Improved Estimation of Coronary Plaque and Luminal Attenuation Using a Vendor-specific Model-based Iterative Reconstruction Algorithm in Contrast-enhanced CT Coronary Angiography

Published:April 07, 2017DOI:

      Rationale and Objectives

      To investigate the stabilities of plaque attenuation and coronary lumen for different plaque types, stenotic degrees, lumen densities, and reconstruction methods using coronary vessel phantoms and the visualization of coronary plaques in clinical patients through coronary computed tomography (CT) angiography.

      Materials and Methods

      We performed 320-detector volume scanning of vessel tubes with stenosis and a tube without stenosis using three types of plaque CT numbers. The stenotic degrees were 50% and 75%. Images were reconstructed with filtered back projection (FBP) and two types of iterative reconstructions (AIDR3D and FIRST [forward-projected model-based iterative reconstruction solution]), with stenotic CT number of approximately 40, 80, and 150 HU (Hounsfield unit), respectively. In each case, the tubing of the coronary vessel was filled with diluted contrast material and distilled water to reach the target lumen CT numbers of approximately 350 HU and 450 HU, and 0 HU, respectively. Peak lumen and plaque CT numbers were measured to calculate the lumen–plaque contrast. In addition, we retrospectively evaluated the image quality with regard to coronary arterial lumen and the plaque in 10 clinical patients on a 4-point scale.


      At 50% stenosis, the plaque CT number with contrast enhancement increased for FBP and AIDR3D, and the difference in the plaque CT number with and without contrast enhancement was 15–44 HU for FBP and 10–31 HU for AIDR3D. However, the plaque CT number for FIRST had a smaller variation and the difference with and without contrast enhancement was −12 to 8 HU. The visual evaluation score for the vessel lumen was 2.8 ± 0.6, 3.5 ± 0.5, and 3.7 ± 0.5 for FBP, AIDR3D, and FIRST, respectively.


      The FIRST method controls the increase in plaque density and the lumen–plaque contrast. Consequently, it improves the visualization of coronary plaques in coronary CT angiography.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Academic Radiology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Oncel D.
        • Oncel G.
        • Tastan A.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of coronary stent patency and in-stent restenosis with dual-source CT coronary angiography without heart rate control.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008; 191: 56-63
        • Mollet N.R.
        • Cademartiri F.
        • van Mieghem C.A.
        • et al.
        High-resolution spiral computed tomography coronary angiography in patients referred for diagnostic conventional coronary angiography.
        Circulation. 2005; 112: 2318-2323
        • Leschka S.
        • Alkadhi H.
        • Plass A.
        • et al.
        Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience.
        Eur Heart J. 2005; 26: 1482-1487
        • Miller J.M.
        • Rochitte C.E.
        • Dewey M.
        • et al.
        Diagnostic performance of coronary angiography by 64-row CT.
        N Engl J Med. 2008; 359: 2324-2336
        • Chen M.Y.
        • Shanbhag S.M.
        • Arai A.E.
        Submillisievert median radiation dose for coronary angiography with a second-generation 320-detector row CT scanner in 107 consecutive patients.
        Radiology. 2013; 267: 76-85
        • Cury R.C.
        • Abbara S.
        • Achenbach S.
        • et al.
        CAD-RADS(TM) Coronary Artery Disease—Reporting and Data System. An expert consensus document of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography (SCCT), the American College of Radiology (ACR) and the North American Society for Cardiovascular Imaging (NASCI). Endorsed by the American College of Cardiology.
        J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016; 10: 269-281
        • Utsunomiya D.
        • Fukunaga T.
        • Oda S.
        • et al.
        Multidetector computed tomography evaluation of coronary plaque morphology in patients with stable angina.
        Heart Vessels. 2011; 26: 392-398
        • Ferencik M.
        • Mayrhofer T.
        • Puchner S.B.
        • et al.
        Computed tomography-based high-risk coronary plaque score to predict acute coronary syndrome among patients with acute chest pain—results from the ROMICAT II trial.
        J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2015; 9: 538-545
        • Fuchs T.A.
        • Fiechter M.
        • Gebhard C.
        • et al.
        CT coronary angiography: impact of adapted statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR) on coronary stenosis and plaque composition analysis.
        Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013; 29: 719-724
        • Precht H.
        • Kitslaar P.H.
        • Broersen A.
        • et al.
        Influence of Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction on coronary plaque analysis in coronary computed tomography angiography.
        J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2016; 10: 507-516
        • Puchner S.B.
        • Ferencik M.
        • Karolyi M.
        • et al.
        The effect of iterative image reconstruction algorithms on the feasibility of automated plaque assessment in coronary CT angiography.
        Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013; 29: 1879-1888
        • Puchner S.B.
        • Ferencik M.
        • Maurovich-Horvat P.
        • et al.
        Iterative image reconstruction algorithms in coronary CT angiography improve the detection of lipid-core plaque—a comparison with histology.
        Eur Radiol. 2015; 25: 15-23
        • Dalager M.G.
        • Bottcher M.
        • Andersen G.
        • et al.
        Impact of luminal density on plaque classification by CT coronary angiography.
        Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011; 27: 593-600
        • Yoshioka K.
        • Tanaka R.
        • Muranaka K.
        • et al.
        Subtraction coronary CT angiography using second-generation 320-detector row CT.
        Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015; 31: 51-58
        • Kidoh M.
        • Utsunomiya D.
        • Oda S.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of the effect of intracoronary attenuation on coronary plaque measurements using a dual-phase coronary CT angiography technique on a 320-row CT scanner—in vivo validation study.
        Acad Radiol. 2016; 23: 315-320
        • Kidoh M.
        • Utsunomiya D.
        • Oda S.
        • et al.
        Optimized subtraction coronary CT angiography protocol for clinical use with short breath-holding time-initial experience.
        Acad Radiol. 2015; 22: 117-120
        • Nishiyama Y.
        • Tada K.
        • Nishiyama Y.
        • et al.
        Effect of the forward-projected model-based iterative reconstruction solution algorithm on image quality and radiation dose in pediatric cardiac computed tomography.
        Pediatr Radiol. 2016; 46: 1663-1670
        • Yasaka K.
        • Kamiya K.
        • Irie R.
        • et al.
        Metal artefact reduction for patients with metallic dental fillings in helical neck computed tomography: comparison of adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D (AIDR 3D), forward-projected model-based iterative reconstruction solution (FIRST) and AIDR 3D with single-energy metal artefact reduction (SEMAR).
        Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2016; 45: 20160114
        • Gervaise A.
        • Osemont B.
        • Lecocq S.
        • et al.
        CT image quality improvement using Adaptive Iterative Dose Reduction with wide-volume acquisition on 320-detector CT.
        Eur Radiol. 2012; 22: 295-301
        • Chen M.Y.
        • Steigner M.L.
        • Leung S.W.
        • et al.
        Simulated 50% radiation dose reduction in coronary CT angiography using adaptive iterative dose reduction in three-dimensions (AIDR3D).
        Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013; 29: 1167-1175
        • Einstein A.J.
        • Elliston C.D.
        • Arai A.E.
        • et al.
        Radiation dose from single-heartbeat coronary CT angiography performed with a 320-detector row volume scanner.
        Radiology. 2010; 254: 698-706
        • Nikolic B.
        • Khosa F.
        • Lin P.J.
        • et al.
        Absorbed radiation dose in radiosensitive organs during coronary CT angiography using 320-MDCT: effect of maximum tube voltage and heart rate variations.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010; 195: 1347-1354
        • Qin J.
        • Liu L.Y.
        • Fang Y.
        • et al.
        320-detector CT coronary angiography with prospective and retrospective electrocardiogram gating in a single heartbeat: comparison of image quality and radiation dose.
        Br J Radiol. 2012; 85: 945-951
        • Kitagawa K.
        • George R.T.
        • Arbab-Zadeh A.
        • et al.
        Characterization and correction of beam-hardening artifacts during dynamic volume CT assessment of myocardial perfusion.
        Radiology. 2010; 256: 111-118
        • Leipsic J.
        • Abbara S.
        • Achenbach S.
        • et al.
        SCCT guidelines for the interpretation and reporting of coronary CT angiography: a report of the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography Guidelines Committee.
        J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2014; 8: 342-358
        • Husarik D.B.
        • Marin D.
        • Samei E.
        • et al.
        Radiation dose reduction in abdominal computed tomography during the late hepatic arterial phase using a model-based iterative reconstruction algorithm: how low can we go?.
        Invest Radiol. 2012; 47: 468-474
        • Scheffel H.
        • Stolzmann P.
        • Schlett C.L.
        • et al.
        Coronary artery plaques: cardiac CT with model-based and adaptive-statistical iterative reconstruction technique.
        Eur J Radiol. 2012; 81: e363-e369
        • Funama Y.
        • Taguchi K.
        • Utsunomiya D.
        • et al.
        Image quality assessment of an iterative reconstruction algorithm applied to abdominal CT imaging.
        Phys Med. 2014; 30: 527-534
        • Leipsic J.
        • Labounty T.M.
        • Heilbron B.
        • et al.
        Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: assessment of image noise and image quality in coronary CT angiography.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010; 195: 649-654
        • Cademartiri F.
        • Mollet N.R.
        • Runza G.
        • et al.
        Influence of intracoronary attenuation on coronary plaque measurements using multislice computed tomography: observations in an ex vivo model of coronary computed tomography angiography.
        Eur Radiol. 2005; 15: 1426-1431
        • Hoffmann U.
        • Bamberg F.
        • Chae C.U.
        • et al.
        Coronary computed tomography angiography for early triage of patients with acute chest pain: the ROMICAT (Rule Out Myocardial Infarction using Computer Assisted Tomography) trial.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009; 53: 1642-1650
        • Yamamoto H.
        • Kitagawa T.
        • Ohashi N.
        • et al.
        Noncalcified atherosclerotic lesions with vulnerable characteristics detected by coronary CT angiography and future coronary events.
        J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2013; 7: 192-199