Advertisement

American College of Radiology (ACR) Appropriateness Criteria and EURO-2000 Guidelines Offer Limited Guidance for MRI Imaging of Pediatric Patients

Published:December 24, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2022.12.017

      Purpose

      This study aims to evaluate the clinical scenarios addressed by the EURO-2000 guidelines and the ACR appropriateness criteria for referring children to MRI and assessing the referring physician compliance with both guidelines.

      Methods

      In January 2022, clinical scenarios reported in the last 1000 consecutive MRI requests for children (0−16 years) in one university children's hospital and two general university hospitals in Belgium, Europe, were retrospectively matched to the EURO-2000 guidelines and ACR appropriateness criteria. The number of clinical scenarios addressed and the justification for MRI referral were independently assessed for both guidelines. Pooled data from the three centers were evaluated and then analyzed by center, body area and prescriber using McNemar's test for paired proportions and χ2-tests unpaired proportions.

      Results

      After excluding incomplete or missing MRI requests, 2932 of 3000 requests were included in the analysis. Overall, out of 2932 clinical scenarios, 1229 (37.99%) were addressed by EURO-2000 and 1081 (36.37%) were addressed by the ACR appropriateness criteria (McNemar test, p = 0.12). The proportions of clinical scenarios covered by the two guidelines were statistically similar when comparing centers, but varied across body regions (p < 0.001) and referring physician specialty (p between 0.75 and 0.001). EURO-2000 guidelines provided better coverage for head and spine (p < 0.05), while the ACR appropriateness criteria provided broader coverage for abdomen, pelvis, and musculoskeletal system (p < 0.0001). For addressed clinical scenarios, prescriber compliance for both guidelines was excellent with > 94% of justified MRI examinations in all the centers.

      Conclusions

      Both the EURO-2000 guidelines and the ACR appropriateness criteria did not address two-thirds of clinical scenarios in children. Head and neck, chest and abdominal-pelvic examinations are the anatomic regions which should receive a specific attention for the future implementation of evidence-based clinical decision support tools for all referring specialists.

      Key Words

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to Academic Radiology
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      REFERENCES

        • Zhu B
        • Zhang B
        • Li M
        • et al.
        An evaluation of a superfast MRI sequence in the diagnosis of suspected acute appendicitis.
        Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2012; 2: 280-287
        • Copeland A
        • Silver E
        • Korja R
        • et al.
        Infant and child MRI: a review of scanning procedures.
        Front Neurosci [Internet]. 2021; (Accessed June 13, 2022;15 Available at)
        • Schroeder AR
        • Imler DL.
        Less radiation but more overall advanced imaging in children-good news or bad news?.
        JAMA Pediatr. 2020; 174e202222
        • Cohen E
        • Rodean J
        • Diong C
        • et al.
        Low-value diagnostic imaging use in the pediatric emergency department in the United States and Canada.
        JAMA Pediatrics. 2019; 173
        • Imler D
        • Keller C
        • Sivasankar S
        • et al.
        Magnetic resonance imaging versus ultrasound as the initial imaging modality for pediatric and young adult patients with suspected appendicitis.
        Acad Emerg Med. 2017; 24: 569-577
        • Coon ER
        • Quinonez RA
        • Moyer VA
        • et al.
        Overdiagnosis: how our compulsion for diagnosis may be harming children.
        Pediatrics. 2014; 134: 1013-1023
        • Streur CS
        • Lin PJ
        • Hollingsworth JM
        • et al.
        The impact of the image gently campaign on CT use for the evaluation of pediatric nephrolithiasis.
        J Urol. 2019; 201: 996-1004
        • Goske MJ
        • Applegate KE
        • Boylan J
        • et al.
        The “Image Gently” campaign: increasing CT radiation dose awareness through a national education and awareness program.
        Pediatr Radiol. 2008; 38: 265-269
        • Coon ER
        • Newman TB
        • Hall M
        • et al.
        Trends in imaging findings, interventions, and outcomes among children with isolated head trauma.
        Pediatr Emer Care. 2021; 37: 55-61
        • Larson DB
        • Johnson LW
        • Schnell BM
        • et al.
        Rising use of CT in child visits to the emergency department in the United States, 1995-2008.
        Radiology. 2011; 259: 793-801
        • Marin JR
        • Rodean J
        • Hall M
        • et al.
        Trends in use of advanced imaging in pediatric emergency departments, 2009-2018.
        JAMA Pediatrics [Internet]. 2020; 174 (Available at)
        • Miglioretti DL
        • Johnson E
        • Williams A
        • et al.
        The use of computed tomography in pediatrics and the associated radiation exposure and estimated cancer risk.
        JAMA Pediatrics. 2013; 167: 700-707
        • Richman IB
        • Brodie M.
        A National study of burdensome health care costs among non-elderly Americans.
        BMC Health Services Research. 2014; 14: 435
        • Stolberg HO.
        Evidence-based radiology: a new approach to the practice of radiology.
        Radiology. 2001; 220: 566-575
        • del Rosario Pérez M.
        Referral criteria and clinical decision support: radiological protection aspects for justification.
        Annals of the ICRP. 2015; 44: 276-287
        • Van Breuseghem I
        • Geusens E.
        Assessment of the appropriateness of requested radiological examinations for outpatients and the potential financial consequences of guideline application.
        J Belge Radiol. 2006; 89: 8-11
        • European Commission
        • Directorate General for Energy
        Referral guidelines for medical imaging: availability and use in the European Union.
        LU: Publications Office, Brussels, Belgium2014 ([Internet]Accessed June 24, 2022 Available at)
      1. American College of Radiology. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Available at: https://acsearch.acr.org/list, Accessed September 14, 2022.

      2. ESR IGuide Clinical Decision Support Using European Imaging Referral Guidelines. Available at: https://www.myesr.org/esriguide, Accessed September 14, 2022.

        • Appiah V
        • Taylor S
        • Vaulet T
        • et al.
        Are referral guidelines for CT examinations addressing all clinical scenarios? A comparison of EURO-2000 Guidelines and ESR iGuide.
        EurRadiol. 2021; 31: 6605-6611
        • Offiah AC
        • Andronikou S
        • Avni F
        • et al.
        Expert opinion: what are the greatest challenges and barriers to applying evidence-based and practical approaches to preclinical and clinical research in the field of pediatric radiology?.
        Pediatr Radiol. 2014; 44: 1209-1212
        • Lauren MN
        • Monika KG
        • Gia MB
        • James MC
        • Joanna SC
        US emergency department trends in imaging for pediatric nontraumatic abdominal pain.
        Pediatrics. 2017; 140e20170615
        • Wirth S
        • Hebebrand J
        • Basilico R
        • et al.
        European Society of Emergency Radiology: guideline on radiological polytrauma imaging and service (short version).
        Insights Imaging. 2020; 11: 135
        • Kuppermann N
        • Holmes JF
        • Dayan PS
        • et al.
        Identification of children at very low risk of clinically-important brain injuries after head trauma: a prospective cohort study.
        Lancet. 2009; 374: 1160-1170
        • Gransjøen AM
        • Wiig S
        • Lysdahl KB
        • et al.
        Barriers and facilitators for guideline adherence in diagnostic imaging: an explorative study of GPs’ and radiologists’ perspectives.
        BMC Health Serv Res. 2018; 18
        • Stichelbaut N.
        Utilisation des recommandations pour l'imagerie médicale en Belgique: étude multicentrique de follow-up après trois ans de campagne active pour un usage plus efficient de l'imagerie médicale.
        Collège de Radiologie, Brussels, Belgium2015
        • Tack D
        • Louagé F
        • Van Muylem A
        • et al.
        Radiation protection: factors influencing compliance to referral guidelines in minor chest trauma.
        Eur Radiol. 2018; 28: 1420-1426
        • Saban M
        • Sosna J
        • Singer C
        • et al.
        Clinical decision support system recommendations: how often do radiologists and clinicians accept them?.
        Eur Radiol. 2022; 32: 4218-4224