Academic Radiology
Volume 16, Issue 5 , Pages 535-540, May 2009

Work-in-Progress Toward Incorporating Patients' Preferences in Practice Guidelines for Imaging Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Departments of Radiology (E.D.G., M.B.R., P.C.S.), Public Health (P.C.S.), and Neurology (A.Z.S., M.F.), Weill Cornell Medical College, New York Presbyterian Hospital, 525 East 68th Street, Starr 630, New York, NY 10065; New York College of Osteopathic Medicine, Old Westbury, NY (R.L.G.); Atlantic Neurosurgical Specialists, Morristown, NJ (I.U.)

Received 28 October 2008

Rationale and Objectives

Patient-centered care has become a primary focus in clinical practice. In developing practice guidelines for clinical care, the patients' perspective is an important component.

Materials and Methods

Patients' preferences are represented in a decision analytic model as quality-of-life weights for different health states associated with the aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage population. The time–tradeoff method is used to obtain the individual patients' preferences, which are directly measured in quality-adjusted life years. An individualized care model is explained as a means of implementing a patient-centered approach into practice guidelines for clinical care. A method for calculating the expected value for societal benefit from improved decision making using an individualized care model is reviewed.

Results

We discuss our work-in-progress towards incorporating patients' preferences in a decision analytic model for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage patients. The main methodologic concerns for using patients' preferences in cost-effectiveness analyses for developing practice guidelines are discussed.

Conclusion

Emphasis is placed on using patients' preferences and patient-centered outcome measures in cost-effectiveness analyses.

Key Words: Patient preferences, decision analysis, aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1076-6332(09)00004-X

doi:10.1016/j.acra.2009.01.003

Academic Radiology
Volume 16, Issue 5 , Pages 535-540, May 2009