Advertisement

It is All About Perspective: Students’ Opinion About Radiology

Published:August 06, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2022.06.012
      We read with great interest the article by Grim et al entitled “Radiology stereotypes, application barriers and hospital integration: a mixed-methods study of medical student perceptions of radiology” (
      • Grimm LJ
      • Fish LJ
      • Carrico CW
      • et al.
      Radiology stereotypes, application barriers, and hospital integration: a mixed-methods study of medical student perceptions of radiology.
      ), which concluded that medical student perceptions of radiology, either positive or negative, are highly influenced by the exposure to the radiology program.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Academic Radiology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      REFERENCES

        • Grimm LJ
        • Fish LJ
        • Carrico CW
        • et al.
        Radiology stereotypes, application barriers, and hospital integration: a mixed-methods study of medical student perceptions of radiology.
        Acad Radiol. 2021;
        • Podsiadlo V
        • DeBenedectis CM
        Breaking the stereotype: interventions aimed at changing medical student misperceptions of radiology and increasing the female match rate.
        Acad Radiol [Internet]. 2022; 29: S27-S33https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2020.01.021
        • Fielding JR
        • Major NM
        • Mullan BF
        • et al.
        Choosing a specialty in medicine: female medical students and radiology.
        Am J Roentgenol. 2007; 188: 897-900