Academic Radiology
Volume 15, Issue 11 , Pages 1437-1445, November 2008

Evaluation of Computer-aided Diagnosis on a Large Clinical Full-field Digital Mammographic Dataset1

  • Hui Li, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, The University of Chicago, 5841 South Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: H.L.
  • ,
  • Maryellen L. Giger, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, The University of Chicago, 5841 South Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637
  • ,
  • Yading Yuan, BS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, The University of Chicago, 5841 South Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637
  • ,
  • Weijie Chen, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Laboratory for the Assessment of Medical Imaging Systems, Division of Imaging and Applied Mathematics, Office of Science and Engineering Labs, CDRH, FDA, Silver Spring, MD
  • ,
  • Karla Horsch, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, The University of Chicago, 5841 South Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637
  • ,
  • Li Lan, MS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, The University of Chicago, 5841 South Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637
  • ,
  • Andrew R. Jamieson, BS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, The University of Chicago, 5841 South Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637
  • ,
  • Charlene A. Sennett, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, The University of Chicago, 5841 South Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637
  • ,
  • Sanaz A. Jansen, MS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, The University of Chicago, 5841 South Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL 60637

Received 15 February 2008; accepted 11 March 2008.

Rationale and Objectives

To convert and optimize our previously developed computerized analysis methods for use with images from full-field digital mammography (FFDM) for breast mass classification to aid in the diagnosis of breast cancer.

Materials and Methods

An institutional review board approved protocol was obtained, with waiver of consent for retrospective use of mammograms and pathology data. Seven hundred thirty-nine FFDM images, which contained 287 biopsy-proven breast mass lesions, of which 148 lesions were malignant and 139 lesions were benign, were retrospectively collected. Lesion margins were delineated by an expert breast radiologist and were used as the truth for lesion-segmentation evaluation. Our computerized image analysis method consisted of several steps: 1) identified lesions were automatically extracted from the parenchymal background using computerized segmentation methods; 2) a set of image characteristics (mathematic descriptors) were automatically extracted from image data of the lesions and surrounding tissues; and 3) selected features were merged into an estimate of the probability of malignancy using a Bayesian artificial neural network classifier. Performance of the analyses was evaluated at various stages of the conversion using receiver-operating characteristic analysis.

Results

An area under the curve value of 0.81 was obtained in the task of distinguishing between malignant and benign mass lesions in a round-robin by case evaluation on the entire FFDM dataset. We failed to show a statistically significant difference (P = .83) compared to results from our previous study in which the computerized classification was performed on digitized screen-film mammograms.

Conclusions

Our computerized analysis methods developed on digitized screen-film mammography can be converted for use with FFDM. Results show that the computerized analysis methods for the diagnosis of breast mass lesions on FFDM are promising, and can potentially be used to aid clinicians in the diagnostic interpretation of FFDM.

Key Words: Computer-aided diagnosis, full-field digital mammography, breast mass classification

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

1 This work was supported in part by USPHS Grants R01-CA89452, R21-CA113800, and P50-CA125183. M.L.G. is a shareholder in R2/Hologic, Inc. (Sunnyvale, CA). It is the policy of the University of Chicago that investigators disclose publicly actual or potential significant financial interests that may appear to be affected by the research activities.

PII: S1076-6332(08)00280-8

doi:10.1016/j.acra.2008.05.004

Academic Radiology
Volume 15, Issue 11 , Pages 1437-1445, November 2008