« Previous
Next »
Academic Radiology
Volume 16, Issue 2
, Pages 187-193
, February 2009
Coronary Artery Calcium Scoring on Low-dose Prospective Electrocardiographically-triggered 64-Slice CT
References
- ACCF/AHA 2007 clinical expert consensus document on coronary artery calcium scoring by computed tomography in global cardiovascular risk assessment and in evaluation of patients with chest pain. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49:378–402
- . Progression of coronary artery calcification: a pilot study. Mayo Clin Proc. 1999;74:347–355
- . Comparison of serial quantitative evaluation of calcified coronary artery plaque by ultrafast computed tomography in persons with and without obstructive coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 1991;68:1–6
- . Detection and quantification of coronary calcification: an update. Rofo. 2000;172:407–414
- . Quantification of coronary calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990;15:827–832
- Coronary artery disease: improved reproducibility of calcium scoring with an electron-beam CT volumetric method. Radiology. 1998;208:807–814
- . Coronary artery calcium: alternate methods for accurate and reproducible quantitation. Acad Radiol. 1997;4:666–673
- Detection of coronary calcification with electron-beam computed tomography: evaluation of interexamination reproducibility and comparison of three image-acquisition protocols. Am Heart J. 1996;132:550–558
- Variability of repeated coronary artery calcium measurements by electron beam tomography. Am J Cardiol. 2001;87:210–213
- Reproducibility of coronary calcium quantification in repeat examinations with retrospectively ECG-gated multisection spiral CT. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:1532–1540
- Variability of repeated coronary artery calcium measurements by 16-MDCT with retrospective reconstruction. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;184:1917–1923
- Variability of repeated coronary artery calcium scoring and radiation dose on 64-slice and 16-slice CT by prospective electrocardiograph-triggered axial and retrospective electrocardiograph-gated spiral CT—a phantom study. Acad Radiol. 2008;15:958–965
- Variability of repeated coronary artery calcium measurements by 1.25-mm- and 2.5-mm-thickness images on prospective electrocardiograph-triggered 64-slice CT. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:209–216
- . Quantification of coronary artery calcium with multi-detector row CT: assessing interscan variability with different tube currents-pilot study. Radiology. 2003;228:101–106
- Coronary artery calcium measurement with multi-detector row CT and low radiation dose: comparison between 55 and 165 mAs. Radiology. 2005;236:810–814
- Timing on 16-slice scanner and implications for 64-slice cardiac CT: do you start scanning immediately after breath-hold?. Acad Radiol. 2006;13:173–176
- Optimal cardiac phase for coronary artery calcium scoring on single-source 64-MDCT scanner—least interscan variability and least motion artifacts. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008;190:1561–1568
- . Electron beam tomography imaging of coronary calcium: the effect of body mass index on radiologic noise. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2002;26:592–597
- . Coronary artery calcium measurement with multi-detector row CT: in vitro assessment of effect of radiation dose. Radiology. 2002;225:901–906
- . Potential clinical impact of variability in the measurement of coronary artery calcification with sequential MDCT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;184:643–648
- . European Guidelines for Quality Criteria for Computed Tomography. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission; 2000;
- Coronary artery calcium: a multiinstitutional, multimanufacturer international standard for quantification at cardiac CT. Radiology. 2007;243:527–538
- . Small lesions in the heart identified at electron beam CT: calcification or noise?. Radiology. 1994;192:631–636
- Coronary artery calcium scoring with multislice computed tomography (In vitro assessment of a low tube voltage protocol). Invest Radiol. 2006;41:668–673
- Ultra-low-dose coronary artery calcium screening using multislice CT with retrospective ECG gating. Eur Radiol. 2003;13:1923–1930
1 This study was financially supported by the Tsuchiya Foundation, Hiroshima, Japan.
PII: S1076-6332(08)00335-8
doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2008.05.017
© 2009 AUR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Academic Radiology
Volume 16, Issue 2
, Pages 187-193
, February 2009
