Advertisement

Magic Angle in Cardiac CT

Eliminating Clinically Relevant Metal Artifacts in Pacemaker Leads with a Lead-Tip/Gantry Angle of ≤70°
Published:February 13, 2018DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2017.12.003

      Rationale and Objective

      To identify the influence of various parameters for reducing artifacts in computed tomography (CT) of commonly used pacemakers or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) lead tips.

      Materials and Methods

      This ex vivo phantom study compared two CT techniques (Dual-Energy CT [DECT] vs. Dual-Source CT [DSCT]), as well as the influence of incremental alterations of current-time product and pacemaker lead-tip angle with respect to the gantry plane. Four pacemaker leads and one ICD lead were evaluated. The images were assessed visually on a five-point Likert scale (1 = artifact free to 5 = massive artifacts). Likert values 1–3 represent clinically relevant, diagnostic image quality.

      Results

      344 of 400 total images were rated with diagnostic image quality. The DECT and dual-source DSCT technique each scored 86% diagnostic image quality. Statistically, DECT images showed significantly improved image quality (P < .05). Concerning the current-time product, no statistically significant change was found. Regarding lead-tip positioning, an angle of ≤70° yielded 100% diagnostic image quality. Pacemaker and ICD leads were assessed to have statistically significant differences.

      Conclusions

      Surprisingly, the lead-tip angle of 70° has been established as the key angle under which diagnostic image quality is always ensured, regardless of the imaging technique. Thus, we call 70° the “Magic angle” in CT pacemaker imaging.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Academic Radiology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Mond H.G.
        • Proclemer A.
        The 11th world survey of cardiac pacing and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: calendar year 2009—a World Society of Arrhythmia's project.
        Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2011; 34: 1013-1027
        • Ghani A.
        • Delnoy P.P.
        • Ramdat Misier A.R.
        • et al.
        Incidence of lead dislodgement, malfunction and perforation during the first year following device implantation.
        Neth Heart J. 2014; 22: 286-291
        • Achenbach S.
        • Barkhausen J.
        • Beer M.
        • et al.
        Konsensusempfehlungen der DRG / DGK / DGPK zum Einsatz der Herzbildgebung mit Computertomographie und Magnetresonanztomographie.
        Der Kardiologe. 2012; 2: 105-125
        • Lell M.
        • Marwan M.
        • Schepis T.
        • et al.
        Prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch spiral acquisition for coronary CT angiography using dual source CT: technique and initial experience.
        Eur Radiol. 2009; 19: 2576-2583
        • Guggenberger R.
        • Winklhofer S.
        • Osterhoff G.
        • et al.
        Metallic artefact reduction with monoenergetic dual-energy CT: systematic ex vivo evaluation of posterior spinal fusion implants from various vendors and different spine levels.
        Eur Radiol. 2012; 22: 2357-2364
        • Srinivasan A.
        • Hoeffner E.
        • Ibrahim M.
        • et al.
        Utility of dual-energy CT virtual keV monochromatic series for the assessment of spinal transpedicular hardware-bone interface.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2013; 201: 878-883
        • Yu L.
        • Leng S.
        • McCollough C.H.
        Dual-energy CT–based monochromatic imaging.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2012; 199: S9-S15
        • Kuchenbecker S.
        • Faby S.
        • Sawall S.
        • et al.
        Dual energy CT: how well can pseudo-monochromatic imaging reduce metal artifacts?.
        Med Phys. 2015; 42: 1023-1036
        • Takrouri H.S.
        • Alnassar M.M.
        • Amirabadi A.
        • et al.
        Metal artifact reduction: added value of rapid-kilovoltage-switching dual-energy CT in relation to single-energy CT in a piglet animal model.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015; 205: W352-W359
        • Bamberg F.
        • Dierks A.
        • Nikolaou K.
        • et al.
        Metal artifact reduction by dual energy computed tomography using monoenergetic extrapolation.
        Eur Radiol. 2011; 21: 1424-1429
        • Filograna L.
        • Magarelli N.
        • Leone A.
        • et al.
        Value of monoenergetic dual-energy CT (DECT) for artefact reduction from metallic orthopedic implants in post-mortem studies.
        Skeletal Radiol. 2015; 44: 1287-1294
        • Pessis E.
        • Campagna R.
        • Sverzut J.-M.
        • et al.
        Virtual monochromatic spectral imaging with fast kilovoltage switching: reduction of metal artifacts at CT.
        Radiographics. 2013; 33: 573-583
        • Roth T.D.
        • Maertz N.A.
        • Parr J.A.
        • et al.
        CT of the hip prosthesis: appearance of components, fixation, and complications.
        Radiographics. 2012; 32: 1089-1107
        • Boas F.E.
        • Fleischmann D.
        Evaluation of two iterative techniques for reducing metal artifacts in computed tomography.
        Radiology. 2011; 259
        • Lee M.-J.
        • Kim S.
        • Lee S.-A.
        • et al.
        Overcoming artifacts from metallic orthopedic implants at high-field-strength MR imaging and multidetector CT.
        Radiographics. 2007; 27: 791-803
        • Haramati N.
        • Staron R.B.
        • Mazel-Sperling K.
        • et al.
        CT scans through metal scanning technique versus hardware composition.
        Comput Med Imaging Graph. 1994; 18: 429-434
        • Barrett J.F.
        • Keat N.
        Artifacts in CT: recognition and avoidance.
        Radiographics. 2004; 24: 1679-1691
        • De Man B.
        • Nuyts J.
        • Dupont P.
        • et al.
        Metal streak artifacts in X-ray computed tomography: simulation study.
        IEEE Trans Nucl Sci. 1999; 46: 691-696
        • Mori I.
        • Machida Y.
        • Osanai M.
        • et al.
        Photon starvation artifacts of X-ray CT: their true cause and a solution.
        Radiol Phys Technol. 2013; 6: 130-141