Advertisement

A Program Director's Guide to Cultivating Diversity and Inclusion in Radiology Residency Recruitment

Published:August 28, 2019DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2019.07.027
      Diversity and inclusion are vital elements to the success of any group. Indeed, evidence from the business world indicates that a group's overall talent level is a function of its collective cognitive diversity. The ability to effectively problem solve, innovate, and adapt to change all depend to a large degree on the biases and life experiences of an organization's constituent members. As other industries have come to embrace this principle, their recruitment strategies have included placing a premium on employees who can think differently from one another.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Academic Radiology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      REFERENCES

        • Nivet M.A.
        Commentary: diversity 3.0: a necessary systems upgrade.
        Acad Med. 2011; 86: 1487-1489
        • Chapman C.H.
        • Hwang W.T.
        • Both S.
        • et al.
        Current status of diversity by race, hispanic ethnicity, and sex in diagnostic radiology.
        Radiology. 2014; 270: 232-240
        • Lightfoote J.B.
        • Deville C.
        • Ma L.D.
        • et al.
        Diversity, inclusion, and representation: it is time to act.
        J Am Coll Radiol. 2016; 13: 1421-1425
        • Advancing Holistic Review Initiative Advisory Committee, Association of American Medical College
        Advancing holistic review initiative.
        Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, DC2014
        • Conrad S.S.
        • Addams A.N.
        • Young G.H.
        Holistic review in medical school admissions and selection: a strategic, mission-driven response to shifting societal needs.
        Acad Med. 2016; 91: 1472-1474
        • Maxfield C.M.
        • Thorpe M.P.
        • Desser T.S.
        • et al.
        Bias in radiology resident selection: do we discriminate against the obese and unattractive?.
        Acad Med. 2019;
        • Witzburg R.A.
        • Sondheimer H.M.
        Holistic review—shaping the medical profession one applicant at a time.
        N Engl J Med. 2013; 368: 1565-1567
        • Katsufrakis P.J.
        • Uhler T.A.
        • Jones L.E.
        The residency application process: pursuing improved outcomes through better understanding of the issues.
        Acad Med. 2016; 91: 1483-1487
        • Carmody J.B.
        • Sarkany D.
        • Heitkamp D.E.
        The USMLE step 1 pass/fail reporting proposal: another view.
        Acad Radiol. 2019; (pii: S1076-6332(19)30296-X. [Epub ahead of print])https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2019.06.002
        • Kagetsu N.J.
        • Gunderman R.B.
        Unconscious bias.
        J Am Coll Radiol. 2017; 14: 1253-1255
        • Ross H.J.
        3 ways to make less biased decisions.
        Harvard Bus Rev. 2015;
        • Altmaier E.M.
        • Smith W.L.
        • O'Halloran C.M.
        • et al.
        The predictive utility of behavior-based interviewing compared to traditional interviewing in the selection of radiology residents.
        Invest Radiol. 1992; 27: 385-389
      1. Best practices for conducting residency program interviews.
        Association of American Medical Colleges, Washington, DC2016
        • Auseon A.J.
        • Kolibash A.J.
        • Capers Q.
        Successful efforts to increase diversity in a cardiology fellowship training program.
        J Grad Med Educ. 2013; 5: 481-485