Academic Radiology
Volume 17, Issue 2 , Pages 135-141 , February 2010

Characterization of Breast Cancer Types by Texture Analysis of Magnetic Resonance Images

  • Kirsi Holli, MSc

      Affiliations

    • Medical Imaging Centre, Tampere University Hospital, Post Box 2000, 33521 Tampere, Finland
    • Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, Finland
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to K.H.
  • ,
  • Anna-Leena Lääperi, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Medical Imaging Centre, Tampere University Hospital, Post Box 2000, 33521 Tampere, Finland
    • Tampere Medical School, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
  • ,
  • Lara Harrison, MD

      Affiliations

    • Tampere Medical School, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
    • Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, Finland
  • ,
  • Tiina Luukkaala, MSc

      Affiliations

    • Science Center, Pirkanmaa Hospital District, Tampere, Finland
    • Tampere School of Public Health, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
  • ,
  • Terttu Toivonen, MD

      Affiliations

    • Laboratory Centre, Pirkanmaa Hospital District, Tampere, Finland
  • ,
  • Pertti Ryymin, Phlic

      Affiliations

    • Medical Imaging Centre, Tampere University Hospital, Post Box 2000, 33521 Tampere, Finland
  • ,
  • Prasun Dastidar, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Medical Imaging Centre, Tampere University Hospital, Post Box 2000, 33521 Tampere, Finland
    • Tampere Medical School, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
    • Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, Finland
  • ,
  • Seppo Soimakallio, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Medical Imaging Centre, Tampere University Hospital, Post Box 2000, 33521 Tampere, Finland
    • Tampere Medical School, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
  • ,
  • Hannu Eskola, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Medical Imaging Centre, Tampere University Hospital, Post Box 2000, 33521 Tampere, Finland
    • Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tampere University of Technology, Tampere, Finland

Received 17 June 2009 ,Accepted 5 August 2009.

References 

  1. Morris E. Diagnostic breast MR imaging: current status and future directions. Radiol Clin N Am. 2007;45:863–880
  2. Hlawatsch A, Teifke A, Schmidt M, et al. Preoperative assessment of breast cancer: sonography versus MR imaging. Am J Roentgenol. 2002;179:1492–1501
  3. Fischer U, Kopka L, Grabbe E. Breast carcinoma: effect of preoperative contrast-enhanced MR imaging on the therapeutic approach. Radiology. 1999;213:881–888
  4. Orel SG, Schnall MD. MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer. Radiology. 2001;220:13–30
  5. Heywang-Koebrunner SH, Bick U, Bradley WGJ, et al. International investigation of breast MRI: results of a multicentre study (11 sites) concerning diagnostic parameters for contrast-enhanced MRI based on 519 histopathologically correlated lesions. Eur Radiol. 2001;11:531–546
  6. Warren RML, Pointon L, Thompson D, et al. Reading protocol for dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images of the breast: sensitivity and specificity analysis. Radiology. 2005;236:779–788
  7. In:  Tavassoli FA,  Devilee P editor. World Health Organization Classification of tumors. Pathology and Genetics of Tumors of the Breast and Female Genital Organs. Lyon: IARC Press; 2003;
  8. Nunes LW, Schnall MD, Orel SG, et al. Breast MR imaging: interpretation model. Radiology. 1997;202:833–841
  9. Levrini G, Mori CA, Vacondio R, et al. MRI patterns of invasive lobular cancer: T1 and T2 features. Radiol Med. 2008;113:1110–1125
  10. Qayyum A, Birdwell RL, Daniel BL, et al. MR imaging features of infiltrating lobular carcinoma of the breast: histopathologic correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;178:1227–1232
  11. Weinstein SP, Orel SG, Heller R, et al. MR imaging of the breast in patients with invasive lobular carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176:399–406
  12. Jansen SA, Fan X, Karczmar GS, et al. Differentiation between benign and malignant breast lesions detected by bilateral dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: a sensitivity and specificity study. Med Phys. 2008;35:3102–3109
  13. Kuhl CK, Mielcareck P, Klaschik S, et al. Dynamic breast MR imaging: are signal intensity time course data useful for differential diagnosis of enhancing lesions?. Radiology. 1999;211:101–110
  14. Turnbull LW. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in the diagnosis and management of breast cancer. NMR Biomed. 2009;22:28–39
  15. Tuceryan M, Jain AK. Texture analysis. In:  Chen CH,  Pau LF,  Wang PSP editor. The handbook of pattern recognition and computer vision. 2nd ed. New Jersey: World Scientific Publishing Co; 1998;p. 207–248
  16. Castellano G, Bonilha L, Li LM, et al. Texture analysis of medical images. Clin Radiol. 2004;59:1061–1069
  17. Gupta R, Undrill PE. The use of texture analysis to delineate suspicious masses in mammography. Phys Med Biol. 1995;40:835–855
  18. Bader W, Böhmer S, van Leeuwen P, et al. Does texture analysis improve breast ultrasound precision?. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2000;15:311–316
  19. Karahaliou AN, Boniatis IS, Skiadopoulos SG, et al. Breast cancer diagnosis: analyzing texture of tissue surrounding microcalcifications. IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed. 2008;12:731–738
  20. Gibbs P, Turnbull LW. Textural analysis of contrast-enhanced MR images of the breast. Magn Reson Med. 2003;50:92–98
  21. James D, Clymer BD, Schmalbrock P. Texture detection of simulated microcalcification susceptibility effects in magnetic resonance imaging of breasts. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001;13:876–881
  22. Chen W, Giger ML, Li H, et al. Volumetric texture analysis of breast lesions on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance image. Magn Reson Med. 2007;58:562–571
  23. Woods BJ, Clymer BD, Kurc T, et al. Malignant-lesion segmentation using 4D co- occurrence texture analysis applied to dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance breast image data. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007;25:495–501
  24. In:  Hajek M,  Dezortova M,  Materka A,  Lerski R editor. Texture analysis for magnetic resonance imaging. Prague: Med4publishing; 2006;
  25. Haralick RM. Statistical and structural approach to textures. Proc IEEE. 1979;67:786–804
  26. Yeh ED, Slanetz PJ, Edmister WB, et al. Invasive lobular carcinoma: spectrum of enhancement and morphology on magnetic resonance imaging. Breast J. 2003;9:13–18
  27. Kaiser WA, Zeitler E. MR Imaging of the breast: fast imaging sequences with and without Gd-DTPA-preliminary observations. Radiology. 1989;170:681–686
  28. Kuhl CK, Bieling HB, Gieseke J, et al. Healthy premenopausal breast parenchyma in dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging of the breast: normal contrast medium enhancement and cyclical-phase dependency. Radiology. 1997;203:137–144
  29. Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Viehweg P, Heinig A, et al. Contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: accuracy, value, controversies, solutions. Eur J Radiol. 1997;24:94–108Review
  30. Cohen EK, Leonhardt CM, Shumak RS, et al. B. Magnetic resonance imaging in potential postsurgical recurrence of breast cancer: pitfalls and limitations. Can Assoc Radiol J. 1996;47:171–176

 Supported by grants from the research funding of the Pirkanmaa Hospital District, Tampere University Hospital, Jenny and Antti Wihuri Foundation and the Instrumentarium Science Foundation.

PII: S1076-6332(09)00501-7

doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2009.08.012

Academic Radiology
Volume 17, Issue 2 , Pages 135-141 , February 2010