A Web-based System for Integrating and Correlating Radiology and Pathology Findings During Cancer Diagnosis
Published:October 27, 2015DOI:

      Rationale and Objectives

      The current paradigm of cancer diagnosis involves uncoordinated communication of findings from radiology and pathology to downstream physicians. Discordance between these findings can require additional time from downstream users to resolve, or given incorrect resolution, may adversely impact treatment decisions. To mitigate this problem, we developed a web-based system, called RadPath, for correlating and integrating radiology and pathology reporting.

      Materials and Methods

      RadPath includes interfaces to our institution's clinical information systems, which are used to retrieve reports, images, and test results that are structured into an interactive compendium for a diagnostic patient case. The system includes an editing interface for physicians, allowing for the inclusion of additional clinical data, as well as the ability to retrospectively correlate and contextualize imaging findings following pathology diagnosis.


      During pilot deployment and testing over the course of 1 year, physicians at our institution have completed 60 RadPath cases, requiring an average of 128 seconds from a radiologist and an average of 93 seconds from a pathologist per case. Several technical and workflow challenges were encountered during development, including interfacing with diverse clinical information systems, automatically structuring report contents, and determining the appropriate physicians to create RadPath summaries. Reaction to RadPath has been positive, with users valuing the system's ability to consolidate diagnostic information.


      With the increasing complexity of medicine and the movement toward team-based disease management, there is a need for improved clinical communication and information exchange. RadPath provides a platform for generating coherent and correlated diagnostic summaries in cancer diagnosis with minimal additional effort from physicians.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Academic Radiology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Miniño A.M.
        • Murphy S.L.
        • Xu J.
        • et al.
        Deaths: final data for 2008.
        Nat Vital Stat Rep. 2011; 59
        • Liberman L.
        • Drotman M.
        • Morris E.A.
        • et al.
        Imaging-histologic discordance at percutaneous breast biopsy.
        Cancer. 2000; 89: 2538-2546
        • Takao M.
        • Fukuda T.
        • Iwanaga S.
        • et al.
        Gastric cancer: evaluation of triphasic spiral CT and radiologic-pathologic correlation.
        J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1998; 22: 288-294
        • Maetani Y.
        • Itoh K.
        • Egawa H.
        • et al.
        Benign hepatic nodules in Budd-Chiari syndrome: radiologic–pathologic correlation with emphasis on the central scar.
        Am J Roentgenol. 2002; 178: 869-875
        • Kuriyama K.
        • Tateishi R.
        • Doi O.
        • et al.
        CT-pathologic correlation in small peripheral lung cancers.
        Am J Roentgenol. 1987; 149: 1139-1143
        • Koo H.J.
        • Choi H.J.
        • Kim M.-H.
        • et al.
        Radiologic–pathologic correlation of renal cell carcinoma associated with Xp11. 2 translocation.
        Acta Radiol. 2013; 54: 827-834
        • Varma D.
        • Ayala A.
        • Carrasco C.
        • et al.
        Chondrosarcoma: MR imaging with pathologic correlation.
        Radiographics. 1992; 12: 687-704
        • Khurana B.
        • Mortelé K.J.
        • Glickman J.
        • et al.
        Macrocystic serous adenoma of the pancreas: radiologic–pathologic correlation.
        Am J Roentgenol. 2003; 181: 119-123
        • Sorace J.
        • Aberle D.R.
        • Elimam D.
        • et al.
        Integrating pathology and radiology disciplines: an emerging opportunity?.
        BMC Med. 2012; 10: 100
        • Shah V.I.
        • Raju U.
        • Chitale D.
        • et al.
        False-negative core needle biopsies of the breast.
        Cancer. 2003; 97: 1824-1831
        • Kim M.J.
        • Kim E.-K.
        • Park S.Y.
        • et al.
        Imaging-histologic discordance at sonographically guided percutaneous biopsy of breast lesions.
        Eur J Radiol. 2008; 65: 163-169
        • Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation
        The importance of radiology and pathology communication in the diagnosis and staging of cancer: mammography as a case study.
        US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC2010
        • Crowe Jr, J.P.
        • Patrick R.J.
        • Rybicki L.A.
        • et al.
        Does ultrasound core breast biopsy predict histologic finding on excisional biopsy?.
        Am J Surg. 2003; 186: 397-399
        • Jackman R.J.
        • Marzoni Jr, F.A.
        • Rosenberg J.
        False-negative diagnoses at stereotactic vacuum-assisted needle breast biopsy: long-term follow-up of 1,280 lesions and review of the literature.
        Am J Roentgenol. 2009; 192: 341-351
        • Dillon M.F.
        • Hill A.D.
        • Quinn C.M.
        • et al.
        The accuracy of ultrasound, stereotactic, and clinical core biopsies in the diagnosis of breast cancer, with an analysis of false-negative cases.
        Ann Surg. 2005; 242: 701
        • Pfarl G.
        • Helbich T.H.
        • Riedl C.C.
        • et al.
        Stereotactic 11-gauge vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: a validation study.
        Am J Roentgenol. 2002; 179: 1503-1507
        • Schueller G.
        • Jaromi S.
        • Ponhold L.
        • et al.
        US-guided 14-gauge core-needle breast biopsy: results of a validation study in 1352 cases.
        Radiology. 2008; 248: 406-413
        • Mariotto A.B.
        • Robin Yabroff K.
        • Shao Y.
        • et al.
        Projections of the cost of cancer care in the United States: 2010–2020.
        J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011; 103: 117-128
        • Mihalik J.E.
        • Krupka L.
        • Davenport R.
        • et al.
        The rate of imaging-histologic discordance of benign breast disease: a multidisciplinary approach to the management of discordance at a large university-based hospital.
        Am J Surg. 2010; 199: 319-323
        • Fader D.J.
        • Wise C.G.
        • Normolle D.P.
        • et al.
        The multidisciplinary melanoma clinic: a cost outcomes analysis of specialty care.
        J Am Acad Dermatol. 1998; 38: 742-751
        • IOM (Institute of Medicine)
        Best care at lower cost: the path to continuously learning health care in America.
        National Academies Press, Washington, DC2012
        • National Research Council
        Toward precision medicine: building a knowledge network for biomedical research and a new taxonomy of disease.
        National Academies Press, Washington, DC2011
        • Tawfik O.
        • Redick M.
        Joint radiologist-pathologist review of diagnostic findings improves care of patients being screened for breast cancer.
        (AHRQ Service Delivery Innovation Profile)2010
        • Oh A.S.
        • Arnold C.W.
        • Vangala S.
        • et al.
        Imaging-histologic discordance at percutaneous biopsy of the lung.
        Acad Radiol. 2015; 22: 481-487
        • Sutton C.
        • McCallum A.
        An introduction to conditional random fields for relational learning.
        Introd Stat Relat Learn. 2006; : 93-128