Advertisement
Original Investigation| Volume 25, ISSUE 11, P1374-1380, November 2018

Gallbladder Scalloping, Mammillated Caudate Lobe, and Inferior Vena Cava Scalloping

Three Novel Ultrasound Signs of Cirrhosis
Published:March 27, 2018DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2018.02.011

      Purpose

      We aimed to present three new ultrasound signs—gallbladder scalloping, mammillated caudate lobe, and inferior vena cava scalloping—and determine their accuracy in diagnosing liver cirrhosis.

      Materials and Methods

      A total of 201 consecutive patients with a history of chronic liver disease who had undergone ultrasound imaging and liver biopsy were identified. A senior ultrasound radiologist blindly reviewed the ultrasound examinations. Specificity, sensitivity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of diagnosing cirrhosis were calculated for all evaluated ultrasound signs and selected combinations of signs, using the liver biopsy results as the reference standard.

      Results

      Of the 201 patients, 152 (76%) had either pathology-proven cirrhosis or significant fibrosis. Caudate lobe hypertrophy was the most specific (88%) and most positive predictor (90%) for cirrhosis, whereas mammillated caudate lobe was the most sensitive (78%). Inferior vena cava scalloping was the most specific (78%) of the three proposed ultrasound signs. When signs were combined, the presence of either gallbladder scalloping or liver surface nodularity was highly sensitive for cirrhosis (87%), whereas the presence of either gallbladder scalloping or inferior vena cava scalloping with caudate lobe hypertrophy was highly specific (93%).

      Conclusions

      Gallbladder scalloping, mammillated caudate lobe, and inferior vena cava scalloping are three novel signs that improve the accuracy of ultrasound in diagnosing cirrhosis.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Academic Radiology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Goyal N.
        • Jain N.
        • Rachapalli V.
        • et al.
        Non-invasive evaluation of liver cirrhosis using ultrasound.
        Clin Radiol. 2009; 64: 1056-1066
        • Irshad A.
        • Anis M.
        • Ackerman S.J.
        Current role of ultrasound in chronic liver disease: surveillance, diagnosis and management of hepatic neoplasms.
        Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2012; 41: 43-51
        • Afdhal N.H.
        • Nunes D.
        Evaluation of liver fibrosis: a concise review.
        Am J Gastroenterol. 2004; 99: 1160-1174
        • Manning D.S.
        • Afdhal N.H.
        Diagnosis and quantitation of fibrosis.
        Gastroenterology. 2008; 134: 1670-1681
        • Fontana R.J.
        • Lok A.S.
        Noninvasive monitoring of patients with chronic hepatitis C.
        Hepatology. 2002; 36: S57-S64
        • Martinez S.M.
        • Crespo G.
        • Navasa M.
        • et al.
        Noninvasive assessment of liver fibrosis.
        Hepatology. 2011; 53: 325-335
        • Castera L.
        Invasive and non-invasive methods for the assessment of fibrosis and disease progression in chronic liver disease.
        Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 2011; 25: 291-303
        • American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine
        Practice guideline for the performance of an ultrasound examination of the abdomen and/or retroperitoneum.
        (Available at)
        http://www.aium.org/resources/guidelines.aspx
        Date: 2002
        Date accessed: August 14, 2012
        • Brunt E.M.
        Grading and staging the histopathological lesions of chronic hepatitis: the Knodell histology activity index and beyond.
        Hepatology. 2000; 31: 241-246
        • Rumack C.M.
        • Wilson S.R.
        • Charboneau J.W.
        • et al.
        Diagnostic ultrasound.
        4th ed. Elsevier Mosby, St. Louis2011
        • Weinstein S.
        • Obuchowski N.A.
        • Lieber M.L.
        Clinical evaluation of diagnostic tests.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005; 184: 14-19
        • Harbin W.P.
        • Robert N.J.
        • Ferrucci Jr, J.T.
        Diagnosis of cirrhosis based on regional changes in hepatic morphology: a radiological and pathological analysis.
        Radiology. 1980; 135: 273-283
        • Colli A.
        • Fraquelli M.
        • Andreoletti M.
        • et al.
        Severe liver fibrosis or cirrhosis: accuracy of US for detection—analysis of 300 cases.
        Radiology. 2003; 227: 89-94
        • Giorgio A.
        • Amoroso P.
        • Lettieri G.
        • et al.
        Cirrhosis: value of caudate to right lobe ratio in diagnosis with US.
        Radiology. 1986; 161: 443-445
        • Gaiani S.
        • Gramantieri L.
        • Venturoli N.
        • et al.
        What is the criterion for differentiating chronic hepatitis from compensated cirrhosis? A prospective study comparing ultrasonography and percutaneous liver biopsy.
        J Hepatol. 1997; 27: 979-985
        • Filly R.A.
        • Reddy S.G.
        • Nalbandian A.B.
        • et al.
        Sonographic evaluation of liver nodularity: inspection of deep versus superficial surfaces of the liver.
        J Clin Ultrasound. 2002; 30: 399-407
        • Di Lelio A.
        • Cestari C.
        • Lomazzi A.
        • et al.
        Cirrhosis: diagnosis with sonographic study of the liver surface.
        Radiology. 1989; 172: 389-392
        • Kitamura H.
        • Kobayashi C.
        Impairment of change in diameter of the hepatic portion of the inferior vena cava: a sonographic sign of liver fibrosis or cirrhosis.
        J Ultrasound Med. 2005; 24 (quiz 360-351): 355-359
        • Khan M.H.
        • Farrell G.C.
        • Byth K.
        • et al.
        Which patients with hepatitis C develop liver complications?.
        Hepatology. 2000; 31: 513-520
        • Poynard T.
        • Bedossa P.
        • Opolon P.
        Natural history of liver fibrosis progression in patients with chronic hepatitis C. The OBSVIRC, METAVIR, CLINIVIR, and DOSVIRC groups.
        Lancet. 1997; 349: 825-832