Academic Radiology
Volume 16, Issue 2 , Pages 181-186 , February 2009

Comparison of the Accuracy of CT Volume Calculated by Circumscription to Prolate Ellipsoid Volume (Bidimensional Measurement Multiplied by Coronal Long Axis)

  • Ali M. Rkein, MSII

      Affiliations

    • University of Arizona College of Medicine, PO Box 245067, Tucson, AZ 85724-5067
    • ,
  • Chivonne Harrigal, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, PO Box 245067, Tucson, AZ 85724-5067
    • ,
  • Arnold C. Friedman, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, PO Box 245067, Tucson, AZ 85724-5067
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: A.C.F.
    • ,
  • Daniel Persky, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Oncology, PO Box 245067, Tucson, AZ 85724-5067
    • ,
  • Elizabeth Krupinski, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, PO Box 245067, Tucson, AZ 85724-5067

Received 13 May 2008 ,Accepted 7 August 2008.

References 

  1. MacMahon H, Austin JHM, Gamsu G, et al. Guidelines for management of small pulmonary nodules detected on CT scans: a statement from the Fleischner Society. Radiology. 2005;237:395–400
  2. Gurney JW. Doubling time. http://www.chestx-ray.com/SPN/DoublingTime.htmlAccessed June 2007
  3. Bolte H, Jahnke T, Schafer FK, et al. Interobserver-variability of lung nodule volumetry considering different segmentation algorithms and observer training levels. Eur J Radiol. 2007;64:285–295
  4. Cheson BD, Pfistner B, Juweid ME, et al. Revised response criteria for malignant lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2007;25:579–586

PII: S1076-6332(08)00530-8

doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2008.08.013

Academic Radiology
Volume 16, Issue 2 , Pages 181-186 , February 2009

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution