Advertisement

Gail Model Improves the Diagnostic Performance of the Fifth Edition of Ultrasound BI-RADS for Predicting Breast Cancer: A Multicenter Prospective Study

Published:December 28, 2020DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2020.12.002

      Rationale and Objectives

      The sonographic appearance of benign and malignant breast nodules overlaps to some extent, and we aimed to assess the performance of the Gail model as an adjunctive tool to ultrasound (US) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) for predicting the malignancy of nodules.

      Materials and Methods

      From 2018 to 2019, 2607 patients were prospectively enrolled by 35 health care facilities. An individual breast cancer risk was assessed by the Gail model. Based on B-mode US, color Doppler, and elastography, all nodules were evaluated according to the fifth edition of BI-RADS, and these nodules were all confirmed later by pathology.

      Results

      We demonstrated that the Gail model, age, tumor size, tumor shape, growth orientation, margin, contour, acoustic shadowing, microcalcification, presence of duct ectasia, presence of architectural distortion, color Doppler flow, BI-RADS, and elastography score were significantly related to breast cancer (all p < 0.001). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, accuracy, and area under the curve (AUC) for combining the Gail model with the BI-RADS category were 95.6%, 91.3%, 85.0%, 97.6%, 92.8%, and 0.98, respectively. Combining the Gail model with the BI-RADS showed better diagnostic efficiency than the BI-RADS and Gail model alone (AUC 0.98 vs 0.80, p < 0.001; AUC 0.98 vs 0.55, p < 0.001) and demonstrated a higher specificity than the BI-RADS (91.3% vs 59.4%, p < 0.001).

      Conclusion

      The Gail model could be used to differentiate malignant and benign breast lesions. Combined with the BI-RADS category, the Gail model was adjunctive to US for predicting breast lesions for malignancy. For the diagnosis of malignancy, more attention should be paid to high-risk patients with breast lesions.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Academic Radiology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Fan L
        • Strasser-Weippl K
        • Li JJ
        • et al.
        Breast cancer in China.
        Lancet Oncol. 2014; 15: e279-e289
        • Rajaram N
        • Mariapun S
        • Eriksson M
        • et al.
        Differences in mammographic density between Asian and Caucasian populations: a comparative analysis.
        Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017; 161: 353-362
        • Burkett BJ
        • Hanemann CW.
        A review of supplemental screening ultrasound for breast cancer: certain populations of women with dense breast tissue may benefit.
        Acad Radiol. 2016; 23: 1604-1609
        • Shen S
        • Zhou Y
        • Xu Y
        • et al.
        A multi-centre randomised trial comparing ultrasound vs mammography for screening breast cancer in high-risk Chinese women.
        Br J Cancer. 2015; 112: 998-1004
        • Ontario Health Quality
        Ultrasound as an adjunct to mammography for breast cancer screening: a health technology assessment.
        Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2016; 16: 1-71
        • Guo R
        • Lu G
        • Qin B
        • et al.
        Ultrasound imaging technologies for breast cancer detection and management: a review.
        Ultrasound Med Biol. 2018; 44: 37-70
        • Guo Q
        • Zhang L
        • Di Z
        • Ning C
        • et al.
        Assessing Risk Category of Breast Cancer by Ultrasound Imaging Characteristics.
        Ultrasound Med Biol. 2018; 44: 815-824
        • American College of Radiology
        Breast imaging reporting and data system. Breast imaging atlas.
        5th edition. Author, Reston, VA2013
        • Kim JY
        • Jung EJ
        • Park T
        • et al.
        Prognostic importance of ultrasound BI-RADS classification in breast cancer patients.
        Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2015; 45: 411-415
        • Stavros AT
        • Freitas AG
        • deMello GGN
        • et al.
        Ultrasound positive predictive values by BI-RADS categories 3-5 for solid masses: An independent reader study.
        Eur Radiol. 2017; 27: 4307-4315
        • Gail MH
        • Brinton LA
        • Byar DP
        • et al.
        Projecting individualized probabilities of developing breast cancer for white females who are being examined annually.
        J Natl Cancer Inst. 1989; 81: 1879-1886
      1. National Cancer Institute: Breast cancer risk assessment tool. Availble at: http://www.cancer.gov/bcrisktool/Default.aspx. [Accessed October 1, 2019]

        • Adler DD
        • Carson PL
        • Rubin JM
        • et al.
        Doppler ultrasound color flow imaging in the study of breast cancer: preliminary findings.
        Ultrasound Med Biol. 1990; 16: 553-559
        • Weik JL
        • Lum SS
        • Esquivel PA
        • et al.
        The Gail model predicts breast cancer in women with suspicious radiographic lesions.
        Am J Surg. 2005; 190: 526-529
        • Rockhill B
        • Spiegelman D
        • Byrne C
        • et al.
        Validation of the Gail et al. model of breast cancer risk prediction and implications for chemoprevention.
        J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001; 93: 358-366
        • Gail MH
        • Costantino JP.
        Validating and improving models for projecting the absolute risk of breast cancer.
        J Natl Cancer Inst. 2001; 93: 334e5
        • Barr RG.
        Breast elastography: how to perform and integrate into a "best-practice" patient treatment algorithm.
        J Ultrasound Med. 2020; 39: 7-17
        • Carlsen JF
        • Ewertsen C
        • Lönn L
        • Nielsen MB
        Strain elastography ultrasound: an overview with emphasis on breast cancer diagnosis.
        Diagnostics (Basel). 2013; 3: 117-125
        • Zhi H
        • Xiao XY
        • Ou B
        • et al.
        Could ultrasonic elastography help the diagnosis of small (≤2 cm) breast cancer with the usage of sonographic BI-RADS classification?.
        Eur J Radiol. 2012; 81: 3216-3221
        • Lee JH
        • Kim SH
        • Kang BJ
        • et al.
        Role and clinical usefulness of elastography in small breast masses.
        Acad Radiol. 2011; 18: 74-80