Efficacy of 3D Printed Models on Resident Learning and Understanding of Common Acetabular Fracturers

      Rationale and Objectives

      The conceptualization of acetabular fractures can present a daunting challenge to radiology residents. 3D models have been shown to aid in the spatial perception of complicated anatomy and may help residents grasp the elaborate classification systems for these anatomically complex fractures. Prior studies have explored the utility of 3D printed models for surgical planning in various settings. To our knowledge, no study has evaluated their efficacy in radiology resident training.

      Materials and Methods

      Following IRB approval, 22 radiology residents were randomized and stratified by Post Graduate Year into two groups of 11 residents. Both groups received separate identical presentations on the 5 most common acetabular fractures given by a musculoskeletal trained radiologist. Residents in the experimental group received 3D printed models of the five most common fracture types with which to interact during the presentation, while the control group did not. Both groups received a pretest and a follow up posttest three weeks later.

      Results

      A Wilcoxon rank sum test was performed to determine if statistically significant differences between the pretest and posttest scores of the experimental and control groups existed. There was no statistically significant difference in scores on the pre-test, which confirmed successful randomization. There was a statistically significant difference (P = 0.02) on the posttest scores between the experimental and control groups.

      Conclusion

      3D printed models promise as an effective educational tool for resident learning with respect to acetabular fractures, improving short-term understanding of complex anatomy and classification systems.

      Key Words

      Abbreviations:

      3D (three dimensional), IRB (Institutional Review Board), MSK (musculoskeletal), PGY (Post Graduate Year), CD (compact disk)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Academic Radiology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Manganaro MS
        • Morag Y
        • Weadock WJ
        • et al.
        Creating three-dimensional printed models of acetabular fractures for use as educational tools.
        RadioGraphics. 2017; 37: 871-880
        • Matsumoto JS
        • Morris JM
        • Foley TA
        • et al.
        Three-dimensional physical modeling: applications and experience at Mayo Clinic.
        RadioGraphics. 2015; 35: 1989-2006
        • McMenamin PG
        • Quayle MR
        • McHenry CR
        • et al.
        The production of anatomical teaching resources using three-dimensional (3D) printing technology.
        Anat Sci Educ. 2014; 7: 479-486
        • Bagaria V
        • Chaudhary K
        A paradigm shift in surgical planning and simulation using 3Dgraphy: experience of first 50 surgeries done using 3D-printed biomodels.
        Injury. 2017; 48: 2501-2508
        • Liu ZJ
        • Jia J
        • Zhang YG
        • et al.
        Internal fixation of complicated acetabular fractures directed by preoperative surgery with 3D printed models.
        Orthop Surg. 2017; 9: 257-260
        • Chen X
        • Chen X
        • Zhang G
        • et al.
        Accurate fixation of plates and screws for the treatment of acetabular fractures using 3D-printed guiding templates: an experimental study.
        Injury. 2017; 48: 1147-1154
        • Wang H
        • Wang F
        • Newman S
        • et al.
        Application of an innovative computerized virtual planning system in acetabular fracture surgery: a feasibility study.
        Injury. 2016; 47: 1698-1701
        • Hassinger JP
        • Dozois EJ
        • Holubar EJ
        • et al.
        Virtual pelvic anatomy simulator: a pilot study of usability and perceived effectiveness.
        J Surg Res. 2010; 161: 23-27
        • Potok PS
        • Hopper KD
        • Umlauf MJ
        Fractures of the acetabulum: imaging, classification, and understanding.
        RadioGraphics. 1995; 15: 7-23
        • Goulet JA
        • Bray TJ
        Complex acetabular fractures.
        Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1989; 240: 9-20
        • Brandser E
        • Marsh JL
        Acetabular fractures: easier classification with a systematic approach.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1998; 171: 1217-1228
        • Letournel E
        • Judet R
        Fractures of the acetabulum.
        2nd ed. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany1993
        • Hunter JC
        • Brandser EA
        • Tran KA
        Pelvic and acetabular trauma.
        Radiol Clin North Am. 1997; 35: 559-590
      1. Huang Z, Song W, Zhang Y, et al. Three-dimensional printing model improves morphological understanding in acetabular fracture learning: aA multicenter, randomized, controlled study. PLoS One 2018: 13: e0191328.

        • Kim JW
        • Lee Y
        • Seo J
        • et al.
        Clinical experience with three-dimensional printing techniques in orthopedic trauma.
        J Orthop Sci. 2018; 23: 383-388
        • Venail F
        • Deveze A
        • Lallemant B
        • et al.
        Enhancement of temporal bone anatomy learning with computer 3D rendered imaging software.
        Med Teach. 2010; 32: e282-e288