Journal Home
Search for

Volume 16, Issue 10, Pages 1272-1280 (October 2009)


View previous. 13 of 21 View next.

Intra-individual Comparison of Average Glandular Dose of Two Digital Mammography Units using Different Anode/Filter Combinations

Florian J.F. Engelken, MD, MBChBaCorresponding Author Informationemail address, Henning Meyer, MDa, Ralf Juran, Diploma of Physicsa, Ulrich Bick, MDa, Eva Fallenberg, MDa, Felix Diekmann, MDa

Received 30 January 2009; accepted 25 May 2009. published online 27 July 2009.

Rationale and Objectives

The aim of this study was to compare average glandular dose (AGD) in two full-field digital mammography units using different anode/filter combinations.

Materials and Methods

Mammographies of 50 consecutive patients on a mammography system using a tungsten/rhodium (W/Rh) anode/filter combination were retrospectively compared to prior examinations on a different mammography unit using combinations of Molybdenum (Mo) and Rhodium (Rh). To exclude effects of increasing patient age, two prior examinations within 5 years were used. Both views of one breast were chosen for analysis. AGD was recorded as stated by each mammography unit. Accuracy of stated AGD and contrast-detail resolution were assessed using different breast phantoms.

Results

The mean AGDs from the examinations using W/Rh were 0.95 mGy and 1.01 mGy for craniocaudal (CC) and mediolateral oblique (MLO) views compared to 1.51 mGy and 1.54 mGy, respectively, using combinations of Mo and Rh (P < .001). Relative reduction of AGD was independent of breast thickness but decreased with increasing breast density (partial correlation coefficient of 0.46, P < .005 and 0.57, P < .001, for CC and MLO views, respectively). Low-level contrast resolution was equal in both units using standard acquisition parameters.

Conclusion

In clinical mammographies, higher energy beam spectra obtained using W/Rh anode/filter combinations may significantly contribute to lowering AGD compared to Mo/Mo, Mo/Rh, and Rh/Rh in breasts that are not extremely dense.

a Institut für Radiologie, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany

Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: F.J.F.E.

PII: S1076-6332(09)00311-0

doi:10.1016/j.acra.2009.05.012


View previous. 13 of 21 View next.