Advertisement

Breast Density Estimation with Fully Automated Volumetric Method:

Comparison to Radiologists' Assessment by BI-RADS Categories
Published:October 27, 2015DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2015.09.012

      Rationale and Objectives

      The objective of our study was to calculate mammographic breast density with a fully automated volumetric breast density measurement method and to compare it to breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) breast density categories assigned by two radiologists.

      Materials and Methods

      A total of 476 full-field digital mammography examinations with standard mediolateral oblique and craniocaudal views were evaluated by two blinded radiologists and BI-RADS density categories were assigned. Using a fully automated software, mean fibroglandular tissue volume, mean breast volume, and mean volumetric breast density were calculated. Based on percentage volumetric breast density, a volumetric density grade was assigned from 1 to 4.

      Results

      The weighted overall kappa was 0.895 (almost perfect agreement) for the two radiologists' BI-RADS density estimates. A statistically significant difference was seen in mean volumetric breast density among the BI-RADS density categories. With increased BI-RADS density category, increase in mean volumetric breast density was also seen (P < 0.001). A significant positive correlation was found between BI-RADS categories and volumetric density grading by fully automated software (ρ = 0.728, P < 0.001 for first radiologist and ρ = 0.725, P < 0.001 for second radiologist). Pairwise estimates of the weighted kappa between Volpara density grade and BI-RADS density category by two observers showed fair agreement (κ = 0.398 and 0.388, respectively).

      Conclusions

      In our study, a good correlation was seen between density grading using fully automated volumetric method and density grading using BI-RADS density categories assigned by the two radiologists. Thus, the fully automated volumetric method may be used to quantify breast density on routine mammography.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Academic Radiology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Mainiero M.B.
        • Lourenco A.
        • Mahoney M.C.
        • et al.
        ACR Appropriateness Criteria breast cancer screening.
        J Am Coll Radiol. 2013; 10: 11-14
        • Boyd N.F.
        • Guo H.
        • Martin L.J.
        • et al.
        Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer.
        N Engl J Med. 2007; 356: 227-236
        • Van Gils C.
        • Otten J.D.
        • Verbeek A.L.
        • et al.
        Mammographic breast density and risk of breast cancer: masking bias or causality?.
        Eur J Epidemiol. 1998; 14: 315-320
        • Mandelson M.T.
        • Oestreicher N.
        • Porter P.L.
        • et al.
        Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of interval- and screen-detected cancers.
        J Natl Cancer Inst. 2000; 92 (Review): 1081-1087
        • Boyd N.F.
        • Martin L.J.
        • Yaffe M.J.
        • et al.
        Mammographic density and breast cancer risk: current understanding and future prospects.
        Breast Cancer Res. 2011; 13: 223
        • McCormack V.A.
        • dos Santos Silva I.
        Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis.
        Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006; 15: 1159-1169
        • Vachon C.M.
        • van Gils C.H.
        • Sellers T.A.
        • et al.
        Mammographic density, breast cancer risk and risk prediction.
        Breast Cancer Res. 2007; 9: 217
        • Bertrand K.A.
        • Tamimi R.M.
        • Scott C.G.
        • et al.
        Mammographic density and risk of breast cancer by age and tumour characteristics.
        Breast Cancer Res. 2013; 15: R104https://doi.org/10.1186/bcr3570
        • Kerlikowske K.
        • Grady D.
        • Barclay J.
        • et al.
        Variability and accuracy in mammographic interpretation using the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System.
        J Natl Cancer Inst. 1998; 90: 1801-1809
        • Berg W.A.
        • Campassi C.
        • Langenberg P.
        • et al.
        Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: inter- and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000; 174: 1769-1777
        • Martin K.E.
        • Helvie M.A.
        • Zhou C.
        • et al.
        Mammographic density measured with quantitative computer-aided method: comparison with radiologists' estimates and BI-RADS categories.
        Radiology. 2006; 240: 656-665
        • Spayne M.C.
        • Gard C.C.
        • Skelly J.
        • et al.
        Reproducibility of BI-RADS breast density measures among community radiologists: a prospective cohort study.
        Breast J. 2012; 18: 326-333
        • Byng J.W.
        • Boyd N.F.
        • Fishell E.
        • et al.
        The quantitative analysis of mammographic densities.
        Phys Med Biol. 1994; 39: 1629-1638
        • Sivaramakrishna R.
        • Obuchowski N.A.
        • Chilcote W.A.
        • et al.
        Automatic segmentation of mammographic density.
        Acad Radiol. 2001; 8: 250-256
        • Prevrhal S.
        • Shepherd J.
        • Smith-Bindman R.
        • et al.
        Accuracy of mammographic breast density analysis: results of formal operator training.
        Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2002; 11: 1389-1393
        • Shepherd J.A.
        • Kerlikowske K.
        • Ma L.
        • et al.
        Volume of mammographic density and risk of breast cancer.
        Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2011; 20: 1473-1482
        • Highnam R.
        • Pan X.
        • Warren R.
        • et al.
        Breast composition measurements using retrospective standard mammogram form (SMF).
        Phys Med Biol. 2006; 51: 2695-2713
        • Jeffreys M.
        • Warren R.
        • Highnam R.
        • et al.
        Initial experiences of using an automated volumetric measure of breast density: the standard mammogram form.
        Br J Radiol. 2006; 79: 378-382
        • Highnam R.P.
        • Brady J.M.
        • Shepstone B.J.
        Mammographic image analysis.
        Eur J Radiol. 1997; 24: 20-32
        • D'Orsi C.J.
        • Sickles E.A.
        • Mendelson E.B.
        • et al.
        ACR BI-RADS—breast imaging atlas, breast imaging reporting and data system.
        American College of Radiology, Reston, VA2013
        • Landis J.R.
        • Koch G.G.
        The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data.
        Biometrics. 1977; 33: 159-174
        • Harvey J.A.
        • Bovbjerg V.E.
        Quantitative assessment of mammographic breast density: relationship with breast cancer risk.
        Radiology. 2004; 230: 29-41
        • Gweon H.M.
        • Youk J.H.
        • Kim J.A.
        • et al.
        Radiologist assessment of breast density by BI-RADS categories versus fully automated volumetric assessment.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013; 201: 692-697
        • Seo J.M.
        • Ko E.S.
        • Han B.K.
        • et al.
        Automated volumetric breast density estimation: a comparison with visual assessment.
        Clin Radiol. 2013; 68: 690-695
        • McEntee M.F.
        • Damases C.N.
        Mammographic density measurement: a comparison of automated volumetric density measurement to BIRADS.
        Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2014; https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2042966
        • Ko S.Y.
        • Kim E.K.
        • Kim M.J.
        • et al.
        Mammographic density estimation with automated volumetric breast density measurement.
        Korean J Radiol. 2014; 15: 313-321
        • Tagliafico A.
        • Tagliafico G.
        • Tosto S.
        • et al.
        Mammographic density estimation: comparison among BI-RADS categories, a semi-automated software and a fully automated one.
        Breast. 2009; 18: 35-40
        • Gubern-Mérida A.
        • Kallenberg M.
        • Platel B.
        • et al.
        Volumetric breast density estimation from full field digital mammograms: a validation study.
        PLoS ONE. 2014; 9 (eCollection 2014): e85952https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0085952
        • Wang J.
        • Aziz A.
        • Newitt D.
        • et al.
        Comparison of Hologic's Quantra volumetric assessment to MRI breast density.
        in: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Breast Imaging, IWDM‘12. Springer-Verlag., Berlin, Heidelberg2012: 619-626
        • van Engeland S.
        • Snoeren P.R.
        • Huisman H.
        • et al.
        Volumetric breast density estimation from full-field digital mammograms.
        IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2006; 25: 273-282
        • Jeffreys M.
        • Harvey J.
        • Highnam R.
        Comparing a new volumetric breast density method (Volpara™) to Cumulus.
        in: Martı' J. IWDM'10: Proceedings of the 10th International Workshop on Digital Mammography. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg2010: 408-413
        • Bernardi D.1.
        • Pellegrini M.
        • Di Michele S.
        • et al.
        Interobserver agreement in breast radiological density attribution according to BI-RADS quantitative classification.
        Radiol Med. 2012; 117: 519-528
        • Eng A.
        • Gallant Z.
        • Shepherd J.
        • et al.
        Digital mammographic breast density and breast cancer risk: a case control study of six alternative density assessment methods.
        Breast Cancer Res. 2014; 16: 439
        • Stone J.
        • Warren R.M.
        • Pinney E.
        • et al.
        Determinants of percentage and area measures of mammographic density.
        Am J Epidemiol. 2009; 170: 1571-1578
        • Aitken Z.
        • McCormack V.A.
        • Highnam R.P.
        • et al.
        Screen-film mammographic density and breast cancer risk: a comparison of the volumetric standard mammogram form and the interactive threshold measurement methods.
        Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010; 19: 418-428
        • Jeffreys M.
        • Warren R.
        • Highnam R.
        • et al.
        Breast cancer risk factors and a novel measure of volumetric breast density: cross-sectional study.
        Br J Cancer. 2008; 98: 210-216