Advertisement

Translating New Imaging Technologies to Clinical Practice

Published:August 23, 2017DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2017.03.027
      Radiology continues to benefit from constant innovation and technological advances. However, for promising new imaging technologies to reach widespread clinical practice, several milestones must be met. These include regulatory approval, early clinical evaluation, payer reimbursement, and broader marketplace adoption. Successful implementation of new imaging tests into clinical practice requires active stakeholder engagement and a focus on demonstrating clinical value during each phase of translation.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Academic Radiology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Reiner B.I.
        Optimizing technology development and adoption in medical imaging using the principles of innovation diffusion, part II: practical applications.
        J Digit Imaging. 2012; 25: 7-10
        • Kopans D.B.
        “Off label” use of FDA-approved devices and digital breast tomosynthesis.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015; 205: 1149-1151
        • U.S. Food and Drug Administration
        Overview of device regulation.
        (Available at)
        • Smith J.J.
        Regulation of medical devices in radiology: current standards and future opportunities.
        Radiology. 2001; 218: 329-335
        • Gunderman R.B.
        • Meesa I.R.
        The adoption of innovation.
        Radiology. 2008; 246: 659-661
        • Rogers E.M.
        Diffusion of innovations.
        5th ed. Free Press, New York, NY2003
        • Rafferty E.A.
        • Park J.M.
        • Philpotts L.E.
        • et al.
        Assessing radiologist performance using combined digital mammography and breast tomosynthesis compared with digital mammography alone: results of a multicenter, multireader trial.
        Radiology. 2013; 266: 104-113
        • Greenberg J.S.
        • Javitt M.C.
        • Katzen J.
        • et al.
        Clinical performance metrics of 3D digital breast tomosynthesis compared with 2D digital mammography for breast cancer screening in community practice.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014; 203: 687-693
        • Lee C.I.
        • Lehman C.D.
        Digital breast tomosynthesis and the challenges of implementing an emerging breast cancer screening technology into clinical practice.
        J Am Coll Radiol. 2013; 10: 913-917
        • Leslie-Mazwi T.M.
        • Bello J.A.
        • Tu R.
        • et al.
        Current procedural terminology: history, structure, and relationship to valuation for the neuroradiologist.
        AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2016; https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A4863
        • Thorwarth Jr, W.T.
        CPT: an open system that describes all that you do.
        J Am Coll Radiol. 2008; 5: 555-560
        • Thorwarth Jr, W.T.
        From concept to CPT code to compensation: how the payment system works.
        J Am Coll Radiol. 2004; 1: 48-53
        • Hirsch J.A.
        • Leslie-Mazwi T.M.
        • Nicola G.N.
        • et al.
        Current procedural terminology; a primer.
        J Neurointerv Surg. 2015; 7: 309-312
        • Cox K.
        • Duszak Jr, R.
        • Hemingway J.
        • et al.
        Reassessing Medicare trends in diagnostic CT colonography after achieving CPT code category I status.
        Abdom Radiol (NY). 2016; 41: 1357-1362
        • Duszak Jr, R.
        • Optican R.J.
        • Brin K.P.
        • et al.
        Cardiac CT and coronary CTA: early Medicare claims analysis of national and regional utilization and coverage.
        J Am Coll Radiol. 2011; 8: 549-555
        • Duszak Jr, R.
        • Kim D.H.
        • Pickhardt P.J.
        Expanding utilization and regional coverage of diagnostic CT colonography: early Medicare claims experience.
        J Am Coll Radiol. 2011; 8: 235-241
        • Hsiao W.C.
        • Braun P.
        • Dunn D.L.
        • et al.
        An overview of the development and refinement of the Resource-Based Relative Value Scale. The foundation for reform of U.S. physician payment.
        Med Care. 1992; 30: NS1-12
        • Hsiao W.C.
        • Braun P.
        • Dunn D.
        • et al.
        Resource-based relative values. An overview.
        JAMA. 1988; 260: 2347-2353
        • UCSF Medical Group
        RVU & RBRVS basics.
        (Available at)
        • American Medical Association
        RBRVS overview.
        (Available at)
        https://www.ama-assn.org/rbrvs-overview
        Date accessed: July 30, 2016
        • Otero H.J.
        • Chambers J.D.
        • Bresnahan B.W.
        • et al.
        Medicare's national coverage determinations in diagnostic radiology: examining evidence and setting limits.
        Acad Radiol. 2012; 19: 1060-1065
        • Social Security Administration
        Compilation of the social security laws.
        (Available at)
        http://www.ssa.gov/OP_Home/ssact/title18/1862.htm
        Date accessed: September 26, 2016
        • Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
        Revised process for making Medicare national coverage determinations.
        2003
        • Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
        Medicare coverage policy—MCAC charter.
        (Available at)
        http://www.cms.gov/mcac/default.asp
        Date accessed: September 28, 2016
        • Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services
        Guidance for the public, industry and CMS staff. Factors CMS considers in opening a national coverage determination 2006.
        (Available at)
        • Aberle D.R.
        • Adams A.M.
        • et al.
        • National Lung Screening Trial Research Team
        Reduced lung-cancer mortality with low-dose computed tomographic screening.
        N Engl J Med. 2011; 365: 395-409
        • Hardesty L.A.
        Issues to consider before implementing digital breast tomosynthesis into a breast imaging practice.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015; 204: 681-684
        • Houssami N.
        • Skaane P.
        Overview of the evidence on digital breast tomosynthesis in breast cancer detection.
        Breast. 2013; 22: 101-108
        • Lee C.I.
        • Bassett L.W.
        • Lehman C.D.
        Breast density legislation and opportunities for patient-centered outcomes research.
        Radiology. 2012; 264: 632-636
        • Lee C.I.
        • Jarvik J.G.
        Patient-centered outcomes research in radiology: trends in funding and methodology.
        Acad Radiol. 2014; 21: 1156-1161
        • Skaane P.
        • Bandos A.I.
        • Gullien R.
        • et al.
        Comparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program.
        Radiology. 2013; 267: 47-56
        • Ciatto S.
        • Houssami N.
        • Bernardi D.
        • et al.
        Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study.
        Lancet Oncol. 2013; 14: 583-589
        • Friedewald S.M.
        • Rafferty E.A.
        • Rose S.L.
        • et al.
        Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography.
        JAMA. 2014; 311: 2499-2507
        • Oeffinger K.C.
        • Fontham E.T.
        • Etzioni R.
        • et al.
        Breast cancer screening for women at average risk: 2015 guideline update from the American Cancer Society.
        JAMA. 2015; 314: 1599-1614
        • Siu A.L.
        • Force USPST
        Screening for breast cancer: U.S. preventive services task force recommendation statement.
        Ann Intern Med. 2016; 164: 279-296
        • Pandharipande P.V.
        • Gazelle G.S.
        Comparative effectiveness research: what it means for radiology.
        Radiology. 2009; 253: 600-605
        • Lee C.I.
        • Cevik M.
        • Alagoz O.
        • et al.
        Comparative effectiveness of combined digital mammography and tomosynthesis screening for women with dense breasts.
        Radiology. 2015; 274: 772-780
        • American College of Radiology
        ACR advocates for breast tomosynthesis coverage.
        (Available at)