Advertisement

Online Social Networking for Radiology

Published:September 25, 2014DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2014.07.021
      Online social networking services have changed the way we interact as a society and offer many opportunities to improve the way we practice radiology and medicine in general. This article begins with an introduction to social networking. Next, the latest advances in online social networking are reviewed, and areas where radiologists and clinicians may benefit from these new tools are discussed. This article concludes with several steps that the interested reader can take to become more involved in online social networking.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Academic Radiology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

      1. Social networking service. Available at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_networking_service. Accessed 12/11/2013.

        • Livingstone S.
        • Brake D.R.
        On the rapid rise of social networking sites: new findings and policy implications.
        Children & society. 2010; 24: 75-83
      2. Suddenly, Google Plus is outpacing Twitter to become the world's second largest social network. Available at: http://www.businessinsider.com/google-plus-is-outpacing-twitter-2013-5. Accessed 6/4/2014.

        • Bosslet G.T.
        • Torke A.M.
        • Hickman S.E.
        • et al.
        The patient-doctor relationship and online social networks: results of a national survey.
        J Gen Intern Med. 2011; 26: 1168-1174
        • Ratib O.
        • Rosset A.
        • Heuberger J.
        Open Source software and social networks: disruptive alternatives for medical imaging.
        Eur J Radiol. 2011; 78: 259-265
        • McGowan B.S.
        • Wasko M.
        • Vartabedian B.S.
        • et al.
        Understanding the factors that influence the adoption and meaningful use of social media by physicians to share medical information.
        J Med Internet Res. 2012; 14
        • Rowell M.R.
        • Johnson P.T.
        • Fishman E.K.
        Radiology education in 2005: World Wide Web practice patterns, perceptions, and preferences of radiologists1.
        Radiographics. 2007; 27: 563-571
        • Wasserman S.
        • Faust K.
        Social network analysis: methods and applications.
        Cambridge University Press, 1994
        • Kadushin C.
        Understanding social networks: theories, concepts, and findings.
        Oxford University Press, Oxford2012
        • Granovetter M.
        The strength of weak ties.
        Am J Sociol. 1973; 78: 1360-1380
        • Uzzi B.
        Embeddedness in the making of financial capital: How social relations and networks benefit firms seeking financing.
        Am Soc Rev. 1999; : 481-505
        • Reiner B.
        • Siegel E.
        • Protopapas Z.
        • et al.
        Impact of filmless radiology on frequency of clinician consultations with radiologists.
        AJR. Am J Roentgenol. 1999; 173: 1169-1172
        • Tillack A.A.
        • Breiman R.S.
        Renegotiating expertise: an examination of PACS and the challenges to radiology using a medical anthropologic approach.
        J Am Coll Radiol. 2012; 9: 64-68
        • Hawkins C.M.
        • Duszak R.
        • Rawson J.V.
        Social media in radiology: early trends in Twitter microblogging at radiology's largest international meeting.
        J Am Coll Radiol. 2014; 11: 387-390
        • Choy G.
        • Krishnaraj A.
        • Uppot R.
        • et al.
        Patient-centered radiology: radiologists answering patient questions via electronic messaging.
        (Chicago, IL)2011
        • vanSonnenberg C.
        Radiology practices reap social media dividends.
        2011
        • Prasanna P.M.
        • Seagull F.J.
        • Nagy P.
        Online social networking: a primer for radiology.
        J Digit Imaging. 2011; 24: 908-912
        • Miller P.
        • Gunderman R.
        • Lightburn J.
        • et al.
        Enhancing patients' experiences in radiology: through patient-radiologist interaction.
        Acad Radiol. 2013; 20: 778-781
        • Brown H.
        History and the learned journal.
        J Hist Ideas. 1972; 33: 365-378
      3. ResearchGate, About Us. Available at: http://www.researchgate.net/about. Accessed 11/23/2013.

        • Sweeney L.
        Simple demographics often identify people uniquely.
        Pittsburgh Carnegie Mellon University, 2000
        • Choy G.
        • Pomerantz S.R.
        Net assets: the social web for radiology. Part II. Social networking for radiologists.
        Radiology. 2009; 252: 642-646
        • Jain S.
        • Roberts L.W.
        Ethics in psychotherapy: a focus on professional boundaries and confidentiality practices.
        The Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2009; 32: 299-314
        • Mansfield S.J.
        • Morrison S.G.
        • Stephens H.O.
        • et al.
        Social media and the medical profession.
        The Med J Aust. 2011; 194: 642-644
      4. LinkedIn, About Us. Available at: http://www.linkedin.com/about-us. Accessed 06/23/2014.