Advertisement

Views of Diagnostic Radiology Residency Program Directors Regarding Methods to Increase Female and Under-Represented in Medicine Residents: A Cross-sectional Study

      Rationale and Objectives

      Diagnostic radiology remains one of the least diverse medical specialties. Recent reports have found that the number of female and under-represented in medicine (URiM) residents have not increased despite efforts to increase representation over the last decade. Given the critical role of residency program directors in selecting diverse applicants, this study was performed to identify which strategies were most preferred to increase the number of female and/or URiM residents by directors of diagnostic radiology residency training programs.

      Materials and Methods

      This was an anonymous, cross-sectional study of diagnostic radiology residency program directors that included a survey about program characteristics, demographics, and strategies to increase the number of female and/or URiM residents.

      Results

      The questionnaire was submitted to 181 potential participants with a 19.9% response rate. The most preferred strategies to increase diversity involved directly recruiting medical students, promoting mentorship, increasing the number of diverse teaching faculty, and unconscious bias training. The least supported strategies included deemphasizing exam scores, accepting more international graduates, accepting a minimum number of female and/or URiM applicants, and de-identifying applications. Female and/or URiM program directors indicated a statistically significant preference for medical student recruitment and providing an opportunity to discuss workplace issues for female and/or URiM trainees (p < 0.05).

      Conclusion

      Diagnostic radiology residency program directors endorsed a wide variety of strategies to increase diversity. Recruitment of female and/or URiM medical students and promoting the number of diverse faculty members and mentorship of trainees by these faculty appear to be the most preferred strategies to increase female and/or URiM residents. Female and/or URiM program directors placed a greater importance on recruiting diverse applicants and supporting safe discussion of workplace issues faced by female and/or URiM radiology residents.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Academic Radiology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      REFERENCES

        • Fite BZ
        • Hinostroza V
        • States L
        • et al.
        Increasing diversity in radiology and molecular imaging: current challenges.
        Mol Imaging Biol. 2021; : 1-14https://doi.org/10.1007/s11307-021-01610-3
        • Adham S
        • Rybicki FJ
        • Mahoney MC
        • et al.
        Analysis of gender disparity in US and Canadian radiology residency programs.
        Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2021; (S0363-0188(21)00040-2)https://doi.org/10.1067/j.cpradiol.2021.03.002
        • Lightfoote JB
        • Fielding JR
        • Deville C
        • et al.
        Improving diversity, inclusion, and representation in radiology and radiation oncology part 1: why these matter.
        J Am Coll Radiol. 2014; 11: 673-680https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2014.03.007
        • Chapman CH
        • Hwang WT
        • Both S
        • Thomas Jr, CR
        • Deville C
        Current status of diversity by race, Hispanic ethnicity, and sex in diagnostic radiology.
        Radiology. 2014; 270: 232-240https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.13130101
        • Lightfoote JB
        • Deville C
        • Ma LD
        • Winkfield KM
        • Macura KJ
        Diversity, inclusion, and representation: it is time to act.
        J Am Coll Radiol. 2016; 13: 1421-1425https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2016.08.008
        • Francavilla ML
        • Arleo EK
        • Bluth EI
        • et al.
        Surveying academic radiology department chairs regarding new and effective strategies for medical student recruitment.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2016; 207: 1171-1175https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.16.16445
        • Rozenshtein A
        • Griffith BD
        • Slanetz PJ
        • et al.
        “What Program Directors Think” V: results of the 2019 spring survey of the Association of Program Directors in Radiology (APDR).
        Acad Radiol. 2021; 28: 718-725https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2020.06.035
        • Rozenshtein A
        • Griffith B
        • Ruchman RB
        Residency match during the COVID-19 pandemic: the clear and present danger of the remote interview.
        Am Coll Radiol. 2021; 18: 438-441
        • Bhasin A
        • Musa A
        • Massoud L
        • et al.
        Increasing diversity in cardiology: a fellowship director's perspective.
        Cureus. 2021; 13: e16344https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.16344
        • Madsen LB
        • Kalantarova S
        • Jindal R
        • et al.
        National survey to assess gender, racial, and ethnic differences among radiology residency applicants regarding factors impacting program selection.
        Acad Radiol. 2020; (S1076-63332(20)30449-9)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2020.07.026
        • Spottswood SE
        • Spalluto LB
        • Washington ER
        • et al.
        Design, implementation, and evaluation of a diversity program for radiology.
        J Am Coll Radiol. 2019; 16: 983-991https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2018.12.007
        • Donovan A
        Views of radiology program directors on the role of mentorship in the training of radiology residents.
        AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010; 194: 704-708https://doi.org/10.2214/AJR.09.3403
        • Zener R
        • Lee SY
        • Visscher KL
        • et al.
        Women in radiology: exploring the gender disparity.
        J Am Coll Radiol. 2016; 13 (P344-P350.E1)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2015.10.019
        • Mehta PJ
        • Hackney D
        Impact of biases in selection and evaluation on the composition of the radiology physician workforce.
        Acad Radiol. 2021; (S1076-6332(21)00133-1)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2021.03.013
        • Campbell JC
        • Yoon SC
        • Cater SW
        • Grimm LJ
        Factors influencing the gender breakdown of academic radiology residency programs.
        J Am Coll Radiol. 2017; 14: 958-962https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2017.02.045
        • Allen BJ
        • Garg K
        Diversity matters in academic radiology: acknowledging and addressing unconscious bias.
        J Am Coll Radiol. 2016; 13: 1426-1432https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2016.08.016
        • Maxfield CM
        • Thorpe MP
        • Desser TS
        • et al.
        Bias in radiology resident selection: do we discriminate against the obese and unattractive?.
        Acad Med. 2019; 94: 1774-1780https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000002813
        • Kallianos KG
        • Webb EM
        • Hess CP
        • Talbott J
        • Bucknor MD
        Use of the implicit association test to improve diversity in radiology.
        J Am Coll Radiol. 2021; 16: P976-P979https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2019.01.010
        • Tomblinson CM
        • Snyder EJ
        • Huggett M
        • et al.
        Five years later: impact of a focused women in radiology program.
        J Am Coll Radiol. 2022; 19: 389-400https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2021.08.032
        • Birch AA
        • Spalluto LB
        • Chatterjee T
        • et al.
        Historically Black schools of medicine radiology residency programs: contributions and lessons.
        Acad Radiol. 2021; (S1076-6332(21)00141-0)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2021.03.201
        • Allyn J
        Diversity in radiology starts at the top.
        RSNA News. 2020; 28: 7
        • Arleo EK
        • Bluth E
        • Francavilla M
        • et al.
        Surveying fourth-year medical students regarding the choice of diagnostic radiology as a specialty.
        J Am Coll Radiol. 2016; 13: 188-195https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2015.08.005
        • MacKinnon GE
        • Payne S
        • Drolet BC
        • Motuzas C
        Pass/fail USMLE step 1 scoring-a radiology program director survey.
        Acad Radiol. 2021; 28: 1622-1625https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2020.08.010
        • Norcini JJ
        • van Zanten M
        • Boulet JR
        The contribution of international medical graduates to diversity in the U.S. physician workforce: graduate medical education.
        J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2008; 19: 493-499https://doi.org/10.1353/hpu.0.0015
        • Wadhwa V
        • Vilanilam GK
        • Chhabra A
        • et al.
        A 15-year analysis of international medical graduates matching into diagnostic radiology residency programs in the United States.
        Acad Radiol. 2022; 29: 137-143
        • Abduljabbar AH
        • Alnajjar SF
        • Alshamrani H
        • et al.
        The influence of gender on the choice of radiology as a specialty among medical students in Saudi Arabia: cross-sectional study.
        Interact J Med Res. 2020; 9: e14666https://doi.org/10.2196/14666
        • Magudia K
        • Ng TSC
        • Campbell SR
        • et al.
        Family and medical leave for diagnostic radiology, interventional radiology, and radiation oncology residents in the United States.
        Radiology. 2021; 300: 31-35
        • Dodelzon K
        • Belfi L
        • Shweitzer AD
        • et al.
        The design and preliminary experience with a virtual diversity visiting student acting internship in radiology for underrepresented minority medical students.
        Acad Radiol. 2021; (S1076-6332(21)00092-1)https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2021.02.021
        • Kasales C
        • Peterson C
        • Gagnon E
        Interview techniques utilized in radiology resident selection-a survey of the APDR.
        Acad Radiol. 2019; 26: 989-998https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2018.11.002
        • Joshi A
        • Bloom DA
        • Spencer A
        • Gaetke-Udager K
        • Cohan RH
        Video interviewing: a review and recommendations for implementation in the era of COVID-19 and beyond.
        Acad Radiol. 2020; 27: 1316-1322https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2020.05.020
        • Kubik-Huch RA
        • Vilgrain V
        • Krestin GP
        • et al.
        Women in radiology: gender diversity is not a metric—it is a tool for excellence.
        European Radiology. 2020; 30: 1644-1652
        • Shah N
        • Nguyen JK
        • Heitkamp DE
        • Pael AK
        • Gupta Y
        Dear medical students: it's time to join the #Twitterverse.
        J Am Coll Radiol. 2021; 18: 309-311https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acr.2020.08.008
        • Hewett L
        • Lewis M
        • Collins H
        • Gordon L
        Gender bias in diagnostic radiology resident selection, does it exist?.
        Acad Radiol. 2016; 23: 101-107https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2015.10.018