Academic Radiology
Volume 17, Issue 9 , Pages 1071-1072 , September 2010

Comparative Effectiveness Research: What Does It Mean for Imaging?

Received 29 June 2010 ,Accepted 29 June 2010.

References 

  1. US Department of Health and Human Services. Draft definition, prioritization criteria, and strategic framework for public comment. Available at: http://www.hhs.gov/recovery/programs/cer/draftdefinition.html. Accessed June 25, 2010.
  2. Brandt-Zawadski M, Kerlan RK. Patient-centered radiology: use it or lose it!. Acad Radiol. 2009;16:521–523
  3. Saalasti-Koskinen U, Mäkelä M, Saarenmaa I, et al. Personal invitations for population-based breast cancer screening. Acad Radiol. 2009;16:546–550
  4. Hardin LV, Nguyen SA, Ravenel JG. Is e-mail communication effective in changing ordering patterns in the emergency department? A case study of computed tomography for pulmonary embolus. Acad Radiol. 2008;15:433–437
  5. Sasson JP, Zand T, Lown BA. Communication in the diagnostic mammography suite: implications for practice and training. Acad Radiol. 2008;15:417–424
  6. Lown BA, Sasson JP, Hinrichs P. Patients as partners in radiology education: an innovative approach to teaching and assessing patient-centered communication. Acad Radiol. 2008;15:425–432
  7. Neiman HL. Face of Radiology campaign. Acad Radiol. 2009;16:517–520
  8. Rubin DL. Informatics methods to enable patient-centered radiology. Acad Radiol. 2009;16:524–534
  9. Kelly AM, Dwamena B, Cronin P, et al. Breast cancer: sentinel node identification and classification after neoadjuvant chemotherapy—systematic review and meta analysis. Acad Radiol. 2009;16:551–563
  10. Nandalur KR, Dwamena BA, Choudhri AF, et al. Diagnostic performance of positron emission tomography in the detection of coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis. Acad Radiol. 2009;15:444–451
  11. DeMartini W, Lehman C, Partridge S. Breast MRI for cancer detection and characterization: a review of evidence-based clinical applications. Acad Radiol. 2008;15:408–416
  12. El-Maraghi RH, Kielar AZ. CT colonography versus optical colonoscopy for screening asymptomatic patients for colorectal cancer: a patient, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) analysis. Acad Radiol. 2009;16:564–571
  13. Reichman MB, Greenberg ED, Gold RL, et al. Developing patient-centered outcome measures for evaluating vasospasm in aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Acad Radiol. 2009;16:541–545
  14. Sanelli PC, Gold RL, Greenberg ED, et al. Work-in-progress toward incorporating patients' preferences in practice guidelines for imaging aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage. Acad Radiol. 2009;16:535–540
  15. Kelly A, Cronin P. Setting up, maintaining and evaluating an evidence based radiology journal club: the University of Michigan experience. Acad Radiol. 2010;17:1073–1078
  16. Bresnahan BW. Economic evaluation in radiology: reviewing the literature and examples from oncology. Acad Radiol. 2010;17:1090–1095
  17. Reichman M, Gold R, Greenberg E, et al. Validation of a new reference standard for the diagnosis of vasospasm. Acad Radiol. 2010;17:1083–1089
  18. Gold R, Reichman M, Greenberg E, et al. Developing a new reference standard…is validation necessary?. Acad Radiol. 2010;17:1079–1082

PII: S1076-6332(10)00352-1

doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2010.06.018

Academic Radiology
Volume 17, Issue 9 , Pages 1071-1072 , September 2010

Article Tools