Academic Radiology
Volume 16, Issue 7 , Pages 836-841 , July 2009

Computed Radiography-based Mammography with 50-μm Pixel Size: Intra-individual Comparison with Film-screen Mammography for Diagnosis of Breast Cancers

Received 5 September 2008 ,Accepted 5 December 2008.

References 

  1. James JJ. The current status of digital mammography. Clin Radiol. 2004;59:1–10
  2. Pisano ED, Yaffe MJ, Hemminger BM, et al. Current status of full-field digital mammography. Acad Radiol. 2000;7:266–280
  3. Lewin JM, Hendrick RE, D'Orsi CJ, et al. Comparison of full-field digital mammography with screen-film mammography for cancer detection: results of 4,945 paired examinations. Radiology. 2001;218:873–880
  4. Fetterly KA, Schueler BA. Performance evaluation of a “dual-side read” dedicated mammography computed radiography system. Med Phys. 2003;30:1843–1854
  5. Yasuda H, Takasu A, Itakura T, Arakawa S. Development of a high-quality “dual-side read” dedicated mammography Fuji computed radiography system. Fuji Med Rev. 2001;10:3–12
  6. Schueller G, Riedl CC, Mallek R, et al. Image quality, lesion detection, and diagnostic efficacy in digital mammography: full-field digital mammography versus computed radiography-based mammography using digital storage phosphor plates. Eur J Radiol. 2008;67:487–496
  7. Bonardi R, Ambrogetti D, Ciatto S, et al. Conventional versus digital mammography in the analysis of screen-detected lesions with low positive predictive value. Eur J Radiol. 2005;55:258–263
  8. Chakraborty DP, Winter LH. Free-response methodology: alternate analysis and a new observer-performance experiment. Radiology. 1990;174:873–881
  9. Yamada M, Shimura K. Improvement of diagnostic-image quality by means of Pattern Enhancement Processing for Mammography (PEM). Fuji Med Rev. 2001;10:13–22
  10. Lewin JM, Hendrick RE, Dórci CJ, et al. Comparison of full-field digital mammography with screen-film mammography for cancer detection: results of 4945 paired examinations. Radiology. 2001;218:873–880

PII: S1076-6332(08)00749-6

doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2008.12.009

Academic Radiology
Volume 16, Issue 7 , Pages 836-841 , July 2009