Academic Radiology
Volume 16, Issue 5 , Pages 535-540 , May 2009

Work-in-Progress Toward Incorporating Patients' Preferences in Practice Guidelines for Imaging Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

Received 28 October 2008

References 

  1. Institute of Medicine 1990 Report: Clinical Practice Guidelines: Directions for a New Program.
  2. Basu A, Meltzer D. Value of information on preference heterogeneity and individualized care. Med Decis Making. 2007;27:112–127
  3. Wartenberg KE, Schmidt JM, Claassen J, et al. Impact of medical complications on outcome after subarachnoid hemorrhage. Crit Care Med. 2006;34:617–623
  4. Mori K, Arai H, Nakajima K, et al. Hemorheological and hemodynamic analysis of hypervolemic hemodilution therapy for cerebral vasospasm after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Stroke. 1995;26:1620–1626
  5. Dorsch NW. The effect and management of delayed vasospasm after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Neurol Med Chir. 1998;38:S156–S160
  6. Kallmes DF, Kallmes MH, Cloft HJ, et al. Guglielmi detachable coil embolization for unruptured aneurysms in nonsurgical candidates: a cost-effectiveness exploration. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1998;19:167–176
  7. Yoshimoto Y, Wakai S. Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening for asymptomatic, unruptured intracranial aneurysms. A mathematical model. Stroke. 1999;30:1621–1627
  8. Kallmes DF, Kallmes MH. Cost-effectiveness of angiography performed during surgery for ruptured intracranial aneurysms. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1997;18:1453–1462
  9. Hunink M, Glasziou P. Valuing outcomes. In:  Hunink M,  Glasziou P editor. Decision making in health and medicine. United kingdom: Cambridge University Press; 2001;103–105
  10. Torrance GW, Thomas WH, Sackett DL. A utility maximization model for evaluation of health care programs. Health Serv Res. 1972;7:118–133
  11. Sommers BD, Beard CJ, D'Amico AV, et al. Decision analysis using individual patient preferences to determine optimal treatment for localized prostate cancer. Cancer. 2007;110:2210–2217
  12. Albertsen PC, Nease RF, Potosky AL. Assessment of patient preferences among men with prostate cancer. J Urol. 1998;159:158–163
  13. Wennberg JE. On patient need, equity, suppler induced demand, and the need to assess the outcome of common medical practices. Med Care. 1985;23:512–520
  14. Fryback DF, Dasbach EJ, Klein R, et al. The Beaver Dam Health Outcomes Study: initial catalog of health-state quality functions. Med Decis Making. 1993;13:89–102
  15. Kim DH, Haney CL, Ginhoven GV. Utility of outcome measures after treatment for intracranial aneurysms. Stroke. 2005;36:792–796
  16. King JT, Kassam AB, Yonas H, et al. Mental health, anxiety, and depression in patients with cerebral aneurysms. J Neurosurg. 2005;103:636–641
  17. Toomela A, Pulver A, Tomberg T, et al. Possible interpretation of subjective complaints in patients with spontaneous subarachnoid hemorrhage. J Rehabil Med. 2004;36:63–69
  18. King JT, Horowitz MB, Kassam AB, et al. The short form-12 and the measurement of health status in patients with cerebral aneurysms: performance, validity, and reliability. J Neurosurg. 2005;102:489–494
  19. Meltzer D, Huang ES, Brown SES, et al. Effects of patient self-selection on cost-effectiveness: implications for intensive therapy for diabetes. Poster presentation at the 27th annual meeting of the Society for Medical Decision Making. October 21-24, 2005; San Francisco.
  20. Swan JS, Fryback DG, Lawrence WF, et al. A time-tradeoff method for cost-effectiveness models applied to radiology. Med Decis Making. 2000;20:79–88
  21. Hunink M, Glasziou P. Constrained resources. In:  Hunink M,  Glasziou P editor. Decision making in health and medicine. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press; 2001;268–269

PII: S1076-6332(09)00004-X

doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2009.01.003

Academic Radiology
Volume 16, Issue 5 , Pages 535-540 , May 2009

Article Tools

* Image Usage & Resolution