Low-dose CT Coronary Angiography Using Prospective ECG-Triggering:1
Impact of Mean Heart Rate and Heart Rate Variability on Image Quality
Rationale and Objectives
The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of mean heart rate (HR) and HR variability on image quality in low-dose computed tomographic coronary angiography (CTCA) using prospective electrocardiographic (ECG) triggering.
Materials and Methods
One hundred thirty-six consecutive patients were scheduled for low-dose CTCA using prospective ECG triggering. The image quality of all coronary segments was rated on a 5-point scale by two independent readers (scores of 1–3 were considered diagnostic, and scores of 4 and 5 were considered nondiagnostic). Intravenous β blockers were administered targeting HR < 65 beats/min before scanning, but not if HR increased during scanning.
Results
After the exclusion of seven patients because of arrhythmia (n = 4) or mean HRs > 65 beats/min despite using β blockers (n = 3), 129 patients underwent computed tomographic scanning. The estimated mean effective radiation dose was 2.2 ± 0.7 mSv (range, 1.1–3.5). The mean HR during scanning was 58.4 ± 6.6 beats/min (range, 44.2–80.1), with a variability of 1.6 ± 1.0 beats/min (range, 0.2–5.3). Mean HR (r = 0.49, P < .001) but not mean HR variability (r = 0.14) was related to image quality. Nondiagnostic image quality on CTCA was found in 5% of the coronary segments in 21 of 129 patients. However, on receiver-operating characteristic analysis, a cutoff HR of 62 beats/min was determined, below which nondiagnostic segments were significantly less frequent (2% vs 14%, P < .001).
Conclusion
Prospective triggering allows low-dose CTCA but requires a low HR. Because a low HR offers a prolonged diastole, widening the optimal phase for scanning, HR variability seems to have a negligible impact on image quality.
Key Words: CT coronary angiography, prospective ECG triggering, heart rate, heart rate variability, image quality
To access this article, please choose from the options below
1 P.A.K. was supported by professorship grant PP00A-114706 from the Swiss National Science Foundation, Bern, Switzerland, and by the Zurich Center for Integrative Human Physiology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.
PII: S1076-6332(08)00414-5
doi:10.1016/j.acra.2008.06.010
© 2009 AUR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
