Like radiologic images themselves, most situations that radiologists and radiology
trainees encounter are subject to interpretation. Suppose a colleague points out a
radiologist's interpretive error. The radiologist could respond in different ways.
One would be to regard the correction as a helpful learning opportunity that can be
used to prevent similar errors in the future. The radiologist could also treat it
as a nuisance, a matter of no real consequence, to be quickly forgotten. Another quite
different response would be to see it as a personal attack, perhaps another in a long
series of attacks to which the radiologist has been subjected.
Key Words
To read this article in full you will need to make a payment
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to Academic RadiologyAlready a print subscriber? Claim online access
Already an online subscriber? Sign in
Register: Create an account
Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect
References
- The tendency to interpersonal victimhood: the personal-ity construct and its consequences.Personality Indiv Diff. 2020; 165110134
- Unraveling the mindset of victimhood.Sci Am. 2020; (Available at) (Last Accessed January 10, 2022)
- A state-trait analysis of job satisfaction: on the effect of core self-evaluations.Applied Psychol: Inst Rev. 2006; 55: 27-52
Article Info
Publication History
Published online: November 08, 2022
Accepted:
October 24,
2022
Received:
October 18,
2022
Publication stage
In Press Corrected ProofIdentification
Copyright
© 2022 The Association of University Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
