Advertisement

The ADVICER Template for Faculty Reviewer Letters for Promotion and Appointment

Published:January 27, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2021.12.027

      Rationale and Objectives

      Promotion is an important milestone in the career of academic radiologists. Appointments, Promotion and Tenure (APT) committees require multiple letters of support from both internal and external referees. Traditional narrative letters are highly subjective, have high inter-reader variability, are time-intensive, and vulnerable to gender and other biases. The Alliance of Directors and Vice Chairs of Education in Radiology (ADVICER) recognized the need for a standardized template to assist academic faculty, letter writers, and APT committees.

      Materials and Methods

      An ADVICER ad hoc committee of six educators with experience serving as external referees was convened to create a standardized template. Committee members performed a search of the relevant literature and internet sites, spoke with stakeholders such as APT chairs, and ultimately developed a template for faculty reviewer letters using the common clinician-educator pathway as a focal point.

      Results

      An open source, modifiable, standardized, template was produced. The template has been made available to ADVICER members and is available on the Association of University Radiologists (AUR) website at: https://www.aur.org/resources/Template-for-Faculty-Reviewer-Letters-for-Promotion-and-Appointment

      Conclusion

      This external referee template has the potential to reduce subjectivity, eliminate bias, and provide a flexible, modifiable, comprehensive faculty review letter template which will be useful for academic faculty, letter writers, and promotions committees.

      Key Words

      Abbreviations:

      APT (Aointments Promotion and Tenure), ADVICER (Alliance of Directors and Vice Chairs of Education in Radiology), AUR (Association of University Radiologists), CV (curriculum vitae), SLOR (standardized letter of recommendation)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Academic Radiology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      REFERENCES

        • Jhala K
        • Kim J
        • Chetlen A
        • Nickerson JP
        • Lewis PJ
        The clinician-educator pathway in radiology: an analysis of institutional promotion criteria.
        J Am Coll Radiol. 2017; 14: 1588-1593
        • DeZee KJ
        • Thomas MR
        • Mintz M
        • Durning SJ
        Letters of recommendation: rating, writing, and reading by clerkship directors of internal medicine.
        Teach Learn Med. 2009; 21: 153-158
        • Kimple AJ
        • McClurg SW
        • Del Signore AG
        • Tomoum MO
        • Lin F-C
        • Senior BA
        Standardized letters of recommendation and successful match into otolaryngology.
        Laryngoscope. 2016; 126: 1071-1076
        • Dunnick NR
        Letters of recommendation for promotion.
        Acad Radiol. 2021; 29: 1-3
        • Sox HC
        • Schuster MA
        Criteria for academic promotion in medicine.
        BMJ. 2020; 369: 1-2
        • Shah S
        • Brumberg HL
        • Kuo A
        • Balasubramaniam V
        • Wong S
        • Opipari V
        Academic advocacy and promotion: how to climb a ladder not yet built.
        J Pediatr. 2019; 213: 4-7
        • Levine M
        Primer for clinician scholars in academic radiology.
        Radiology. 2014; 231: 622-627
        • Rushing GD
        • Mokadam NA
        Faculty development: using education for career advancement.
        Thorac Surg Clin. 2019; 29: 321-328
        • Buchanan GR
        Academic promotion and tenure: a user’s guide for junior faculty members.
        Hematology. 2009; : 736-741
        • Heflin MT
        • Pinheiro S
        • Kaminetzky CP
        • et al.
        ‘So you want to be a clinician-educator.’’: designing a clinician-educator curriculum for internal medicine residents.
        Med Teach. 2009; 31: e233-e240.10
        • Jibson MD
        • Hilty DM
        • Arlinghaus K
        • et al.
        Clinician-educator tracks for residents: three pilot programs.
        Acad Psychiatry. 2010; 34: 269-276.11
        • Naeger DM
        • Phelps A
        • Shah V
        • et al.
        Clinician-educator pathway for radiology residents.
        Acad Radiol. 2011; 18: 640-644
        • Chapman T
        • Carrico C
        • Vagal AS
        • Paladin AM
        Promotion as a clinician educator in academic radiology departments: guidelines at three major institutions.
        Acad Radiol. 2012; 19: 119-124
        • Colletti PM
        Promotion for the academic radiologist.
        Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2015; 44: 229-231
        • Garmel GM
        • Grover CA
        • Quinn A
        • et al.
        Medical student forum: letters of recommendation.
        J EmergMed. 2019; 57: 405-410
        • Young VVN
        Letters of recommendation: association with interviewers’ perceptions and preferences.
        Otolaryngol—Head Neck Surg. 2017; 156: 1108-1113
        • Grabowski G
        • Walker JW
        Orthopaedic fellowship selection criteria: a survey of fellowship directors.
        J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013; 95: 154-159
        • Letter Balon R
        What about letters in support of academic promotion?.
        Acad Psychiatry. 2013; 37: 142-143
        • MacLean LM
        • Alexander G
        • Oja-Tebbe N
        Letters of recommendation in residency training: what do they really mean?.
        Acad Psychiatry. 2011; 35: 342-343
        • Tang AL
        • Howard JJM
        • Singh E
        • et al.
        Are standardized letters of recommendation in residency applications correlated with objective data?.
        J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2019; 6: 1-6
        • Kominsky AH
        • Bryson PC
        • Benninger MS
        • Tierney WS
        Variability of ratings in the otolaryngology standardized letter of recommendation.
        Otolaryngol—Head Neck Surg. 2016; 154: 287-293
        • Keim SM
        • Rein JA
        • Chisholm C
        • et al.
        A standardized letter of recommendation for residency application.
        Acad Emerg Mede: Offic J Soc Acad Emerg Med. 1999; 6: 1141-1146
      1. Standardized letter of recommendation.” Association of University Radiologists. Available at: www.aur.org/en/resources/standardized-letter-recommendation. Accessed 11/21/22

        • Perkins JN
        • Liang C
        • McFann K
        • Abaza MM
        • Streubel SO
        • Prager JD
        Standardized letter of recommendation for otolaryngology residency selection.
        Laryngoscope. 2013; 123: 123-133
        • Girzadas DV
        • Harwood RC
        • Dearie J
        • Garrett S
        A comparison of standardized and narrative letters of recommendation.
        Acad Emerg Med. 1998; 5: 1101-1114
        • Prager JD
        • Perkins JN
        • McFann K
        • Myer CM
        • Pensak ML
        • Chan KH
        Standardized letter of recommendation for pediatric fellowship selection.
        Laryngoscope. 2011; 122: 415-424
        • Feder ME
        • Madara JL
        Evidence-based appointment and promotion of academic faculty at the university of chicago.
        Acad Med. 2008; 83: 85-95
        • Larkin GL
        • Marco CA
        Ethics seminars: beyond authorship requirements: ethical considerations in writing letters of recommendation.
        Acad Emerg Med. 2001; 8: 70-73