Advertisement

Ordering Characteristics Predictive of Noncontrast CT Head Positivity in the Emergency Department

      Rationale and Objectives

      Recent decades have seen a steady increase in noncontrast head CT utilization in the emergency department with a concurrent rise in the practice of physician assistants (PAs) and nurse practitioners (NPs). The goal of this study was to identify ordering and patient characteristics predictive of positive noncontrast head CTs in the ED. We hypothesized NP/PAs would have lower positivity rates compared to physicians, suggestive of relative overutilization.

      Materials and Methods

      We retrospectively identified ED patients who underwent noncontrast head CTs at a single institution: a nonlevel 1 trauma center, during a 7-year period, recording examination positivity, ordering provider training/experience, and multiple additional ordering/patient attributes. Exam positivity was defined as any intracranial abnormality necessitating a change in acute management, such as acute hemorrhage, hydrocephalus, herniation, or worsening prior findings.

      Results

      6624 patients met inclusion criteria. 4.6% (280/6107) of physician exams were positive while 3.7% (19/517) of NP/PA exams were positive; however, differences were not significant. Increasing provider experience was not associated with positivity. Attributes with increased positivity were patient age (p < 0.001), daytime exam (p < 0.05), and indications regarding malignancy (p < 0.001) or focal neurologic deficit (p = 0.001). Attributes with decreased positivity were indications of trauma (p < 0.001) or vertigo/dizziness (p < 0.05).

      Conclusion

      We found no significant difference in rates of exam positivity between physicians and NP/PAs, even accounting for years of experience. This suggests increasing utilization of head CTs in the ED is not due to the increasing presence of NP/PAs, and may be reflective of general practice trends and clear diagnostic algorithms leading to head CT.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Academic Radiology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Hess EP
        • Haas LR
        • Shah ND
        • Stroebel RJ
        • Denham CR
        • Swensen SJ.
        Trends in computed tomography utilization rates: a longitudinal practice-based study.
        J Patient Saf. 2014; 10: 52-58
        • Gupta A
        • Ip IK
        • Raja AS
        • Andruchow JE
        • Sodickson A
        • Khorasani R.
        Effect of clinical decision support on documented guideline adherence for head CT in emergency department patients with mild traumatic brain injury.
        J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2014; 21: e347-e351
        • Berdahl CT
        • Vermeulen MJ
        • Larson DB
        • Schull MJ.
        Emergency department computed tomography utilization in the United States and Canada.
        Ann Emerg Med. 2013; 62 (e3): 486-494
        • Bellolio MF
        • Heien HC
        • Sangaralingham LR
        • Jeffery MM
        • Campbell RL
        • Cabrera D
        • et al.
        Increased Computed Tomography Utilization in the Emergency Department and Its Association with Hospital Admission.
        West J Emerg Med. 2017; 18: 835-845
        • Timpone VM
        • Jensen A
        • Poisson SN
        • Reid M
        • Salzberg M
        • Trivedi PS.
        Redundant Imaging in Transient Ischemic Attack: Evidence From the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample.
        J Am Coll Radiol. 2021; https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2021.07.003
        • Stiell IG
        • Wells GA
        • Vandemheen K
        • Clement C
        • Lesiuk H
        • Laupacis A
        • et al.
        The Canadian CT Head Rule for patients with minor head injury.
        Lancet. 2001; 357: 1391-1396
        • Eagles D
        • Stiell IG
        • Clement CM
        • Brehaut J
        • Taljaard M
        • Kelly A-M
        • et al.
        International survey of emergency physicians’ awareness and use of the Canadian Cervical-Spine Rule and the Canadian Computed Tomography Head Rule.
        Acad Emerg Med. 2008; 15: 1256-1261
        • Sharp AL
        • Nagaraj G
        • Rippberger EJ
        • Shen E
        • Swap CJ
        • Silver MA
        • et al.
        Computed tomography use for adults with head injury: Describing likely avoidable emergency department imaging based on the Canadian CT Head Rule.
        Acad Emerg Med. 2017; 24: 22-30
        • Callen AL
        • Chow DS
        • Chen YA
        • HR Richelle
        • Pao J
        • Bardis M
        • et al.
        Predictive Value of Noncontrast Head CT with Negative Findings in the Emergency Department Setting.
        American Journal of Neuroradiology. 2020; 41 ([cited 22 Dec 2020]): 213-218https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6408
        • Brown DFM
        • Sullivan AF
        • Espinola JA
        • Camargo Jr., CA
        Continued rise in the use of mid-level providers in US emergency departments, 1993-2009.
        Int J Emerg Med. 2012; 5: 21
        • Ginde AA
        • Espinola JA
        • Sullivan AF
        • Blum FC
        • Camargo Jr., CA
        Use of midlevel providers in US EDs, 1993 to 2005: implications for the workforce.
        Am J Emerg Med. 2010; 28: 90-94
        • Hughes DR
        • Jiang M
        • Duszak Jr., R
        A comparison of diagnostic imaging ordering patterns between advanced practice clinicians and primary care physicians following office-based evaluation and management visits.
        JAMA Intern Med. 2015; 175: 101-107
        • Hemani A
        • Rastegar DA
        • Hill C
        • al-Ibrahim MS
        A comparison of resource utilization in nurse practitioners and physicians.
        Eff Clin Pract. 1999; 2: 258-265
        • Seaberg DC
        • MacLeod BA.
        Correlation between triage nurse and physician ordering of ED tests.
        Am J Emerg Med. 1998; 16: 8-11
        • Wang X
        • You JJ.
        Head CT for nontrauma patients in the emergency department: clinical predictors of abnormal findings.
        Radiology. 2013; 266: 783-790
        • Ibañez J
        • Arikan F
        • Pedraza S
        • Sánchez E
        • Poca MA
        • Rodriguez D
        • et al.
        Reliability of clinical guidelines in the detection of patients at risk following mild head injury: results of a prospective study.
        J Neurosurg. 2004; 100: 825-834
        • Sharma A
        • Kirsch CFE
        • Aulino JM
        • Chakraborty S
        • Choudhri AF
        • et al.
        • Expert Panel on Neurologic Imaging
        ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Hearing Loss and/or Vertigo.
        J Am Coll Radiol. 2018; 15: S321-S331
        • Lawhn-Heath C
        • Buckle C
        • Christoforidis G
        • Straus C.
        Utility of head CT in the evaluation of vertigo/dizziness in the emergency department.
        Emerg Radiol. 2013; 20: 45-49
        • Valtchinov VI
        • Ip IK
        • Khorasani R
        • Schuur JD
        • Zurakowski D
        • Lee J
        • et al.
        Use of Imaging in the Emergency Department: Do Individual Physicians Contribute to Variation?.
        American Journal of Roentgenology. 2019; 213: 637-643