An Abbreviated Protocol for High-risk Screening Breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Impact on Performance Metrics and BI-RADS Assessment

      Rationale and Objectives

      Annual breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is recommended to screen high-risk populations for breast cancer, although costs are significant. This study assesses the performance of an abbreviated MRI protocol as a resource-efficient approach for screening patients at high-risk of breast cancer, and assesses whether the abbreviated protocol alters the assigned Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) category.

      Materials and Methods

      This is a prospective paired cohort study performed in an academic ambulatory setting. MRI images of women at high risk of breast cancer were reviewed using an abbreviated MRI protocol, followed by an immediate review of additional sequences included in a full diagnostic protocol. BI-RADS assessments, including all changes and interpretation times, were recorded for both the abbreviated and full protocol reviews. Cancer detection rate, positive predictive value 3 (PPV3), sensitivity, and specificity were calculated.


      A total of 1052 MRI cases were reviewed. The cancer detection rate was 13.3 per 1000 with a PPV3 of 30.4% based on the full protocol. Review of sequences included in the full protocol resulted in a change in the final BI-RADS assessments in 3.4% of the cases, the majority of which did not change clinical management with respect to biopsy. The sensitivity and specificity of the abbreviated and full protocols were not significantly different.


      This pilot study of an abbreviated MRI protocol demonstrates effective performance in cancer detection. BI-RADS assessments were rarely altered with the additional information afforded by the full protocol. The abbreviated protocol holds promise for resource-efficient breast cancer screening in high-risk women.

      Key Words

      Abbreviations and Acronyms:

      BI-RADS (Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System), CDR (cancer detection rate), MRI (magnetic resonance imaging), PPV3 (positive predictive value 3)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Academic Radiology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


        • Howlander N.
        • Noone A.
        • Krapcho M.
        • et al.
        SEER cancer statistics review, 1975–2012.
        National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD2015
        • American College of Radiology
        Appropriateness criteria.
        (Available at:) (Accessed June 18, 2016)
        • Kelly K.M.
        • Dean J.
        • Comulada W.S.
        • et al.
        Breast cancer detection using automated whole breast ultrasound and mammography in radiographically dense breasts.
        Eur Radiol. 2010; 20: 734-742
        • Berg W.A.
        • Blume J.D.
        • Cormack J.B.
        • et al.
        Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer.
        JAMA. 2008; 299: 2151-2163
        • Berg W.A.
        • Zhang Z.
        • Lehrer D.
        • et al.
        Detection of breast cancer with addition of annual screening ultrasound or a single screening MRI to mammography in women with elevated breast cancer risk.
        JAMA. 2012; 307: 1394-1404
        • O'Connor M.
        • Rhodes D.
        • Hruska C.
        Molecular breast imaging.
        Expert Rev Anticancer Ther. 2009; 9: 1073-1080
        • Rhodes D.J.
        • Hruska C.B.
        • Conners A.L.
        • et al.
        Journal club: molecular breast imaging at reduced radiation dose for supplemental screening in mammographically dense breasts.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015; 204: 241-251
        • Rhodes D.J.
        • Hruska C.B.
        • Phillips S.W.
        • et al.
        Dedicated dual-head gamma imaging for breast cancer screening in women with mammographically dense breasts.
        Radiology. 2011; 258: 106-118
        • Saslow D.
        • Boetes C.
        • Burke W.
        • et al.
        American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography.
        CA Cancer J Clin. 2007; 57: 75-89
        • Kuhl C.K.
        • Schrading S.
        • Strobel K.
        • et al.
        Abbreviated breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): first postcontrast subtracted images and maximum-intensity projection-a novel approach to breast cancer screening with MRI.
        J Clin Oncol. 2014; 32: 2304-2310
        • Grimm L.J.
        • Soo M.S.
        • Yoon S.
        • et al.
        Abbreviated screening protocol for breast MRI: a feasibility study.
        Acad Radiol. 2015; 22: 1157-1162
        • Mango V.L.
        • Morris E.A.
        • David Dershaw D.
        • et al.
        Abbreviated protocol for breast MRI: are multiple sequences needed for cancer detection?.
        Eur J Radiol. 2015; 84: 65-70
        • Harvey S.C.
        • Di Carlo P.A.
        • Lee B.
        • et al.
        An abbreviated protocol for high-risk screening breast MRI saves time and resources.
        J Am Coll Radiol. 2016; 4: 374-380
        • Niell B.L.
        • Gavenonis S.C.
        • Motazedi T.
        • et al.
        Auditing a breast MRI practice: performance measures for screening and diagnostic breast MRI.
        J Am Coll Radiol. 2014; 11: 883-889