Academic Radiology
Volume 16, Issue 2 , Pages 150-159, February 2009

Helical Multidetector Row Quantitative Computed Tomography (QCT) Precision1

  • Michael Bligh, MS

      Affiliations

    • Radiation Oncology Centers of Southwest Florida, Bradenton, FL
  • ,
  • Luc Bidaut, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Imaging Physics, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 56, Houston, TX 77030
  • ,
  • R. Allen White, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biostatistics & Applied Mathematics, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 56, Houston, TX 77030
  • ,
  • William A. Murphy Jr., MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Diagnostic Radiology, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 56, Houston, TX 77030
  • ,
  • Donna M. Stevens, MS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Imaging Physics, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 56, Houston, TX 77030
  • ,
  • Dianna D. Cody, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Imaging Physics, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 56, Houston, TX 77030
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: D.D.C.

Received 3 October 2007; accepted 8 August 2008.

Rationale and Objectives

The impact of varying image acquisition parameters on the precision of measurements using quantitative computed tomography is currently based on studies performed before the advent of helical image acquisition and multidetector-row scanners. The aim of this study was to evaluate helical multidetector-row quantitative computed tomography to determine the factors contributing to the overall precision of measurements on quantitative computed tomography conducted using current vintage computed tomographic (CT) scanners.

Materials and Methods

The effects of CT protocol parameters (x-ray tube voltage and current, pitch, gantry rotation speed, detector configuration, table height, and reconstruction algorithm) and short-term scanner variation were examined on two commercially available quantitative CT (QCT) systems (ie, a combination of reference phantoms and analysis software) using seven multidetector-row CT scanners (available from a single vendor) operated in helical mode. Combined with simulated patient repositioning using three ex vivo spine specimens, precision (coefficient of variation) estimates were made on the basis of three scenarios: “best case,” “routine case,” and “worst case.”

Results

The overall best-case QCT precision was 1.4%, provided that no changes were permitted to the bone mineral density (BMD) scan protocol. Routine-case examination (with a BMD reference phantom in place) that permitted some variation in the x-ray tube current and table speed produced a precision of 1.8%. Without any constraints on the clinical QCT examinations, the worst-case precision was estimated at 3.6%.

Conclusions

Although small in appearance, these errors are for single time points and may increase substantially when monitoring changes through QCT measurements over several time points. This calls for increased caution and attention to detail whenever using helical multidetector-row quantitative computed tomography for the assessment of BMD change.

Key Words: Quantitative computed tomography, QCT, bone densitometry, quantitation, density calibration

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

1 This study was supported by the John S. Dunn, Sr. Distinguished Chair in Diagnostic Imaging, University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX.

PII: S1076-6332(08)00499-6

doi:10.1016/j.acra.2008.08.007

Academic Radiology
Volume 16, Issue 2 , Pages 150-159, February 2009