Imaging–Histologic Discordance at Percutaneous Biopsy of the Lung

Published:January 16, 2015DOI:

      Rationale and Objectives

      The purpose of this study was to quantify the degree of imaging–histologic discordance in a cohort of patients undergoing computed tomography (CT)–guided lung biopsy for focal lung disease.

      Materials and Methods

      A retrospective review was performed of 186 patients who underwent percutaneous lung biopsy of a parenchymal lesion at our institution between January and December 2009. Diagnostic radiology reports of CT or positron emission tomography–CTs performed before biopsy were used to classify the lesion as malignant or benign by five readers. Pathology reports of the biopsied lesions were classified by three readers. Inter-reader agreement and imaging–histologic concordance were quantified using kappa statistics. Discordant benign cases were then revisited to determine downstream effects.


      Inter-reader agreement on report content was substantial or almost perfect with kappas >0.783. Kappas for concordance were as follows: malignant (0.448), primary lung cancer (0.517), metastatic disease to lung (0.449), benign (0.510), and overall agreement (0.381). Of the twelve discordant benign cases that were revisited, four were found to be false negatives, resulting in a delay in diagnosis.


      Our study of imaging–histologic discordance in percutaneous biopsy of lung lesions supports the need for imaging report standardization and improved integration and communication between the fields of radiology and pathology.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Academic Radiology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Sorace J.
        • Aberle D.R.
        • Elimama D.
        • et al.
        Integrating pathology and radiology disciplines: an emerging opportunity?.
        BMC Med. 2012; 10: 100
        • Koo H.J.
        • Choi H.J.
        • Kim M.
        • et al.
        Radiologic–pathologic correlation of renal cell carcinoma associated with Xp11. 2 translocation.
        Acta Radiol. 2013; 54: 827-834
        • Kuriyama K.
        • Tateishi R.
        • Doi O.
        • et al.
        CT-pathologic correlation in small peripheral lung cancers.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1987; 149: 1139-1143
        • Varma D.G.
        • Ayala A.G.
        • Carrasco C.H.
        • et al.
        Chondrosarcoma: MR imaging with pathologic correlation.
        Radiographics. 1992; 12: 687-704
        • Bhartia B.
        • Ward J.
        • Guthrie J.A.
        • et al.
        Hepatocellular carcinoma in cirrhotic livers: double-contrast thin-section MR imaging with pathologic correlation of explanted tissue.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003; 180: 577-584
        • Lee K.S.
        • Im J.G.
        • Choe K.O.
        • et al.
        CT findings in benign fibrous mesothelioma of the pleura: pathologic correlation in nine patients.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1992; 158: 983-986
        • Maetani Y.
        • Itoh K.
        • Egawa H.
        • et al.
        benign hepatic nodules in Budd–Chiari syndrome: radiologic–pathologic correlation with emphasis on the central scar.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002; 178: 869-875
        • Atkins K.A.
        • Cohen M.A.
        • Nicholson B.
        • et al.
        Atypical lobular hyperplasia and lobular carcinoma in situ at core breast biopsy: use of careful radiologic–pathologic correlation to recommend excision or observation.
        Radiology. 2013; 269: 340-347
        • Parikh J.
        • Tickman R.
        Image-guided tissue sampling: where radiology meets pathology.
        Breast J. 2005; 11: 403-409
        • Liberman L.
        • Drotman M.
        • Morris E.A.
        • et al.
        Imaging–histologic discordance at percutaneous breast biopsy.
        Cancer. 2000; 89: 2538-2546
        • Lee J.M.
        • Kaplan J.B.
        • Murray M.P.
        • et al.
        Imaging–histologic discordance at MRI-guided 9-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007; 189: 852-859
        • Liberman L.
        • Dershaw D.D.
        • Glassman J.R.
        • et al.
        Analysis of cancers not diagnosed at stereotactic core breast biopsy.
        Radiology. 1997; 203: 151-157
        • Dillon M.F.
        • Hill A.D.K.
        • Quinn C.M.
        • et al.
        The accuracy of ultrasound, stereotactic, and clinical core biopsies in the diagnosis of breast cancer, with an analysis of false-negative cases.
        Ann Surg. 2005; 242: 701
        • Youk J.H.
        • Kim E.K.
        • Kim M.J.
        • et al.
        Missed breast cancers at US-guided core needle biopsy: how to reduce them.
        Radiographics. 2007; 27: 79-94
        • Sobel J.L.
        • Pearson M.L.
        • Gross K.
        • et al.
        Information content and clarity of radiologists' reports for chest radiography.
        Acad Radiol. 1996; 3: 709-717
        • Berlin L.
        Pitfalls of the vague radiology report.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000; 174: 1511-1518
      1. (2010) The Importance of Radiology and Pathology Communication in the Diagnosis and Staging of Cancer: Mammography as a Case Study.

        • Team, R.D.C
        R: a language and environment for statistical computing.
        R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria2008
        • Kundel H.L.
        • Polansky M.
        Measurement of observer agreement.
        Radiology. 2003; 228: 303-308
        • Enzmann D.R.
        Radiology's value chain.
        Radiology. 2012; 263: 243-252
        • Lee J.K.
        Quality—a radiology imperative: interpretation accuracy and pertinence.
        J Am Coll Radiol. 2007; 4: 162-165
        • Tot T.
        • Gere M.
        Radiological–pathological correlation in diagnosing breast carcinoma: the role of pathology in the multimodality era.
        Pathol Oncol Res. 2008; 14: 173-178
        • Khorasani R.
        • Bates D.W.
        • Teeger S.
        • et al.
        Is terminology used effectively to convey diagnostic certainty in radiology reports?.
        Acad Radiol. 2003; 10: 685-688