« Previous
Next »
Academic Radiology
Volume 17, Issue 2
, Pages 201-206
, February 2010
Usefulness of Additional Coronary Calcium Scoring in Low-dose CT Coronary Angiography with Prospective ECG-Triggering: Impact on Total Effective Radiation Dose and Diagnostic Accuracy
References
- Step-and-shoot data acquisition and reconstruction for cardiac x-ray computed tomography. Med Phys. 2006;33:4236–4248
- Feasibility of low-dose coronary CT angiography: first experience with prospective ECG-gating. Eur Heart J. 2008;29:191–197
- Prospectively gated transverse coronary CT angiography versus retrospectively gated helical technique: improved image quality and reduced radiation dose. Radiology. 2008;246:742–753
- Prospective versus retrospective ECG gating for 64-detector CT of the coronary arteries: comparison of image quality and patient radiation dose. Radiology. 2008;248:431–437
- Prospective versus retrospective ECG-gated 64-detector coronary CT angiography: assessment of image quality, stenosis, and radiation dose. Radiology. 2008;248:424–430
- Determinants of vessel contrast in BMI-adapted low dose CT coronary angiography with prospective ECG-triggering. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009;
- Low-dose CT coronary angiography in the step-and-shoot mode: diagnostic performance. Heart. 2008;94:1132–1137
- Radiation dose reduction and coronary assessability of prospective electrocardiogram-gated computed tomography coronary angiography: comparison with retrospective electrocardiogram-gated helical scan. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:1450–1455
- Accuracy of low-dose computed tomography coronary angiography using prospective electrocardiogram-triggering: first clinical experience. Eur Heart J. 2008;29:3037–3042
- Comparison of diagnostic accuracy of 64-slice computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with low, intermediate, and high cardiovascular risk. Acad Radiol. 2008;15:452–461
- Usefulness of calcium scoring using electron beam computed tomography and noninvasive coronary angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol. 2001;88:219–223
- Impact of coronary calcium score on diagnostic accuracy of multislice computed tomography coronary angiography for detection of coronary artery disease. J Nucl Cardiol. 2007;14:36–43
- Combining dual-source computed tomography coronary angiography and calcium scoring: added value for the assessment of coronary artery disease. Heart. 2008;94:1154–1161
- Coronary artery stenoses: detection with calcium scoring, CT angiography, and both methods combined. Radiology. 2005;235:415–422
- . Radiation risk from coronary artery disease imaging: how do different diagnostic tests compare?. Heart. 2008;94:1519–1521
- Radiation dose to patients from cardiac diagnostic imaging. Circulation. 2007;116:1290–1305
- A reporting system on patients evaluated for coronary artery disease. Report of the Ad Hoc Committee for Grading of Coronary Artery Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Surgery, American Heart Association. Circulation. 1975;51:5–40
- . Accuracy of 16-row multidetector computed tomography for the assessment of coronary artery stenosis. JAMA. 2006;296:403–411
- Interrelation of coronary calcification, myocardial ischemia, and outcomes in patients with intermediate likelihood of coronary artery disease: a combined positron emission tomography/computed tomography study. Circulation. 2008;117:1693–1700
- . How low-risk is a coronary calcium score of zero? The importance of conditional probability. Circulation. 2008;117:1627–1629
- Initial evaluation of coronary images from 320-detector row computed tomography. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008;24:535–546
- Incremental prognostic value of multi-slice computed tomography coronary angiography over coronary artery calcium scoring in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J. 2009 June 29;[Epub ahead of print]
Supported by a grant from the Swiss National Science Foundation and by the ZIHP (Zurich Center for Integrative Human Physiology, University of Zurich, Switzerland).
PII: S1076-6332(09)00499-1
doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2009.09.007
© 2010 AUR. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
« Previous
Next »
Academic Radiology
Volume 17, Issue 2
, Pages 201-206
, February 2010
