Academic Radiology
Volume 16, Issue 11 , Pages 1373-1380 , November 2009

Morphologic Features and Flow Void Phenomenon in Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus and Other Dementias: Are They Really Significant?

  • Oktay Algin, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Uludag University Medical Faculty, Gorukle, Bursa, Turkey
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: O.A.
  • ,
  • Bahattin Hakyemez, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Uludag University Medical Faculty, Gorukle, Bursa, Turkey
  • ,
  • Ozlem Taskapilioglu, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neurology, Uludag University Medical Faculty, Gorukle, Bursa, Turkey
  • ,
  • Gokhan Ocakoglu

      Affiliations

    • Department of Statistics, Uludag University Medical Faculty, Gorukle, Bursa, Turkey
  • ,
  • Ahmet Bekar (Prof)

      Affiliations

    • Department of Neurosurgery, Uludag University Medical Faculty, Gorukle, Bursa, Turkey
  • ,
  • Mufit Parlak (Prof)

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Uludag University Medical Faculty, Gorukle, Bursa, Turkey

Received 5 February 2009 ,Accepted 13 June 2009.

References 

  1. Kitagaki H, Mori E, Ishii K, et al. CSF spaces in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: morphology and volumetry. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1998;19:1277–1284
  2. Bateman GA, Levi CR, Schofield P, et al. The pathophysiology of the aqueduct stroke volume in normal pressure hydrocephalus: can co-morbidity with other forms of dementia be excluded?. Neuroradiology. 2005;47:741–748
  3. Gangemi M, Maiuri F, Buonamassa S, et al. Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery. 2004;55:129–134
  4. Bradley WG, Whittemore AR, Kortman KE, et al. Marked cerebrospinal fluid void: indicator of successful shunt in patients with suspected normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Radiology. 1991;178:459–466
  5. Kim DS, Choi JU, Huh R, et al. Quantitative assessment of cerebrospinal fluid hydrodynamics using a phase contrast cine MR image in hydrocephalus. Child Nerv Syst. 1999;15:461–467
  6. Luetmer PH, Huston J, Friedman JA, et al. Measurement of cerebrospinal fluid flow at the cerebral aqueduct by use of phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging: technique validation and utility in diagnosing idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery. 2002;50:534–542
  7. Benson D, LeMay M, Patent D, et al. Diagnosis of normal pressure hydrocephalus. New Eng J Med. 1970;283:609–615
  8. Sasaki M, Honda S, Yuasa T, et al. Narrow CSF space at high convexity and high midline areas in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus detected by axial and coronal MRI. Neuroradiology. 2008;50:117–122
  9. Mataro M, Matarin M, Poca MA, et al. Functional and magnetic resonance imaging correlates of corpus callosum in normal pressure hydrocephalus before and after shunting. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007;78:395–398
  10. Bradley WG. Normal pressure hydrocephalus: new concepts on etiology and diagnosis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2000;21:1586–1590
  11. Stein SC. Normal-pressure hydrocephalus: an update. Neurosurg Q. 2001;11:26–35
  12. Kazunari Ishii K, Kanda T, Harada A, et al. Clinical impact of the callosal angle in the diagnosis of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:2678–2683
  13. Savolainen S, Paljarvi L, Vapalahti M. Prevalence of Alzheimer's disease in patients investigated for presumed normal pressure hydrocephalus: a clinical and neuropathological study. Acta Neurochir (Wien). 1999;141:849–853
  14. Ishikawa M. Clinical guidelines for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Neurol Med Chir. 2004;44:222–223
  15. Bradley WC, Scalzo D, Queralt J, et al. Normal pressure hydrocephalus: evaluation with cerebrospinal fluid flow measurements at MR Imaging. Radiology. 1996;198:523–529
  16. Bradley WG. Cerebrospinal fluid dynamics and shunt responsiveness in patients with normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Mayo Clin Proc. 2002;77:507–508
  17. Krauss JK, Havle B. Normal pressure hydrocephalus: survey of contemporary diagnostic algorithms and therapeutic decision-making in clinical practice. Acta Neurochir. 2004;146:379–388
  18. Holodny AI, Waxman R, George AE, et al. MR differential diagnosis of normal pressure hydrocephalus and Alzheimer disease: significance of perihippocampal fissures. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 1998;19:813–819
  19. Kizu O, Yamada K, Nishimura T. Proton chemical shift imaging in normal pressure hydrocephalus. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001;22:1659–1664
  20. Bateman GA. The pathophysiology of idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: cerebral ischemia or altered venous hemodynamics?. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2008;29:198–203
  21. Brecknell JE, Brown JIM. Is idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus an independent entity?. Acta Neurochir. 2004;146:1003–1007
  22. Shiino A, Nishida Y, Yasuda H, et al. Magnetic resonance spectroscopic determination of a neuronal and axonal marker in white matter predicts reversibility of deficits in secondary normal pressure hydrocephalus. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004;75:1141–1148
  23. Hebb AO, Cusimano MD. Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: a systematic review of diagnosis and outcome. Neurosurgery. 2001;49:1166–1184
  24. Dixon GR, Friedman JA, Luetmer PH, et al. Use of cerebrospinal fluid flow rates measured by phase-contrast MR to predict outcome of ventriculoperitoneal shunting for idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Mayo Clin Proc. 2002;77:509–514
  25. Greitz D, Greitz T, Hindmarsh T. A new view on the CSF-circulation with the potential for pharmalogical treatment of childhood hydrocephalus. Acta Paediatr. 1997;86:125–132
  26. George AE, Holodny A, Golomb J, et al. The differential diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease. Cerebral atrophy versus normal pressure hydrocephalus. neuroimaging Clin N Am. 1995;5:19–31
  27. Li Y, Li J, Segal S, et al. Hippocampal cerebrospinal fluid spaces on MR imaging: relationship to aging and Alzheimer disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2006;21:912–918
  28. Lee JH, Lee HK, Kim JK, et al. CSF flow quantification of the cerebral aqueduct in normal volunteers using phase contrast cine MR imaging. Korean J Radiol. 2004;5:81–86
  29. Greitz D, Greitz T. The pathogenesis and hemodynamics of hydrocephalus. A proposal for a new understanding. Int J Neuroradiol. 1997;3:367–375
  30. El Sankari SS, Baledent O, Gondry-Jouet C, et al. Aging effects on cerebral blood and cerebrospinal fluid flows. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2007;27:1563–1572
  31. Kazui H. Cognitive impairment in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Brain Nerve. 2008;60:225–231
  32. Jack CR, Mokri B, Laws ER, et al. MR findings in normal-pressure hydrocephalus: significance and comparison with other forms of dementia. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1987;11:923–931
  33. Geldmacher DS, Whitehouse PJ. Evaluation of dementia. N Engl J Med. 1996;335:330–336

 This study was presented as a poster presentation at the 33rd European Society of Neuroradiology Annual Meeting, Krakow, Poland, September 18 to 21, 2008.

PII: S1076-6332(09)00363-8

doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2009.06.010

Academic Radiology
Volume 16, Issue 11 , Pages 1373-1380 , November 2009