Academic Radiology
Volume 17, Issue 2 , Pages 142-145, February 2010

New Compression Paddle for Wire Localization in Mammography

  • Caroline E. Blane, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Health System, 1500 East Medical Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0030
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: C.E.B.
  • ,
  • Mitchell M. Goodsitt, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Health System, 1500 East Medical Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0030
  • ,
  • Jeffrey C. Grimm, BEng

      Affiliations

    • School of Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
  • ,
  • James Pavlik, BEng

      Affiliations

    • School of Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
  • ,
  • Daniel March, BEng

      Affiliations

    • School of Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
  • ,
  • Jonathon T. Ong, BEng

      Affiliations

    • School of Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
  • ,
  • Lisa Blacklaw, RT

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Health System, 1500 East Medical Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0030
  • ,
  • Mark A. Helvie, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Health System, 1500 East Medical Drive, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-0030

Received 17 June 2009; accepted 11 September 2009. published online 12 November 2009.

Rationale and Objectives

Current wire localization compression paddles provide a limited access window with no compression in this window. We describe a new compression paddle that addresses these issues and report on preliminary patient testing.

Materials and Methods

Four mechanical engineering students collaborated with a medical physicist, a radiographer, and two radiologists. Several concept designs were developed, one of which used a mesh surface. This went on to prototype development. After phantom testing, internal review board approval, US Food and Drug Administration waiver for nonsignificant risk device, and Medicare Part A exemption were obtained, the device was used in 10 patients going to wire localization for medical indications. Informed consent was obtained and a range of breast size was included. Wires were positioned from superior, lateral, and medial approach.

Results

A total of 10 wires were successfully positioned in nine patients. The one technical failure was due to inadequate access to the axillary region because of the single prototype size. The grid system provided accurate localization of suspicious findings. The mesh was not visible in digital mammograms so there was no interference.

Conclusion

The new paddle improves on currently available models. Advantages included lack of visual (on imaging) and technical interference from the compression mesh, and compression of the active window allowed localization of subtle findings. The large active area facilitated multiple wire placements within a single window. All localizations were easily performed on the initial image because of the large active window, obviating the need for acquisition of additional images and the associated additional radiation.

Key Words: Breast biopsy, wire localization, breast cancer, mammography

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1076-6332(09)00497-8

doi:10.1016/j.acra.2009.09.005

Academic Radiology
Volume 17, Issue 2 , Pages 142-145, February 2010