Academic Radiology
Volume 16, Issue 9 , Pages 1134-1141.e1, September 2009

An Airway Phantom to Standardize CT Acquisition in Multicenter Clinical Trials

Center of Excellence for Pulmonary Biology, Division of Pediatric Pulmonary (T.E.R., P.R.), and the Department of Radiology (R.R.), Stanford University Medical Center, 770 Welch Road, Suite 350, Palo Alto, CA 94305-5715; the Department of Radiology, Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, OH (F.R.L.); the Department of Biostatistics, University of Washington, and the Cystic Fibrosis Therapeutic Development Network, Seattle, WA (P.S., M.J.E.); the Department of Computer Engineering and Biomedical Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA (J.M.R.); and the Department of Radiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital, Cincinnati, OH (A.S.B.)

Received 31 October 2008; accepted 27 February 2009. published online 25 May 2009.

Rationale and objectives

The purpose of this study was to demonstrate the use of a phantom to standardize low-dose chest computed tomographic (CT) protocols in children with cystic fibrosis.

Materials and Methods

Spiral chest CT scans of a Plexiglas phantom simulating airway sizes (internal diameter, 1.1–16.4 mm; wall thickness, 0.4–4.6 mm) in children with cystic fibrosis were obtained using two multidetector CT (MDCT) scanners (GE VCT and Siemens Sensation 64). Quantitative airway measurements from both scanners were compared with micro-CT airway measurements over a range of doses (0.2–1.8 mSv) to evaluate bias and variance of measurements. The effective doses for CT protocols were estimated using the ImPACT CT Patient Dosimetry Calculator.

Results

Both MDCT scanners were able to accurately measure airway sizes down to 3 mm internal diameter and 1.3 mm airway wall thickness, with errors of <3.5%. ImPACT estimates of effective dose were different for the MDCT scanners for a given peak tube voltage and product of tube current and exposure time. Accuracy and precision were not found to be associated with dose parameters for either machine. Bias in all measurements was strongly associated with airway diameter (P values < .00001), but the magnitude of bias was small (mean, 0.07 mm; maximum, 0.21 mm). Differences between machines in error components were on the order of a few micrometers.

Conclusions

The use of a standard airway phantom confirms that different MDCT scanners have similar results within dose ranges planned for potential future clinical trials. Standardized protocols can be developed that adjust for differences in radiation exposure for different MDCT scanners.

Key Words: Airway phantom, bias, effective dose, chest MDCT, CF

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1076-6332(09)00176-7

doi:10.1016/j.acra.2009.02.018

Academic Radiology
Volume 16, Issue 9 , Pages 1134-1141.e1, September 2009