Academic Radiology
Volume 16, Issue 12 , Pages 1502-1508 , December 2009

Peripheral Intravenous Power Injection of Iodinated Contrast Media: The Impact of Temperature on Maximum Injection Pressures at Different Cannula Sizes

Received 27 April 2009 ,Accepted 24 July 2009.

References 

  1. Fleischmann D. How to design injection protocols for multiple detector-row CT angiography (MDCTA). Eur Radiol. 2005;15(suppl):E60–E65
  2. Fleischmann D, Kamaya A. Optimal vascular and parenchymal contrast enhancement: the current state of the art. Radiol Clin North Am. 2009;47:13–26
  3. Bellomi M, Petralia G, Sonzogni A, et al. CT perfusion for the monitoring of neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy in rectal carcinoma: initial experience. Radiology. 2007;244:486–493
  4. Bohner G, Forschler A, Hamm B, et al. Quantitative perfusion imaging by multi-slice CT in stroke patients. [article in German] Rofo. 2003;175:806–813
  5. Feuchtner GM, Muller S, Bonatti J, et al. Sixty-four slice CT evaluation of aortic stenosis using planimetry of the aortic valve area. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189:197–203
  6. Herzog C, Zwerner PL, Doll JR, et al. Significant coronary artery stenosis: comparison on per-patient and per-vessel or per-segment basis at 64-section CT angiography. Radiology. 2007;244:112–120
  7. Kock MC, Dijkshoorn ML, Pattynama PM, et al. Multi-detector row computed tomography angiography of peripheral arterial disease. Eur Radiol. 2007;17:3208–3222
  8. Litmanovitch D, Zamboni GA, Hauser TH, et al. ECG-gated chest CT angiography with 64-MDCT and tri-phasic IV contrast administration regimen in patients with acute non-specific chest pain. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:308–317
  9. Lopes L, Sousa R, Ruivo J, et al. The contribution of perfusion CT in stroke. [article in Portuguese] Acta Med Port. 2006;19:484–488
  10. Matsumoto M, Kodama N, Endo Y, et al. Dynamic 3D-CT angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007;28:299–304
  11. Mueller J, Jeudy J, Poston R, et al. Cardiac CT angiography after coronary bypass surgery: prevalence of incidental findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189:414–419
  12. Sahani DV, Kalva SP, Hahn PF, et al. 16-MDCT angiography in living kidney donors at various tube potentials: impact on image quality and radiation dose. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188:115–120
  13. Scheffel H, Leschka S, Plass A, et al. Accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography for the preoperative detection of coronary artery disease in patients with chronic aortic regurgitation. Am J Cardiol. 2007;100:701–706
  14. Schlosser T, Mohrs OK, Magedanz A, et al. Assessment of left ventricular function and mass in patients undergoing computed tomography (CT) coronary angiography using 64-detector-row CT: comparison to magnetic resonance imaging. Acta Radiol. 2007;48:30–35
  15. Schoellnast H, Deutschmann HA, Berghold A, et al. MDCT angiography of the pulmonary arteries: influence of body weight, body mass index, and scan length on arterial enhancement at different iodine flow rates. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187:1074–1078
  16. Setty BN, Sahani DV, Ouellette-Piazzo K, et al. Comparison of enhancement, image quality, cost, and adverse reactions using 2 different contrast medium concentrations for routine chest CT on 16-slice MDCT. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2006;30:818–822
  17. Silvennoinen HM, Hamberg LM, Valanne L, et al. Increasing contrast agent concentration improves enhancement in first-pass CT perfusion. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2007;28:1299–1303
  18. Sparacia G, Iaia A, Assadi B, et al. Perfusion CT in acute stroke: predictive value of perfusion parameters in assessing tissue viability versus infarction. Radiol Med (Torino). 2007;112:113–122
  19. Knopp M, Kauczor HU, Knopp MA, et al. Effects of viscosity, cannula size and temperature in mechanical contrast media administration in CT and magnetic resonance tomography [article in German]. Rofo. 1995;163:259–264
  20. Halsell RD. Heating contrast media: role in contemporary angiography. Radiology. 1987;164:276–278
  21. Halsell RD. Heating contrast media in a microwave oven. Radiology. 1987;163:279–280
  22. Schwab SA, Uder M, Anders K, et al. Peripheral intravenous power injection of iodinated contrast media through 22G and 20G cannulas: can high flow rates be achieved safely? A clinical feasibility study. Rofo. 2009;181:355–361
  23. Carlson JE, Hedlund LJ, Trenkner SW, et al. Safety considerations in the power injection of contrast media via central venous catheters during computed tomographic examinations. Invest Radiol. 1992;27:337–340
  24. Gebauer B, Teichgraber UK, Hothan T, et al. Contrast media pressure injection using a portal catheter system—results of an in vitro study. [article in German] Rofo. 2005;177:1417–1423
  25. Herts BR, Cohen MA, McInroy B, et al. Power injection of intravenous contrast material through central venous catheters for CT: in vitro evaluation. Radiology. 1996;200:731–735
  26. Rivitz SM, Drucker EA. Power injection of peripherally inserted central catheters. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1997;8:857–863
  27. Ruess L, Bulas DI, Rivera O, et al. In-line pressures generated in small-bore central venous catheters during power injection of CT contrast media. Radiology. 1997;203:625–629
  28. Salis AI, Eclavea A, Johnson MS, et al. Maximal flow rates possible during power injection through currently available PICCs: an in vitro study. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2004;15:275–281
  29. Sanelli PC, Deshmukh M, Ougorets I, et al. Safety and feasibility of using a central venous catheter for rapid contrast injection rates. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2004;183:1829–1834
  30. Williamson EE, McKinney JM. Assessing the adequacy of peripherally inserted central catheters for power injection of intravenous contrast agents for CT. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2001;25:932–937
  31. Zamos DT, Emch TM, Patton HA, et al. Injection rate threshold of triple-lumen central venous catheters: an in vitro study. Acad Radiol. 2007;14:574–578
  32. Knollmann F, Schimpf K, Felix R. Iodine delivery rate of different concentrations of iodine-containing contrast agents with rapid injection. [article in German] Rofo. 2004;176:880–884

PII: S1076-6332(09)00430-9

doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2009.07.026

Academic Radiology
Volume 16, Issue 12 , Pages 1502-1508 , December 2009