In-Person Second Look During a Residency Virtual Interview Season: An Important Consideration for Radiology Residency Applicants

Published:August 11, 2022DOI:

      Rationale and Objective

      The transition to an all-virtual residency interview process, in response to the COVID-19 pandemic, has seen numerous benefits beyond applicant and program safety. These benefits include improvements in equity, access and even lowering the applicant's carbon footprint. However, a significant portion of applicants have concerns with being unable to visit a program and interact with residents and faculty in person. A second look opportunity for radiology residency applicants was developed to address applicant concerns while maintaining an equitable interview process for all.

      Materials and Methods

      The second look opportunity took place after our program's final rank list was completed. Second look attendees completed a 10-question online survey after completion of our program's second look to ascertain financial obstacles of attending, the importance of a second look opportunity, and reasons why applicants chose to attend.


      24/24 (100%) of attendees completed the survey. The majority of attendees were from >100 miles away (54%). Only 21% felt that the financial burden of the second look was substantial. However, this response was more common among attendees from >100 miles away (p = 0.013). All applicants surveyed chose to attend the second look in order to see the radiology department facilities and to meet the faculty in person. All applicants agreed or strongly agreed that they learned more about the residency program through in-person discussions with residents and faculty than they were able to remotely and that the in-person second look opportunity is a valuable tool to help make an informed rank decision when interviewing virtually.


      The second look opportunity offers multiple benefits for applicants to help make an informed rank list decision during a virtual interview season.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'


      Subscribe to Academic Radiology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect


      1. Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education AAoCoOM, American Medical Association, et al.: Final Report and Recommendations for Medical Education Institutions of LCME-Accredited, U.S. Osteopathic, and Non-U.S. Medical School Applicants. 2020.

      2. American Association of Colleges of Osteopathic Medicine, Coalition for Physician Accountability Release Virtual Interview Recommendations for 2021-22 Residency Season. Targeted News Service. 2021 08/25/2021 Aug 25.

      3. Program TMNRM. Coalition For Physician Accountability Releases Recommendations On 2021-22 Residency Season Interviewing. 2021.

        • Nguyen JK
        • Shah N
        • Heitkamp DE
        • Gupta Y.
        COVID-19 and the Radiology Match: A Residency Program's Survival Guide to the Virtual Interview Season.
        Academic radiology. 2020; 27 (Epub 2020/07/15PubMed PMID32660754PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC7340060): 1294-1297
        • Patel TY
        • Bedi HS
        • Deitte LA
        • Lewis PJ
        • Marx MV
        • Jordan SG.
        Brave New World: Challenges and Opportunities in the COVID-19 Virtual Interview Season.
        Academic radiology. 2020; 27 (Epub 07/15PubMed PMID: 32948443): 1456-1460
        • Moran SK
        • Nguyen JK
        • Grimm LJ
        • Yee JM
        • Maxfield CM
        • Shah N
        • et al.
        Should Radiology Residency Interviews Remain Virtual? Results of a Multi-institutional Survey Inform the Debate.
        Academic radiology. 2021;
        • Wilson LT
        • Milliken L
        • Cagande C
        • Stewart C.
        Responding to Recommended Changes to the 2020–2021 Residency Recruitment Process From a Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Perspective.
        Academic Medicine. 2022; 97 (PubMed PMID00001888-202205000-00014): 635-642
        • Guichet PL
        • Huang J
        • Zhan C
        • Millet A
        • Kulkarni K
        • Chhor C
        • et al.
        Incorporation of a Social Virtual Reality Platform into the Residency Recruitment Season.
        Academic radiology. 2022; 29 (Epub 07/01PubMed PMID: 34217613): 935-942
        • Czawlytko C
        • Smith E
        • Awan O
        • Resnik C
        • Hossain R.
        The Effect of Virtual Interviews and Social Media on Applicant Decision-Making During The 2020-2021 Resident Match Cycle.
        Academic radiology. 2022; 29: 928-934
        • Phadke D
        • Khaja MS
        • Banathy AK
        • Clark MR
        • Grewal S
        • Kinariwala D
        • et al.
        Maximizing Educational Engagement and Program Exposure for Recruitment to the Integrated and Independent Interventional RadiologyPrograms in a Virtual Environment.
        Academic radiology. 2022; 29 (Epub 09/25PubMed PMID: 34580013): 413-415
        • Jones HM
        • Ankem A
        • Seroogy EA
        • Kalantar A
        • Goldsmith DC
        • Rizenbergs KC
        • et al.
        Impact of COVID-19 on Radiology Residency Selection Process: A Survey of Radiology Residency Programs in the US.
        Academic radiology. 2022; 29: 779-785
        • Deitte LA
        • Mian AZ
        • Esfahani SA
        • Hu J-Y.
        Going Virtual: Redesigning the Interview Experience.
        Journal of the American College of Radiology: JACR. 2021; 18 (Epub 07/13PubMed PMID: 32673575): 337-339
        • Kerrigan TP
        • Jeong CY
        • Pannu S
        • Yen SP
        • Rooney TB.
        Increasing Applicant Engagement During the 2020-2021 Virtual Residency Interview Cycle and Beyond: The Dartmouth-Hitchcock Radiology Residency Video Project.
        Academic radiology. 2021;
        • Wong TY
        • Huang JJ
        • Cooke EA
        • Hoffmann JC
        • Donnelly EF.
        Adapting to the Era of Virtual Recruitment: Radiology Departmental Website Response to COVID-19 and Portrayal of the Resident Experience.
        Academic radiology. 2022; 29 (Epub 2022/04/06PubMed PMID: 35379478PubMed Central PMCIDPMCPMC8971923): 771-778
        • Yee JM
        • Moran S
        • Chapman T.
        From Beginning to End: A Single Radiology Residency Program's Experience with Web-Based Resident Recruitment during COVID-19 and a Review of the Literature.
        Academic radiology. 2021; 28: 1159-1168
        • Kenigsberg AP
        • Khouri Jr., RK
        • Kuprasertkul A
        • Wong D
        • Ganesan V
        • Lemack GE
        Urology Residency Applications in the COVID-19 Era.
        Urology. 2020; 143 (Epub 06/17PubMed PMID: 32562774): 55-61
        • Lewis P
        • Hayward J
        • Chertoff J.
        Student Interviews for Radiology Residency: What Influences How Students Rank Programs?.
        Journal of the American College of Radiology. 2010; 7: 439-445
      4. AAMC Interview Guidance for the 2022-2023 Residency Cycle 2022[cited 2022 05/23/2022]. Available from:

        • Allister L
        • Baghdassarian A
        • Caglar D
        • Chapman J
        • Ciener DA
        • Fein DM
        • et al.
        Pediatric Emergency Medicine Fellowship Directors' 2021 Collective Statement on Virtual Interviews and Second Looks.
        Pediatric Emergency Care. 2021; 37
      5. 2023 Main Residency Master Calendar 2022 [cited 2022 07/05/2022]. Available from: