Academic Radiology
Volume 16, Issue 7 , Pages 842-851, July 2009

Prediction of Malignant Breast Lesions from MRI Features:

A Comparison of Artificial Neural Network and Logistic Regression Techniques

Department of Epidemiology (C.E.M.), the Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center (C.E.M., W.-P.C.), and the Tu & Yuen Center for Functional Onco-Imaging (K.N., M.-Y.S.), University of California, Irvine, 224 Irvine Hall, Irvine, CA 92697-7550

Received 4 November 2008; accepted 23 January 2009. published online 01 May 2009.

Rationale and Objectives

Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging is a clinical imaging modality for the detection and diagnosis of breast lesions. Analytic methods were compared for diagnostic feature selection and the performance of lesion classification to differentiate between malignant and benign lesions in patients.

Materials and Methods

The study included 43 malignant and 28 benign histologically proved lesions. Eight morphologic parameters, 10 gray-level co-occurrence matrix texture features, and 14 Laws texture features were obtained using automated lesion segmentation and quantitative feature extraction. Artificial neural network (ANN) and logistic regression analysis were compared for the selection of the best predictors of malignant lesions among the normalized features.

Results

Using ANN, the final four selected features were compactness, energy, homogeneity, and Law_LS, with an area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.82 and accuracy of 0.76. The diagnostic performance of these four features computed on the basis of logistic regression yielded an AUC of 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.688–0.905), similar to that of ANN. The analysis also showed that the odds of a malignant lesion decreased by 48% (95% CI, 25%–92%) for every increase of 1 standard deviation in the Law_LS feature, adjusted for differences in compactness, energy, and homogeneity. Using logistic regression with z-score transformation, a model composed of compactness, normalized radial length entropy, and gray-level sum average was selected, and it had the highest overall accuracy, 0.75, among all models, with an AUC of 0.77 (95% CI, 0.660–0.880). When logistic modeling of transformations using the Box-Cox method was performed, the most parsimonious model with predictors compactness and Law_LS had an AUC of 0.79 (95% CI, 0.672–0.898).

Conclusion

The diagnostic performance of models selected by ANN and logistic regression was similar. The analytic methods were found to be roughly equivalent in terms of predictive ability when a small number of variables were chosen. The robust ANN methodology uses a sophisticated nonlinear model, while logistic regression analysis provides insightful information to enhance the interpretation of the model features.

Key Words: Artificial Neural Network, Logistic Regression, Breast Cancer Diagnostic Model

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This work was supported in part by grant R01 CA90437 (O. Nalcioglu) and R21 CA121568 (M.-Y.Su) from the National Cancer Institute (Bethesda, MD), grants 9WB-0020 (M.-Y. Su) and 14GB-0148 (K. Nie) from the California Breast Cancer Research Program (Oakland, CA), and Cancer Center Support Grant No. 2P30CA062203-13S (F.L. Meyskens, Jr) from the National Cancer Institute (Bethesda, MD).

PII: S1076-6332(09)00134-2

doi:10.1016/j.acra.2009.01.029

Academic Radiology
Volume 16, Issue 7 , Pages 842-851, July 2009