Academic Radiology
Volume 15, Issue 3 , Pages 326-333, March 2008

Lung Nodule CAD Software as a Second Reader:1

A Multicenter Study

  • Charles S. White

      Affiliations

    • University of Maryland Medical Center, 22 S. Greene Street, Baltimore, MD 21201
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: C.W.
  • ,
  • Robert Pugatch

      Affiliations

    • University of Maryland Medical Center, 22 S. Greene Street, Baltimore, MD 21201
  • ,
  • Thomas Koonce

      Affiliations

    • Little Rock Hematology and Oncology Center, Little Rock, AR
  • ,
  • Steven W. Rust

      Affiliations

    • Battelle, Columbus, OH
  • ,
  • Ekta Dharaiya

      Affiliations

    • Philips Medical Systems, Highland Heights, OH.

Received 4 September 2007; accepted 26 September 2007.

Rationale and Objectives

The purpose of this multicenter, multireader study was to evaluate the performance of computed tomography (CT) lung nodule computer-aided detection (CAD) software as a second reader.

Methods and Materials

The study involved 109 patients from four sites. The data were collected from a variety of multidetector CT scanners and had different scan parameters. Each chest CT scan was divided into four quadrants. A group of three expert thoracic radiologists identified nodules between 4 and 30 mm in maximum diameter within each quadrant. The standard of reference was established by a consensus read of these experienced radiologists. The cases were then interpreted by 10 other radiologist readers with varying degrees of experience, without and then with CAD software. These readers identified nodules and assigned an actionability rating to each quadrant before and after using CAD software. Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to measure the performance of the readers without and with CAD software.

Results

The average increase in area under the curve for the 10 readers with CAD software was 1.9% for a 95% confidence interval (0.8–8.0%). The area under the curve without CAD software was 86.7% and with CAD software was 88.7%. A nonsignificant correlation was observed between the improvement in sensitivity and experience of the radiologists. The readers also showed a greater improvement in patients with cancer as compared to those without cancer.

Conclusions

In this multicenter trial, CAD software was shown to be effective as a second reader by improving the sensitivity of the radiologists in detecting pulmonary nodules.

Key Words: CT, lung nodule, computer-aided detection

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

1 Supported by a grant from Philips Medical Systems, Highland Heights, OH.

PII: S1076-6332(07)00582-X

doi:10.1016/j.acra.2007.09.027

Academic Radiology
Volume 15, Issue 3 , Pages 326-333, March 2008