Advertisement
Original Investigation| Volume 23, ISSUE 2, P209-219, February 2016

Download started.

Ok

Impact of an Infant Transport Mattress on CT Dose and Image Quality

Published:November 25, 2015DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2015.10.011

      Rationale and Objectives

      Neonates are at increased risk for cold stress and hypothermia in cool environments. An infant transport mattress (ITM) is commonly used to increase neonate temperature during transport and has been used during CT scanning. This study determined the impact of an ITM on radiation dose and image artifacts during CT scanning.

      Materials and Methods

      CT images from a single clinical patient scanned with an ITM were reviewed, and observations of image artifacts were recorded. A phantom was scanned with and without the ITM while varying tube-current modulation, reconstruction method, slice thickness, metal reduction algorithm, tube voltage, and tube current. The effects of the ITM on computed tomography dose index (CTDIvol), mean Hounsfield unit (HU), and HU standard deviation were recorded.

      Results

      The clinical patient scan demonstrated significantly decreased mean HU and increased HU standard deviation. In the phantom, the ITM increased CTDIvol 27% and induced an artifact that decreased the mean HU by 3.5 HU and increased HU standard deviation by 4.6 HU. Angular tube-current modulation, strong iterative reconstruction, thick slices, metal artifact reduction, and high mA reduced the artifact.

      Conclusions

      Using ITM during CT scanning is not recommended given the relatively brief scanning time, increased dose, and induced image artifacts. Based on our results, several acquisition parameters may be altered to mitigate the image artifact if an ITM is required during scanning.

      Key Words

      Abbreviations and Acronyms:

      ITM (infant transport mattress), CT (computed tomography), AP (anteroposterior), CTDIvol (computed tomography dose index), ROI (region of interest), TCM (tube-current modulation), SSDE (size-specific dose estimate), HU (Hounsfield units)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Academic Radiology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Silverman W.A
        • Fertig J.W.
        • Berger A.P.
        The influence of the thermal environment upon the survival of newly born premature infants.
        Pediatrics. 1958; 22: 876-886
        • Almeida P.G.
        • Chandley J.
        • Davis J.
        • et al.
        Use of the heated gel mattress and its impact on admission temperature of very low birth-weight infants.
        Adv Neonatal Care. 2009; 9: 34-39
        • Buetow K.C.
        • Klein S.W.
        Effect of maintenance of “normal” skin temperature on survival of infants of low birth weight.
        Pediatrics. 1964; 34: 163-170
        • Day R.L.
        • Caliguiri L.
        • Kamenski C.
        • et al.
        Body temperature and survival of premature infants.
        Pediatrics. 1964; 34: 171-181
        • Russo A.
        • McCready M.
        • Torres L.
        • et al.
        Reducing hypothermia in preterm infants following delivery.
        Pediatrics. 2014; 133: e1055-e1062
        • Chawla S.
        • Amaram A.
        • Gopal S.P.
        • et al.
        Safety and efficacy of Trans-warmer mattress for preterm neonates: results of a randomized controlled trial.
        J Perinatol. 2011; 31: 780-784
        • Kattwinkel J.
        • Perlman J.M.
        • Aziz K.
        • et al.
        Part 15: Neonatal resuscitation 2010 American Heart Association Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care.
        Circulation. 2010; 122: S909-S919
        • Perlman J.M.
        • Wyllie J.
        • Kattwinkel J.
        • et al.
        Special report—neonatal resuscitation: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations.
        Circulation. 2010; 122: S516-S538
        • Godhamgaonkar A.
        • Parmar V.
        • Kyte E.
        • et al.
        The use of polythene bags for delivery-room thermoregulation in premature babies across England.
        Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2011; 96: Fa36
        • Marks K.
        • Maisels J.
        • Lee C.A.
        Temperature control during computerized tomography and in-hospital transport of low-birth-weight infants.
        Am J Dis Child. 1980; 134: 1176-1177
        • Coursey C.
        • Frush D.P.
        • Yoshizumi T.
        • et al.
        Pediatric chest MDCT using tube current modulation: effect on radiation dose with breast shielding.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008; 190: W54-W61
        • Rizzo S.M.
        • Kalra M.K.
        • Maher M.M.
        • et al.
        Do metallic endoprostheses increase radiation dose associated with automatic tube-current modulation in abdominal-pelvic MDCT? A phantom and patient study.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005; 184: 491-496
        • Boone J.M.
        • Strauss K.J.
        • Cody D.D.
        • et al.
        Size-specific dose estimates (SSDE) in pediatric and adult body CT examinations: Report of AAPM Task Group 204.
        (American Association of Physicists in Medicine, College Park, MD)2011
        • Kak A.C.
        • Slaney M.
        Aliasing artifacts and noise in CT images.
        in: Kak A.C. Slaney M. Principles of computerized tomographic imaging. IEEE Press, Piscataway Township, NJ1988: 177-201
        • Raman S.P.
        • Johnson P.T.
        • Deshmukh S.
        • et al.
        CT Dose reduction applications: available tools on the latest generation of CT scanners.
        J Am Coll Radiol. 2013; 10: 37-41