Advertisement

Evaluation of the Effect of Age, Menopausal Status, and Parity on Breast Parenchyma Stiffness by Multiparametric Shear Wave Elastography

Published:October 23, 2021DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2021.09.021

      HIGHLIGHTS

      • There is a direct relationship between age, menopausal status, parity, mammographic breast density with elastographic breast stiffness.
      • All mpSWE values were found to be higher in nulliparous and post-menopausal women than premenopausal patients with prior parity.
      • The elastographic breast stiffness in type C and D breast density by mamography is higher than type A and B breast density.

      Rationale and Objectives

      To evaluate the relationship between quantitative breast parenchyma stiffness by using multiparametric shear wave elastography (mpSWE) and the potential risk factors of breast cancer.

      Material and methods

      The Vmean, Vmax, Vmin, Vsd values were measured with mpSWE from each breast and each quadrant in all cases under and over the age of 40. Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate the relationship between breast stiffness and age, side, quadrant, menopausal status, mammographic breast density, and obstetric history.

      Results

      The study cohort included 964 breasts of 482 patients, where 342 patients were ≥40 years of age; and 140 cases were <40 years of age with a mean age of 45.07 ± 10.96. No significant difference in breast stiffness was detected between right and left breasts (p > 0.05); however, upper quadrants were found to be stiffer than the lower quadrants (p < 0.05). The effect of age on all values was found to be significant (p < 0.05), and stiffness increased with age. All mpSWE values of post-menopausal cases were significantly higher (p < 0.05) than premenopausal cases. Nulliparous cases had higher values than cases with prior parity (p < 0.05). Cases with Type C and D breast density had higher stiffness values than those with Type A and Type B breast density.

      Conclusion

      Breast parenchyma shows increased stiffness in in post-menopausal, nulliparous and older patients and patients with dense breast density. Similar to the mammographic increased breast density, elastographically increased breast parenchymal stiffness may be used as a possible risk factor for breast cancer or as a predictor of breast cancer.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Academic Radiology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      REFERENCES

        • Sancho-Garnier H
        • Colonna M
        Épidémiologie des cancers du sein [Breast cancer epidemiology].
        Presse Med. 2019; 48: 1076-1084https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lpm.2019.09.022
        • Ghoncheh M
        • Pournamdar Z
        • Salehiniya H
        Incidence and mortality and epidemiology of breast cancer in the world.
        Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2016; 17: 43-46https://doi.org/10.7314/apjcp.2016.17.s3.43
        • Surakasula A
        • Nagarjunapu GC
        • Raghavaiah KV
        A comparative study of pre- and post-menopausal breast cancer: risk factors, presentation, characteristics and management.
        J Res Pharm Pract. 2014; 3: 12-18https://doi.org/10.4103/2279-042X.132704
        • Chamming's F
        • Hangard C
        • Gennisson JL
        • et al.
        Diagnostic accuracy of four levels of manual compression applied in supersonic shear wave elastography of the breast.
        Acad Radiol. 2021; 28: 481-486https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2020.03.012
        • Makal GB
        • Güvenç İ
        The role of shear wave elastography in differentiating idiopathic granulomatous mastitis from breast cancer.
        Acad Radiol. 2021; 28: 339-344https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2020.02.008
      1. Fenner J, Stacer AC, Winterroth F, et al. Macroscopic stiffness of breast tumors predicts metastasis. Sci Rep. 2014;4:5512. https://doi:10.1038/srep05512.

        • Northey JJ
        • Barrett AS
        • Acerbi I
        • et al.
        Stiff stroma increases breast cancer risk by inducing the oncogene ZNF217.
        J Clin Invest. 2020; 130: 5721-5737https://doi.org/10.1172/JCI129249
        • Boyd NF
        • Li Q
        • Melnichouk O
        • et al.
        Evidence that breast tissue stiffness is associated with risk of breast cancer.
        PLoS One. 2014; 9e100937https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0100937
        • Nelson CM
        • Bissell MJ
        Of extracellular matrix, scaffolds, and signaling: tissue architecture regulates development, homeostasis, and cancer.
        Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2006; 22: 287-309
        • Levental K.
        • et al.
        Matrix crosslinking forces tumor progression by enhancing integrin signaling.
        Cell. 2009; 139: 891-906
      2. Collaborative group on hormonal factors in breast cancer. Menarche, menopause, and breast cancer risk: individual participant meta-analysis, including 118 964 women with breast cancer from 117 epidemiological studies.
        Lancet Oncol. 2012; 13: 1141-1151https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(12)70425-4
        • Slepicka PF
        • Cyrill SL
        • Dos Santos CO
        Pregnancy and breast cancer: pathways to understand risk and prevention.
        Trends Mol Med. 2019; 25: 866-881https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molmed.2019.06.003
        • Davis JD
        • Lin SY
        DNA damage and breast cancer.
        World J Clin Oncol. 2011; 2: 329-338https://doi.org/10.5306/wjco.v2.i9.329
        • Slocum E
        • Craig A
        • Villanueva A
        • et al.
        Parity predisposes breasts to the oncogenic action of PAPP-A and activation of the collagen receptor DDR2.
        Breast Cancer Res. 2019; 21: 56https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-019-1142-z
        • Barker HE
        • Chang J
        • Cox TR
        • et al.
        LOXL2-mediated matrix remodeling in metastasis and mammary gland involution.
        Cancer Res. 2011; 71: 1561-1572
        • Sherratt MJ
        • McConnell JC
        • Streuli CH
        Raised mammographic density: causative mechanisms and biological consequences.
        Breast Cancer Res. 2016; 18: 45https://doi.org/10.1186/s13058-016-0701-9
      3. Dzoic Dominkovic M, Ivanac G, Bojanic K, et al. Exploring association of breast pain, pregnancy, and body mass index with breast tissue elasticity in healthy women: glandular and fat differences. Diagnostics (Basel). 2020;10(6):393. https://doi:10.3390/diagnostics10060393.

        • Rzymski P
        • Skórzewska A
        • Skibińska-Zielińska M
        • et al.
        Factors influencing breast elasticity measured by the ultrasound shear wave elastography - preliminary results.
        Arch Med Sci. 2011; 7: 127-133https://doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2011.20617
        • Boyd 2 NF
        • Martin LJ
        • Bronskill MJ
        • et al.
        Breast tissue composition and susceptibility to breast cancer.
        J Natl Cancer Inst. 2010; 102: 1224-1237
        • McCormack VA
        • dos Santos Silva I
        Breast density and parenchymal patterns as markers of breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis.
        Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006; 15: 1159-1169
        • Huo CW
        • Chew G
        • Hill P
        • et al.
        High mammographic density is associated with an increase in stromal collagen and immune cells within the mammary epithelium.
        Breast Cancer Res. 2015; 17: 79
        • Guo YP
        • Martin LJ
        • Hanna W
        • et al.
        Growth factors and stromal matrix proteins associated with mammographic densities.
        Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2001; 10: 243-248
        • D'Orsi C
        • Sickles EA
        • Mendelson EB
        • et al.
        Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System: ACR BI-RADS breast imaging atlas.
        5th ed. Va: American College of Radiology, Reston2013
        • Wengert GJ
        • Helbich TH
        • Leithner D
        • et al.
        Multimodality imaging of breast parenchymal density and correlation with risk assessment.
        Curr Breast Cancer Rep. 2019; 11: 23-33
        • Džoić Dominković M
        • Ivanac G
        • Brkljačić B
        Comparison of sonoelastographic values of breast tissue with mammographically and ultrasonically assessed density: a cross-sectional study.
        Croat Med J. 2020; 61: 223-229https://doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2020.61.223
        • Chen JH
        • Lee YW
        • Chan SW
        • et al.
        Breast density analysis with automated whole-breast ultrasound: comparison with 3-d magnetic resonance imaging.
        Ultrasound Med Biol. 2016; 42: 1211-1220https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2015.12.015
        • Woolcott CG
        • Koga K
        • Conroy SM
        • et al.
        Mammographic density, parity and age at first birth, and risk of breast cancer: an analysis of four case-control studies.
        Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012; 132: 1163-1171https://doi.org/10.1007/s10549-011-1929-9
        • Tulinius H
        • Sigvaldason H
        • Olafsdóttir G
        Left and right sided breast cancer.
        Pathol Res Pract. 1990; 186: 92-94https://doi.org/10.1016/S0344-0338(11)81015-0
        • Fatima N
        • Zaman MU
        • Maqbool A
        • et al.
        Lower incidence but more aggressive behavior of right sided breast cancer in Pakistani women: does right deserve more respect?.
        Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013; 14: 43-45https://doi.org/10.7314/apjcp.2013.14.1.43
        • Chan S
        • Chen JH
        • Li S
        • et al.
        Evaluation of the association between quantitative mammographic density and breast cancer occurred in different quadrants.
        BMC Cancer. 2017; 17: 274https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-017-3270-0
        • Lee AH
        Why is carcinoma of the breast more frequent in the upper outer quadrant? A case series based on needle core biopsy diagnoses.
        Breast. 2005; 14: 151-152https://doi.org/10.1016/j.breast.2004.07.002