Advertisement

A Workflow to Improve the Alignment of Prostate Imaging with Whole-mount Histopathology

      Rationale and Objectives

      Evaluation of prostate imaging tests against whole-mount histology specimens requires accurate alignment between radiologic and histologic data sets. Misalignment results in false-positive and -negative zones as assessed by imaging. We describe a workflow for three-dimensional alignment of prostate imaging data against whole-mount prostatectomy reference specimens and assess its performance against a standard workflow.

      Materials and Methods

      Ethical approval was granted. Patients underwent motorized transrectal ultrasound (Prostate Histoscanning) to generate a three-dimensional image of the prostate before radical prostatectomy. The test workflow incorporated steps for axial alignment between imaging and histology, size adjustments following formalin fixation, and use of custom-made parallel cutters and digital caliper instruments. The control workflow comprised freehand cutting and assumed homogeneous block thicknesses at the same relative angles between pathology and imaging sections.

      Results

      Thirty radical prostatectomy specimens were histologically and radiologically processed, either by an alignment-optimized workflow (n = 20) or a control workflow (n = 10). The optimized workflow generated tissue blocks of heterogeneous thicknesses but with no significant drifting in the cutting plane. The control workflow resulted in significantly nonparallel blocks, accurately matching only one out of four histology blocks to their respective imaging data. The image-to-histology alignment accuracy was 20% greater in the optimized workflow (P < .0001), with higher sensitivity (85% vs. 69%) and specificity (94% vs. 73%) for margin prediction in a 5 × 5-mm grid analysis.

      Conclusions

      A significantly better alignment was observed in the optimized workflow. Evaluation of prostate imaging biomarkers using whole-mount histology references should include a test-to-reference spatial alignment workflow.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Academic Radiology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Rosenkrantz A.B.
        • Mannelli L.
        • Kong X.
        • et al.
        Prostate cancer: utility of fusion of T2-weighted and high b-value diffusion-weighted images for peripheral zone tumor detection and localization.
        J Magn Reson Imaging. 2011; 34: 95-100
        • Jackson A.S.
        • Reinsberg S.A.
        • Sohaib S.A.
        • et al.
        Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for prostate cancer localization.
        Br J Radiol. 2009; 82: 148-156
        • Hambrock T.
        • Somford D.M.
        • Huisman H.J.
        • et al.
        Relationship between apparent diffusion coefficients at 3.0-T MR imaging and Gleason grade in peripheral zone prostate cancer.
        Radiology. 2011; 259: 453-461
        • Delongchamps N.B.
        • Rouanne M.
        • Flam T.
        • et al.
        Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for the detection and localization of prostate cancer: combination of T2-weighted, dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted imaging.
        BJU Int. 2011; 107: 1411-1418
        • Vargas H.A.
        • Akin O.
        • Franiel T.
        • et al.
        Diffusion-weighted endorectal MR imaging at 3 T for prostate cancer: tumor detection and assessment of aggressiveness.
        Radiology. 2011; 259: 775-784
        • Bossuyt P.M.
        • Reitsma J.B.
        • Bruns D.E.
        • et al.
        Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative.
        BMJ. 2003; 326: 41-44
        • Ashburner J.
        • Fristo K.J.
        Chapter 2, “Rigid Body Registration”. Human brain function.
        2 ed. Academic Press, 2004
        • Salomon G.
        • Spethmann J.
        • Beckmann A.
        • et al.
        Accuracy of HistoScanning for the prediction of a negative surgical margin in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy.
        BJU Int. 2013; 111: 60-66
        • Simmons L.A.
        • Autier P.
        • Zat'ura F.
        • et al.
        Detection, localisation and characterisation of prostate cancer by prostate HistoScanning(™).
        BJU Int. 2012; 110: 28-35
        • Braeckman J.
        • Autier P.
        • Soviany C.
        • et al.
        The accuracy of transrectal ultrasonography supplemented with computer-aided ultrasonography for detecting small prostate cancers.
        BJU Int. 2008; 102: 1560-1565
        • Montironi R.
        • van der Kwast T.
        • Boccon-Gibod L.
        • et al.
        Handling and pathology reporting of radical prostatectomy specimens.
        Eur Urol. 2003; 44: 626-636
        • Dickinson L.
        • Ahmed H.U.
        • Allen C.
        • et al.
        Magnetic resonance imaging for the detection, localisation, and characterisation of prostate cancer: recommendations from a European consensus meeting.
        Eur Urol. 2011; 59: 477-494
        • Schatzkin A.
        • Gail M.
        The promise and peril of surrogate end points in cancer research.
        Nat Rev Cancer. 2002; 2: 19-27
        • McClure T.D.
        • Margolis D.J.
        • Reiter R.E.
        • et al.
        Use of MR imaging to determine preservation of the neurovascular bundles at robotic-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy.
        Radiology. 2012; 262: 874-883
        • Arumainayagam N.
        • Ahmed H.U.
        • Moore C.M.
        • et al.
        Multiparametric MR imaging for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer: a validation cohort study with transperineal template prostate mapping as the reference standard.
        Radiology. 2013; 268: 761-769
        • Bubley G.J.
        • Bloch B.N.
        • Vazquez C.
        • et al.
        Accuracy of endorectal magnetic resonance/transrectal ultrasound fusion for detection of prostate cancer during brachytherapy.
        Urology. 2013; 81: 1284-1289
        • Gangi A.
        • Tsoumakidou G.
        • Abdelli O.
        • et al.
        Percutaneous MR-guided cryoablation of prostate cancer: initial experience.
        Eur Radiol. 2012; 22: 1829-1835
        • Niaf E.
        • Rouviere O.
        • Mege-Lechevallier F.
        • et al.
        Computer-aided diagnosis of prostate cancer in the peripheral zone using multiparametric MRI.
        Phys Med Biol. 2012; 57: 3833-3851
        • Braeckman J.
        • Autier P.
        • Garbar C.
        • et al.
        Computer-aided ultrasonography (HistoScanning): a novel technology for locating and characterizing prostate cancer.
        BJU Int. 2008; 101: 293-298
        • Tamada T.
        • Sone T.
        • Jo Y.
        • et al.
        Prostate cancer: relationships between postbiopsy hemorrhage and tumor detectability at MR diagnosis.
        Radiology. 2008; 248: 531-539
        • Bloch B.N.
        • Furman-Haran E.
        • Helbich T.H.
        • et al.
        Prostate cancer: accurate determination of extracapsular extension with high-spatial-resolution dynamic contrast-enhanced and T2-weighted MR imaging–initial results.
        Radiology. 2007; 245: 176-185
        • Selnaes K.M.
        • Heerschap A.
        • Jensen L.R.
        • et al.
        Peripheral zone prostate cancer localization by multiparametric magnetic resonance at 3 T: unbiased cancer identification by matching to histopathology.
        Invest Radiol. 2012; 47: 624-633
        • Wu L.M.
        • Xu J.R.
        • Ye Y.Q.
        • et al.
        The clinical value of diffusion-weighted imaging in combination with T2-weighted imaging in diagnosing prostate carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012; 199: 103-110
        • Mowatt G.
        • Scotland G.
        • Boachie C.
        • et al.
        The diagnostic accuracy and cost-effectiveness of magnetic resonance spectroscopy and enhanced magnetic resonance imaging techniques in aiding the localisation of prostate abnormalities for biopsy: a systematic review and economic evaluation.
        Health Technol Assess. 2013; 17 (1–281): vii-xix
        • Egevad L.
        • Algaba F.
        • Berney D.M.
        • et al.
        Handling and reporting of radical prostatectomy specimens in Europe: a web-based survey by the European Network of Uropathology (ENUP).
        Histopathology. 2008; 53: 333-339
        • Riches S.F.
        • Payne G.S.
        • Morgan V.A.
        • et al.
        MRI in the detection of prostate cancer: combined apparent diffusion coefficient, metabolite ratio, and vascular parameters.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009; 193: 1583-1591
        • Mena E.
        • Turkbey B.
        • Mani H.
        • et al.
        11C-Acetate PET/CT in localized prostate cancer: a study with MRI and histopathologic correlation.
        J Nucl Med. 2012; 53: 538-545
        • Shah V.
        • Turkbey B.
        • Mani H.
        • et al.
        Decision support system for localizing prostate cancer based on multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging.
        Med Phys. 2012; 39: 4093-4103
        • Drew B.
        • Jones E.C.
        • Reinsberg S.
        • et al.
        Device for sectioning prostatectomy specimens to facilitate comparison between histology and in vivo MRI.
        JMRI. 2010; 32: 992-996
        • Jhavar S.G.
        • Fisher C.
        • Jackson A.
        • et al.
        Processing of radical prostatectomy specimens for correlation of data from histopathological, molecular biological, and radiological studies: a new whole organ technique.
        J clin pathol. 2005; 58: 504-508
        • Shah V.
        • Pohida T.
        • Turkbey B.
        • et al.
        A method for correlating in vivo prostate magnetic resonance imaging and histopathology using individualized magnetic resonance-based molds.
        Rev Sci Instrum. 2009; 80: 104301
        • Jager G.J.
        • Ruijter E.T.
        • van de Kaa C.A.
        • et al.
        Local staging of prostate cancer with endorectal MR imaging: correlation with histopathology.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996; 166: 845-852
        • Lencioni R.
        • Menchi I.
        • Paolicchi A.
        • et al.
        Prediction of pathological tumor volume in clinically localized prostate cancer: value of endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging.
        Magma. 1997; 5: 117-121
        • Sommer F.G.
        • Nghiem H.V.
        • Herfkens R.
        • et al.
        Determining the volume of prostatic carcinoma: value of MR imaging with an external-array coil.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993; 161: 81-86
        • Schiebler M.L.
        • Tomaszewski J.E.
        • Bezzi M.
        • et al.
        Prostatic carcinoma and benign prostatic hyperplasia: correlation of high-resolution MR and histopathologic findings.
        Radiology. 1989; 172: 131-137
        • Kimm S.Y.
        • Tarin T.V.
        • Lee J.H.
        • et al.
        Methods for registration of magnetic resonance images of ex vivo prostate specimens with histology.
        JMRI. 2012; 36: 206-212
        • Hughes C.
        • Rouviere O.
        • Mege-Lechevallier F.
        • et al.
        Robust alignment of prostate histology slices with quantified accuracy.
        IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2013; 60: 281-291