Enabling Comparative Effectiveness Research with Informatics

Show Me the Data!


      Both outcomes researchers and informaticians are concerned with information and data. As such, some of the central challenges to conducting successful comparative effectiveness research can be addressed with informatics solutions.


      Specific informatics solutions which address how data in comparative effectiveness research are enriched, stored, shared, and analyzed are reviewed.


      Imaging data can be made more quantitative, uniform, and structured for researchers through the use of lexicons and structured reporting. Secure and scalable storage of research data is enabled through data warehouses and cloud services. There are a number of national efforts to help researchers share research data and analysis tools.


      There is a diverse arsenal of informatics tools designed to meet the needs of comparative effective researchers.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Academic Radiology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Channin D.S.
        • Mongkolwat P.
        • Kleper V.
        • et al.
        The Annotation and Image Mark-up Project.
        Radiology. 2009; 253: 590-592
      1. RadLex: A lexicon for uniform indexing and retrieval of radiology information resources. Available at: Accessed October 28, 2010.

        • Kundu S.
        • Itkin M.
        • Gervais D.A.
        • et al.
        The IR RadLex Project: an interventional radiology lexicon-a collaborative project of the Radiological Society of North America and the Society of Interventional Radiology.
        J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009; 20: 433-435
      2. Rubin DL, Channin DS. The RadLex playbook: a nomenclature for radiological imaging (LL-INE2503). Presented at the 96th Scientific Assembly and Annual Meeting of the Radiological Society of North America; 2010 Nov 28–Dec 3, Chicago, IL.

      3. Radiology reporting. Available at: Accessed October 28, 2010.

        • Dang P.A.
        • Kalra M.K.
        • Blake M.A.
        • et al.
        Extraction of recommendation features in radiology with natural language processing: exploratory study.
        Am J. Roentgenol. 2008; 191: 313-320
        • Thomas B.J.
        • Ouellette H.
        • Halpern E.F.
        • et al.
        Automated computer-assisted categorization of radiology reports.
        Am J Roentgenol. 2005; 184: 687-690
        • Hripcsak G.
        • Austin J.H.M.
        • Alderson P.O.
        • et al.
        Use of natural language processing to translate clinical information from a database of 889,921 chest radiographic reports.
        Radiology. 2002; 224: 157-163
        • Minati L.
        • Ghielmetti F.
        • Ciobanu V.
        • et al.
        Bio-image warehouse system: concept and implementation of a diagnosis-based data warehouse for advanced imaging modalities in neuroradiology.
        J Digit Imaging. 2007; 20: 32-41
        • Wong S.T.C.
        • Hoo K.S.
        • Knowlton R.C.
        • et al.
        Design and applications of a multimodality image data warehouse framework.
        J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2002; 9: 239-254
        • Erdal S.
        • Rogers P.
        • Santangelo J.
        • et al.
        Data delivery workflow in an academic information warehouse.
        AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2008; : 942
        • Schubart J.
        Evaluation of a data warehouse in an academic health sciences center.
        Int J Medical Informatics. 2000; 60: 319-333
        • Rubin D.
        • Desser T.
        A data warehouse for integrating radiologic and pathologic data.
        J Amer Coll Radiol. 2008; 5: 210-217
        • Andriole K.P.
        • Khorasani R.
        Cloud computing: what is it and could it be useful?.
        J Amer Coll Radiol. 2010; 7: 252-254
      4. CIP Survey of Biomedical Imaging Archives - Imaging - Cancer Imaging Program - National Cancer Institute - Confluence Wiki. Available at: Accessed October 27, 2010.

      5. National Biomedical Imaging Archive. Available at: Accessed October 28, 2010.

      6. XNAT. Available at: Accessed October 28, 2010.

        • Marcus D.S.
        • Olsen T.R.
        • Ramaratnam M.
        • et al.
        The Extensible Neuroimaging Archive Toolkit: an informatics platform for managing, exploring, and sharing neuroimaging data.
        Neuroinformatics. 2007; 5: 11-34
      7. MRI Study of Normal Brain Development. Available at: Accessed October 28, 2010.

        • Leader J.K.
        Pulmonary nodule detection with low-dose CT of the lung: agreement among radiologists.
        Amer J Roentgenol. 2005; 185: 973-978
        • Federle M.P.
        • Pan K.
        • Pealer K.M.
        CT criteria for differentiating abdominal hemorrhage: anticoagulation or aortic aneurysm rupture?.
        AJR Amer J Roentgenol. 2007; 188: 1324-1330
        • Boyd A.
        • Hosner C.
        • Hunscher D.
        • et al.
        An ‘honest broker’ mechanism to maintain privacy for patient care and academic medical research.
        Int J Med Inform. 2007; 76: 407-411
        • Boyd A.D.
        • Saxman P.R.
        • Hunscher D.A.
        • et al.
        The University of Michigan honest broker: a web-based service for clinical and translational research and practice.
        J Amer Med Inform Assoc. 2009; 16: 784-791
        • Dhir R.
        • Patel A.A.
        • Winters S.
        • et al.
        A multidisciplinary approach to honest broker services for tissue banks and clinical data.
        Cancer. 2008; 113: 1705-1715
      8. BIRN – Biomedical Informatics Research Network | The Conduit for Biomedical Research. Available at: Accessed October 28, 2010.

      9. caGrid and Infrastructure Overview. Available at:–07–07.4911641845&sid=caGrid&status=True. Accessed October 28, 2010.

      10. National Radiology Data Registry (NRDR). Available at: Accessed October 28, 2010.

        • Lindsay M.J.
        • Siegel B.A.
        • Tunis S.R.
        • et al.
        The National Oncologic PET Registry: expanded medicare coverage for PET under coverage with evidence development.
        AJR Amer J Roentgenol. 2007; 188: 1109-1113
      11. ROC Analysis. Web-based Calculator for ROC Curves. Available at: Accessed October 28, 2010.

      12. 3D Slicer. Available at: Accessed October 28, 2010.

        • Elshaug A.G.
        • Bessen T.
        • Moss J.R.
        • et al.
        Addressing “waste” in diagnostic imaging: some implications of comparative effectiveness research.
        J Amer Coll Radiol. 2010; 7: 603-613
        • Pandharipande P.V.
        • Gazelle G.S.
        Comparative effectiveness research: what it means for radiology.
        Radiology. 2009; 253: 600-605