergists’ patients and generalists’ patients in a large HMO). Arch Intern Med. 1997;157:1201–1208
  36. O’Dowd LC, Fife D, Tenhave T, et al. Attitudes of physicians toward objective measures of airway function in asthma. Am J Med. 2003;114:391–396
  37. Karras DJ, Kruus LK, Cienki JJ, et al. Evaluation and treatment of patients with severely elevated blood pressure in academic emergency departments: a multicenter study. Ann Emerg Med. 2006;47:230–236
  38. Milchak JL, Carter BL, James PA, et al. Measuring adherence to practice guidelines for the management of hypertension: an evaluation of the literature. Hypertension. 2004;4 4:602–608
  39. Worrall G, Chaulk P, Freake D. The effects of clinical practice guidelines on patient outcomes in primary care: a systematic review. CMAJ. 1997;156:1705–1712
  40. Cabana MD, Rand CS, Powe NR, et al. Why don’t physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? (A framework for improvement). JAMA. 1999;282:1458–1465
  41. Gupta L, Ward JE, Hayward RS. Clinical practice guidelines in general practice: a national survey of recall, attitudes and impact. Med J Aust. 1997;166:69–72
  42. Lomas J, Anderson GM, Domnick-Pierre K, et al. Do practice guidelines guide practice? (The effect of a consensus statement on the practice of physicians). N Engl J Med. 1989;321:1306–1311
  43. Mottur-Pilson C, Snow V, Bartlett K. Physician explanations for failing to comply with “best practices.”. Eff Clin Pract. 2001;4:207–213
  44. Larkin M. Noncompliance with “best practices” may be justifiable. Lancet. 2001;358:1433
  45. Kabrhel C, McAfee AT, Goldhaber SZ. The contribution of the subjective component of the Canadian Pulmonary Embolism Score to the overall score in emergency department patients. Acad Emerg Med. 2005;12:915–920
  46. Peabody JW, Luck J, Glassman P, et al. Measuring the quality of physician practice by using clinical vignettes: a prospective validation study. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141:771–780
  47. Peabody JW, Luck J, Glassman P, et al. Comparison of vignettes, standardized patients, and chart abstraction: a prospective validation study of 3 methods for measuring quality. JAMA. 2000;283:1715–1722
  48. Dresselhaus TR, Peabody JW, Luck J, et al. An evaluation of vignettes for predicting variation in the quality of preventive care. J Gen Intern Med. 2004;19:1013–1018
  49. Riddle DL, Hillner BE, Wells PS, et al. Improving the diagnostic process for deep vein thrombosis in orthopaedic outpatients. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2005;258–266
  50. Iles S, Hodges AM, Darley JR, et al. Clinical experience and pre-test probability scores in the diagnosis of pulmonary embolism. QJM. 2003;96:211–215
  51. Wigton RS, Hoellerich VL, Patil KD. How physicians use clinical information in diagnosing pulmonary embolism: an application of conjoint analysis. Med Decis Making. 1986;6:2–11
  52. Aberegg SK, Haponik EF, Terry PB. Omission bias and decision making in pulmonary and critical care medicine. Chest. 2005;128:1497–1505

PII: S1076-6332(07)00447-3

doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2007.07.019

Academic Radiology
Volume 15, Issue 1 , Pages 3-14 , January 2008

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution