Academic Radiology
Volume 19, Issue 2 , Pages 221-228, February 2012

Meaningful Use:

A Call to Arms

  • Adeel Siddiqui, MBBS

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Medical Center, New York, NY
    • Corresponding Author InformationAddress correspondence to: A.S.
  • ,
  • Keith Jay Dreyer, DO, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA
  • ,
  • Supriya Gupta, MBBS, MD

      Affiliations

    • Department of Abdominal Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA

Received 4 September 2011; accepted 14 November 2011.

The benefits of an interactive online world have affected the way we purchase products and plan our vacations. It is only a matter of time before consumers start demanding health care with the same convenience that comes with booking an airline flight or managing a bank account. The health care industry itself requires periodic and mandatory data analysis for outcome analysis, clinical benchmarking, quality improvement, forming guidelines, and making decisions. The federal government and health care community have been working together to come up with more robust and cost-effective health care informatics solutions. Meaningful use (MU) intends to establish a new standard for health care informatics in the United States. The term “meaningful use” implies that health care information and technology systems not just exist, but also serve as an integral part of physician and hospital workflow; leading to cost savings as well as improved outcomes. Under this concept, the federal government is offering maximum incentive payments of up to $44,000 per physician (including radiologists) if they can meet all the requirements as laid down in the MU measures. Unfortunately, penalties will kick in if physicians are not compliant with MU by 2015. This will be done in at least three stages, with Stage 1 already in effect (as of January 3, 2011). This will be the first in a series of articles outlining MU and what is in store for radiology. We will go in depth about who is eligible, and how the payment schedule is set up. We will break down the core and menu set measures to suggest what can be excluded by most radiologists. We will also go through some case studies and examine what lies in store for radiology.

Key Words: Meaningful use, CMS, electronic health record (EHR), health information technology (HIT) clinical workflow, productivity, incentive payments, exclusions

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

 Special acknowledgement to the American College of Radiology and Michael Peters for their tremendous help with this article.

PII: S1076-6332(11)00557-5

doi:10.1016/j.acra.2011.11.008

Academic Radiology
Volume 19, Issue 2 , Pages 221-228, February 2012