Academic Radiology
Volume 16, Issue 11 , Pages 1373-1380, November 2009

Morphologic Features and Flow Void Phenomenon in Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus and Other Dementias:

Are They Really Significant?

  • Oktay Algin, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Uludag University Medical Faculty, Gorukle, Bursa, Turkey
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: O.A.
  • ,
  • Bahattin Hakyemez, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Uludag University Medical Faculty, Gorukle, Bursa, Turkey
  • ,
  • Ozlem Taskapilioglu, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neurology, Uludag University Medical Faculty, Gorukle, Bursa, Turkey
  • ,
  • Gokhan Ocakoglu

      Affiliations

    • Department of Statistics, Uludag University Medical Faculty, Gorukle, Bursa, Turkey
  • ,
  • Ahmet Bekar (Prof)

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neurosurgery, Uludag University Medical Faculty, Gorukle, Bursa, Turkey
  • ,
  • Mufit Parlak (Prof)

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Uludag University Medical Faculty, Gorukle, Bursa, Turkey

Received 5 February 2009; accepted 13 June 2009. published online 01 September 2009.

Rationale and Objective

The aim of this study was to determine the distinctive features of normal-pressure hydrocephalus (NPH) and other dementias on routine T1-weighted and T2-weighted magnetic resonance (MR) images. Also, the contribution of these parameters to the diagnosis and treatment of NPH was investigated.

Materials and Methods

Routine MR images were used to investigate the morphologic features (dilatation of Sylvian cisterns, narrowness of convexity sulci, thickness of corpus callosum (TCC), and dilatation of perihippocampal fissures) and the flow void phenomenon (FVP) in patients with idiopathic NPH (INPH) and other dementias. Routine MR images of 18 patients with INPH, 11 with dementias other than INPH, and 20 controls were retrospectively examined. Morphologic features and the FVP were graded subjectively. The TCC was measured quantitatively. Morphologic parameters, the FVP, and the shunt response were assessed using Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests.

Results

The mean FVP score was significantly higher in patients with INPH (2.89 ± 0.75) than in controls and patients with other dementias (1.1 ± 0.85 and 1.09 ± 0.83, respectively) (P < .001). There was significant difference in terms of TCC between patients with INPH (3 ± 0.7 mm), those with other dementias (1.9 ± 0.7 mm), and controls (5.2 ± 0.8 mm) (P < .001). Significant differences in terms of other morphologic features were found between patients with INPH and those with other dementias (P < .05). No significant difference was found between morphologic parameters and the FVP and the outcome of cerebrospinal fluid diversion (P > .05).

Conclusions

Intense FVP is a signature of but is not pathognomonic for INPH. The morphologic analysis of MR images can be distinctive for the diagnosis of INPH or dementias other than INPH. Detailed evaluation of morphologic features and the FVP in routine MR workup of dementia will be useful for accurate diagnosis.

Key Words: Normal-pressure hydrocephalus, magnetic resonance imaging, subarachnoid space, shunt, cerebrospinal fluid flow dynamics

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 This study was presented as a poster presentation at the 33rd European Society of Neuroradiology Annual Meeting, Krakow, Poland, September 18 to 21, 2008.

PII: S1076-6332(09)00363-8

doi:10.1016/j.acra.2009.06.010

Academic Radiology
Volume 16, Issue 11 , Pages 1373-1380, November 2009